Man vs Machine or a Zombie Apocalpyse? Which is worse?

So..if there was ever a world ending threat such as a zombie apocalypse or a man vs machine type of situation..like Terminator for instance,which would be worse in your opinion?

Have you seen the animatrix? Holy crap a Machine apocalpyse is a sucky way to go!

I figure zombies would be easier to survive. Although neither is easy.

Zombies would be much easier to survive.

I fear the Cardassians more

The problem with terminator apocalypse they were designed to kill humans.

Unless we wound up having smart zombies like in Resident Evil lol also if i recall terminators weren't exactly designed to kill humans..It was that skynet became too smart and turned on the humans.

@gambit474: The US military created them for war...So there's that.

Zombies would be much easier to survive. They aren't smart or organized. Machines would be more intelligent, more sneaky, organized, and intent on more than just eating.

Plus, think about this: stab a zombie in the face, or figure out the weakness to a metallic robot with range weapons and body armor. Hmm...

I agree with Jedi

Yeah... I'd be more worried about things that can shoot me dead.

Hmmm, Zombies spread easier and multiply faster, while Robots are more durable and powerful.

Turning into a zombie is a shitty way to die whilst getting shot isn't that bad.

Also seeing your friends and family turn and having to kill them is hard.

Skynet still became too intelligent..it pulled an Ultron

@fuchsia_nightingale said:

I fear the Cardassians more

I would surrender to Dukat in five seconds. Dude is too awesome to fight against.

DUKAT <3

Machines by far lol more durable, adapt, smarter then any zombie and would give man a hard time. The war in terminator series took tons of decades to win literally nuff said

This

I think it'd suck more to get eaten over getting shot..or whatever it is machines would want to do to us lol

This would be worse =P

Depends. Do the machines serve me? It's very hot here in Canada. Yes, also get Summer. I doubt the zombies would last long.

@fadetoblackbolt: ^-^

I prefer a machine revolution as a robot.

Machines kill you quickly and efficiently.

Zombies rip you apart and eat you.

Oh, how naive of you, it's adorable.

Robot Apocalypse is much worse, because robots are way harder to kill then Zombies.

The machines take us and start turning us into them like they did Marcus in Terminator Salvation <.<

Zombies are a lot easier to fight then skynet.

Zombies would be much easier to deal with. Machines would probably be an outside context problem.

Btw peeps..When I said man vs machine I didn't mean it just had to be Terminator,I was just simply using it as an example.

If there is a Zombie Apocalypse it would be a lot easier to survive because the zombies are stupid and badly organized while machines are smart and it would be way harder to go up against them.

Bring on the zombies

What kind of zombies we talking about? Resident evil/WWZ type zombies or your average day of the dead zombies? Cause if we're dealing with some RE or WWZ stuff I'd rather fight machines. Otherwise zombies would be easier.

Might depend what kind of Zombie apocalypse, and a few factors surrounding that. I figure the machines would just outright kill you. But if it's zombies, they'll eat you or turn you (or both?). And if they turn you, do you still maintain any semblance of feeling and cognition at all. And if it's like Resident Evil, that'd suck, but if it's like the older kind where they're just stupid people who can't run, can't use tools, and like to get their bite on, it'd be more manageable.