Deadshot is NOT Black!

  • 102 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for yung_ancient_one
Yung ANcient One

5308

Forum Posts

138

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

#51  Edited By Yung ANcient One

@ryagan: Neither does the OP. The title was used to attract you're attention, the Op is basically saying it does not matter.

Thank you for reading. I honestly appreciate it.

IMO, only racist nerds care. General film audiences don't give a cr@p.

Did you read my entire OP? I gave quite a few examples on how most nerds/geeks aren't inherently racist but just have proprietary issues.

i have more problems with suck -arse bad costumes that have nothing to do with the characters. I hated the X-Men costumes in the first 3 films. Loved Heimdal in Thor. Don't recall the Stan and Jack version being Jamaican, but I didn't care.

I resent a healthy female character being played by a skinny-arse anorexic (sending a bad message) than whether the actress is Angela Bassett versus Jennifer Anniston.

I respect your point of view. I think the subject you bring up is exactly what I'm talking about when I posted that "There are more important things for our community to be concerned about than seeing a biracial Wally West."

@scouterv said:
@mr_clockwork91 said:

@yung_ancient_one: I have always felt like there are certain characters that aren't or shouldn't be race changeable like Batman or Iron Man. However some characters I feel like it doesn't matter as long as they get the heart and feel for the characters right. Deadshot happens to be one of these characters that can be interchangeable.

I don't know. I think it would be interesting to see Bruce Wayne portrayed by a black guy. Just because it's one way some place, doesn't mean it can't be another in another universe.

And maybe in one universe, Bruce Wayne was a black guy and Alfred is an Asian woman, (obviously with a different name.)

I agree with ScouterV. I am a sucker for parallel universes and I think it would be cool to see that the all mighty Batman is a "BAMF" because he's the goddamn Batman and not just because he's a white Batman.

Everyone has a favorite character that they want to see portrayed correctly in the movies. To me, Will Smith as Deadshot is as wrong as it gets. If Will Smith was playing Batman, there would be riots.

There were online riots because Ben Affleck is going to be Batsman... so I wouldn't be surprised if they would be upset about Smith getting the role of Bruce Wayne.

@yung_ancient_one:

now this is a quality post! (0_o)d

Thank you. (+)

Avatar image for deactivated-61bde0e570bb9
deactivated-61bde0e570bb9

3110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Good writing, a bit overlong though, ill admit to not finishing the whole thing.

I'm just glad people are getting a Suicide Squad movie.

Avatar image for jaken7
JakeN7

15180

Forum Posts

608

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

@yung_ancient_one: Bruh, don't worry. Didn't mean to come off aggravated, I just thought that passage was slightly ironic is all.

It's a really, really solid write-up on your part, actually.

Avatar image for yung_ancient_one
Yung ANcient One

5308

Forum Posts

138

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

Wanted was so far off from the source material, Fox being white was one of the lesser changes. Craptastic movie. Great read.

I'm not the biggest fan of alterations that are made to the source material unless things just don't translate to real life from the comics. That said, Black Johnny Storm is less an issue then his sister for me. I can't stand Kate Mara.

Long story short, I don't think it's wrong to be upset about changes, be they race, gender, costume, origin, characterization, etc. Some people seem to be throwing down "racist" or "sexist" to shame others into not sharing how they feel about pop culture.

And getting into specifics, Deadshot being black won't be an issue for me. Will Smith deciding to play Will Smith instead of Deadshot may be an issue for me.

I specifically wanted to reply to you. I don't know I missed you.

I. True, WANTED was far off from the source material.

II. I don't think there is anything wrong, per say, to "be upset about changes, be they race, gender, costume, origin, characterization, etc." However, I do think it isn't that serious and most folks should let it go because at the end of the day it is a parallel universe.

III. I think you bring up a good point about throwing words around for the sake of winning an argument or "shaming" others for not having the same feelings about pop culture.

IV. Yeah, I'm not a huge fan of established actors taking the role of a popular Super Hero or Super Villain. However, Robert Downey JR, Dave Bautista, and Heath Ledger showed me that an established actor can still carry my suspension of disbelief. But, yeah, every time I watch a Will Smith movie (hell I call them Will Smith movies for crying out loud) I just see Will Smith. There's Will Smith as a match maker. There's Will Smith surviving the apocalypse, there's Will Smith struggling to get a job, there's Will Smith as a fish. Still, though, I'm excited for the film. (+)

Avatar image for yung_ancient_one
Yung ANcient One

5308

Forum Posts

138

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

@rd189 said:

Good writing, a bit overlong though, ill admit to not finishing the whole thing.

I'm just glad people are getting a Suicide Squad movie.

Thank you. I will work on making my future post more concise. I have a problem with making them too long.

@jaken7 said:

@yung_ancient_one: Bruh, don't worry. Didn't mean to come off aggravated, I just thought that passage was slightly ironic is all.

It's a really, really solid write-up on your part, actually.

I appreciate it. Again, I read your post and thought, "Oh no. I hope I didn't piss this user off. This users cool." (+)

Avatar image for boynerdgeek
Boynerdgeek

2733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56  Edited By Boynerdgeek

Deadshot is african american in Assault on Arkham animated movie

Avatar image for risingbean
RisingBean

10000

Forum Posts

23

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0


I specifically wanted to reply to you. I don't know I missed you.

I. True, WANTED was far off from the source material.

II. I don't think there is anything wrong, per say, to "be upset about changes, be they race, gender, costume, origin, characterization, etc." However, I do think it isn't that serious and most folks should let it go because at the end of the day it is a parallel universe.

III. I think you bring up a good point about throwing words around for the sake of winning an argument or "shaming" others for not having the same feelings about pop culture.

IV. Yeah, I'm not a huge fan of established actors taking the role of a popular Super Hero or Super Villain. However, Robert Downey JR, Dave Bautista, and Heath Ledger showed me that an established actor can still carry my suspension of disbelief. But, yeah, every time I watch a Will Smith movie (hell I call them Will Smith movies for crying out loud) I just see Will Smith. There's Will Smith as a match maker. There's Will Smith surviving the apocalypse, there's Will Smith struggling to get a job, there's Will Smith as a fish. Still, though, I'm excited for the film. (+)

Cool. I'm glad I had something worth saying.

1. Wanted depressed me so much on film. Argh.

2. I'm with and also against the parallel universe concept. I know that mediums don't overlap so I take the differences with a few grains of salt. The comic Batman is different from the movie from the cartoon from the video games etc. The idea is that the essence of the character exists in every medium. Sometimes there is a point where so much is different from the source material that Hollywood shouldn't have even bothered to adapt a comic property. Wanted is a great example. If they named that movie "Shooter" and changed the names of the characters nobody would have ever realized that it was meant to be based on the comic. Looking at MoS or the Avengers for example, those movies do manage to capture the essence of what makes the characters and stories great.

If a decision works I'm all for it,even if it isn't dead on with the comics. Michael Clark Duncan was the best cast actor in Daredevil. Making Juggernaut a mutant worked better then spending time trying to shoehorn in his mystic origins. If it doesn't work and ruins something I love? I'm a lot less for it. Superman turning back time as a plot device or being a stalker dad are a few examples.

4. I'm with you there. Will Smith plays Will Smith doing X, whether X is being a cowboy or a jet pilot or the last man alive. I don't have the most faith in him, but I also have not seen some of his most acclaimed work. So I guess I'll just have to hope for the best. I generally don't want A list actors involved simply because plot then seems to center around them. Halle Barry as Storm in the Wolverine and pals X-Men franchise for example. While she wasn't able to take the main character reins from Wolverine, she sure stole the spotlight from Cyclops and Jean.

Avatar image for yung_ancient_one
Yung ANcient One

5308

Forum Posts

138

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

#58  Edited By Yung ANcient One

Cool. I'm glad I had something worth saying.

1. Wanted depressed me so much on film. Argh.

2. I'm with and also against the parallel universe concept. I know that mediums don't overlap so I take the differences with a few grains of salt. The comic Batman is different from the movie from the cartoon from the video games etc. The idea is that the essence of the character exists in every medium. Sometimes there is a point where so much is different from the source material that Hollywood shouldn't have even bothered to adapt a comic property. Wanted is a great example. If they named that movie "Shooter" and changed the names of the characters nobody would have ever realized that it was meant to be based on the comic. Looking at MoS or the Avengers for example, those movies do manage to capture the essence of what makes the characters and stories great.

If a decision works I'm all for it,even if it isn't dead on with the comics. Michael Clark Duncan was the best cast actor in Daredevil. Making Juggernaut a mutant worked better then spending time trying to shoehorn in his mystic origins. If it doesn't work and ruins something I love? I'm a lot less for it. Superman turning back time as a plot device or being a stalker dad are a few examples.

4. I'm with you there. Will Smith plays Will Smith doing X, whether X is being a cowboy or a jet pilot or the last man alive. I don't have the most faith in him, but I also have not seen some of his most acclaimed work. So I guess I'll just have to hope for the best. I generally don't want A list actors involved simply because plot then seems to center around them. Halle Barry as Storm in the Wolverine and pals X-Men franchise for example. While she wasn't able to take the main character reins from Wolverine, she sure stole the spotlight from Cyclops and Jean.

I. I actually enjoyed the film a lot and the book. I have a friend who thinks the film and the book are lousy. Everything is subjective.

II. I think we disagree here. I'm all for parallel universe, especially if it makes things less weird like Juggernaut being a mutant cleared everything up easily.

IV. I didn't notice Storm stealing the spotlight. I just saw Logan and I understand because... he is the most popular. It just makes sense to me. I know a lot of Wolverine fans who have no idea his name is James Howlett and/or never bough a comicbook in their life. (+)

Avatar image for africanwilds
AfricanWilds

762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

If he was black, he wouldn't be deadshot. He'd be shot dea.....

You know what, it's not even worth it. Too soon.

Avatar image for jugjugbanks
JugJugBanks

1649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I hear the wild dogs of "Wild West" film wild dogs slavering at the gate.

Avatar image for risingbean
RisingBean

10000

Forum Posts

23

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I. I actually enjoyed the film a lot and the book. I have a friend who thinks the film and the book are lousy. Everything is subjective.

II. I think we disagree here. I'm all for parallel universe, especially if it makes things less weird like Juggernaut being a mutant cleared everything up easily.

IV. I didn't notice Storm stealing the spotlight. I just saw Logan and I understand because... he is the most popular. It just makes sense to me. I know a lot of Wolverine fans who have no idea his name is James Howlett and/or never bough a comicbook in their life. (+)

1. Indeed.

2. It's parallel, but it has to capture the core essence. I doubt we disagree, I probably just didn't explain myself well. Superman is Superman regardless if he is lifting islands without effort, or struggling with a 747 provided that the character is respected. I was for some alterations like Juggernaut being a mutant. I didn't like Stalker Superman because that seemed like something Superman wouldn't do.

4. Storm got more screen time as Cyclops and Jean got less. Jean didn't do much in the first X movie. Her best feat was assisting Wolverine and Cyclops to drop Sabretooth. Storm killed Toad after an extended fight. In the sequel, Scott got turned to a villain. Storm took out Mastermind and saved Xavier. In X-3, Cyke got killed, Jean went bad, and Storm straight up became the main hero behind Logan. I thought the first movie was decently rounded in general, but as the series went on, it went from being an ensemble to being a two man band.

Avatar image for jugjugbanks
JugJugBanks

1649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

"And now, for your anger and raging delight, we present the Native American Namor! The Hispanic Polaris! The Vietnamese Punisher! And in the far tent, the moment of pure GRANDEUR, we give you the ULTIMATE cultural gimp, the Sikh Doctor Doom!!!!!"

Avatar image for deactivated-097092725
deactivated-097092725

10555

Forum Posts

1043

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Once in a while this site delivers some quality, enjoyable reading material. There are a handful of users which I consider to be the creators of such material and you are one of them. I wanted to state that from the outset.

Great blog, with fair and insightful observations of commonly shared perspectives on this issue. Funny and informative and I have to admit, I didn't expect you to be lenient to the parallel universe cinema is when it comes to superheroes. I feel the same and I am looking forward to how these movies churn out, firmly keeping this in mind. The studios are banking on movie goers not really caring or even knowing about comic book counterparts and their focus on casting mostly known actors shows how much of an investment these choices are. A successful movie is one where a sequel (or prequel) gets put into production as soon as possible due to sales and banking on these actors to perform their best to return to the screen in the same role gives me some modicum of trust that these studios know what they're doing.

Awesome read, dude.

Avatar image for dernman
dernman

36147

Forum Posts

10092

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9


@dernman said:

Geez there is so much wrong with this that even the parts I agree with I want to argue. I must resist, I will resist. You wont catch me in your trap.

Do you have a personal vendetta with me? You always seem to tease me with a counter argument but never actually post it. I respect you as a solid Viner but it seems you dislike me or soemthing. I don't mind a counter argument. I am always civil. Why do you constantly tease me?

Not at all. I honestly wasn't aware we had a history as I usually post and move on. Sometimes without acknowledging the post with the user who made it. Usually it takes a long line of consistent posts for me to remember. While I am aware of you as a poster I'm not aware of any particular interaction we had. Probably because like you said I haven't gone deeper in my posts with you.
As for the tease it's not intentional. That's just me saying "hey I see things differently but there is soo much to address, just thinking about it makes me tired, so I'm going to go do something more fun"
Which in all honestly is probably the best thing to do for both of us.
Avatar image for sporedust
Sporedust

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

I think the race of a movie character, should stay the same as the comic... It's just like having white people play Jesus in the movies. Not a big deal, but is it that hard to cast people in Hollywood that are the same race as the characters they are trying to portray?

Avatar image for vance_astro
vance_astro

90107

Forum Posts

51511

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 2

#66 vance_astro  Moderator

I don't have a problem with Deadshot being black, I have a problem with the casting of someone as friendly & safe as Will Smith playing a character like this. I don't think he has the acting chops. I've had this argument with my friends about Will as an actor but we've NEVER seen him play a character remotely like this. Everybody can't play good, bad & anti-hero. Some people need to stay in their lane.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f035224e8503
deactivated-5f035224e8503

417

Forum Posts

157655

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

IMO, only racist nerds care. General film audiences don't give a cr@p.

Remember when all those people threatened to boycott Thor and it still ended up being one of the biggest hits of the year LOL?

Avatar image for fukyourenchamp
FukYouRenchamp

7109

Forum Posts

537

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

And getting into specifics, Deadshot being black won't be an issue for me. Will Smith deciding to play Will Smith instead of Deadshot may be an issue for me.

Avatar image for fukyourenchamp
FukYouRenchamp

7109

Forum Posts

537

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

I don't have a problem with Deadshot being black, I have a problem with the casting of someone as friendly & safe as Will Smith playing a character like this. I don't think he has the acting chops. I've had this argument with my friends about Will as an actor but we've NEVER seen him play a character remotely like this. Everybody can't play good, bad & anti-hero. Some people need to stay in their lane.

I agree with this, Why couldn't they get someone like Arrow's version?

I also don't like Jared Leto as Joker...

Avatar image for noone301994
Noone301994

22169

Forum Posts

25

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70  Edited By Noone301994
No Caption Provided

Avatar image for nickthedevil
nickthedevil

14954

Forum Posts

3121

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

No matter what you say, no matter how socially correct you want to be, race will always matter. Their past, their struggles, their stereotypes, affects a person a certain way.

But "meh, why not, let's change the character's race so black people won't complain!". I have yet to ever meet a single black person complain about not being represented enough (Nowadays). Even in movies with an entirely white cast. When I see or read about a hispanic character, I don't connect or associate with that person. There's no reason to.

Or, It's probably because every other race besides Black has yet to be represented.

Avatar image for rouflex
Rouflex

35970

Forum Posts

16652

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#72  Edited By Rouflex

I'm not alright with this idea. Would they like it if John Stewart, Cyborg, Static Shock or Steel was portrayed by a white person? I know i wouldnt. Instead of changing the white characters into Black characters why dont they create more black characters? I know it's easy to say that but i cant agree with this idea of changing a character. Just like i have a hard time with some costumes.

Avatar image for vance_astro
vance_astro

90107

Forum Posts

51511

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 2

#73 vance_astro  Moderator

@rouflex said:

I'm not alright with this idea. Would they like it if John Stewart, Cyborg, Static Shock or Steel was portrayed by a white person? I know i wouldnt. Instead of changing the white characters into Black characters why dont they create more black characters? I know it's easy to say that but i cant agree with this idea of changing a character. Just like i have a hard time with some costumes.

I think this is stretching it a little. Making black heroes white for a film would actually serve no purpose for a film whereas changing a white character to black at least be explained. They aren't doing it, just to be doing it. Although I think their reasoning is stupid because there are plenty of black characters they can use, Comics as a entertainment format has always played the name game. They would rather take a name you know and put a different face on it, than have to do the work and get you acquainted with a black character you didn't know of before or that they just came up with. They do the same thing with female characters, that's why almost ever popular hero has a female version.

Avatar image for guardiandevil83
Guardiandevil83

9481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74  Edited By Guardiandevil83

@nickthedevil: I kind of agree. Let's just make him Native American. It's kinda owed to them considering every race living in America ain't from this btch.

Avatar image for naamah_obyzouth
Naamah_Obyzouth

7471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

I don't mind a black guy playing Deadshot. I just don't see Will Smith selling the character properly, this is a miss cast.

Avatar image for yung_ancient_one
Yung ANcient One

5308

Forum Posts

138

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

"And now, for your anger and raging delight, we present the Native American Namor! The Hispanic Polaris! The Vietnamese Punisher! And in the far tent, the moment of pure GRANDEUR, we give you the ULTIMATE cultural gimp, the Sikh Doctor Doom!!!!!"

I see your argument and I personally think there is some validity to it. I still think it isn't that bad to have a "Native American Namor, a Hispanic Polaris, or a Vietnamese Punisher" because I think characters like Punisher who have a story not based around their ethnicity shouldn't have restrictions of "race." For me, "race" is a outdated concept that shouldn't exists anymore but it does. It is still a strong issue. I can't pretend like I have all the answers because I don't but I do not see the harm in having a Vietnamese Punisher if the actor is playing Frank Castle and not a Vietnamese stereotype wearing a Punisher costume. Thank you for your post, however.

@ms-lola said:

Once in a while this site delivers some quality, enjoyable reading material. There are a handful of users which I consider to be the creators of such material and you are one of them. I wanted to state that from the outset.

Great blog, with fair and insightful observations of commonly shared perspectives on this issue. Funny and informative and I have to admit, I didn't expect you to be lenient to the parallel universe cinema is when it comes to superheroes. I feel the same and I am looking forward to how these movies churn out, firmly keeping this in mind. The studios are banking on movie goers not really caring or even knowing about comic book counterparts and their focus on casting mostly known actors shows how much of an investment these choices are. A successful movie is one where a sequel (or prequel) gets put into production as soon as possible due to sales and banking on these actors to perform their best to return to the screen in the same role gives me some modicum of trust that these studios know what they're doing.

Awesome read, dude.

Aw, thank you Lola. And, I agree with what you stated, "the studios are banking on movie goers not really caring or even knowing about comic book counterparts."

@dernman said:
@yung_ancient_one said:


@dernman said:

Geez there is so much wrong with this that even the parts I agree with I want to argue. I must resist, I will resist. You wont catch me in your trap.

Do you have a personal vendetta with me? You always seem to tease me with a counter argument but never actually post it. I respect you as a solid Viner but it seems you dislike me or soemthing. I don't mind a counter argument. I am always civil. Why do you constantly tease me?

Not at all. I honestly wasn't aware we had a history as I usually post and move on. Sometimes without acknowledging the post with the user who made it. Usually it takes a long line of consistent posts for me to remember. While I am aware of you as a poster I'm not aware of any particular interaction we had. Probably because like you said I haven't gone deeper in my posts with you.
As for the tease it's not intentional. That's just me saying "hey I see things differently but there is soo much to address, just thinking about it makes me tired, so I'm going to go do something more fun"
Which in all honestly is probably the best thing to do for both of us.

Okay. We haven't had too many interactions but I do remember our first lasted for a while but you had to go out to watch a movie and I already logged out. You said maybe my reply will inspire you to reply once you return to the Vine but probably not. It was a civil and insightful conversation but after that our 3-4 more later interactions were just, "hey I see things differently but there is soo much to address, just thinking about it makes me tired, so I'm going to go do something more fun."

I was just wondering if they were intentional or not. Now, I understand, so thank you for clarifying that.

I think the race of a movie character, should stay the same as the comic... It's just like having white people play Jesus in the movies. Not a big deal, but is it that hard to cast people in Hollywood that are the same race as the characters they are trying to portray?

I feel like you didn't read my entire Opening Post.

I don't have a problem with Deadshot being black, I have a problem with the casting of someone as friendly & safe as Will Smith playing a character like this. I don't think he has the acting chops. I've had this argument with my friends about Will as an actor but we've NEVER seen him play a character remotely like this. Everybody can't play good, bad & anti-hero. Some people need to stay in their lane.

Whether or not it was intentional, your post was hilarious to me. I had quite a smirk on my face while reading this. As I posted previously, I am not a fan of well known actors taking on Super Hero/Villain roles but Robert Downey JR, David Bautista, and Heath Ledger made me realized, I could be wrong. However, like with Bautista, I do not feel confident I will see the character (Deadshot). I feel like I will be watching Will Smith cosplaying.

@vance_astro said:

I don't have a problem with Deadshot being black, I have a problem with the casting of someone as friendly & safe as Will Smith playing a character like this. I don't think he has the acting chops. I've had this argument with my friends about Will as an actor but we've NEVER seen him play a character remotely like this. Everybody can't play good, bad & anti-hero. Some people need to stay in their lane.

I agree with this, Why couldn't they get someone like Arrow's version?

I also don't like Jared Leto as Joker...

I actually mention Leto and the lack of complaints in my OP. I don't mind Leto in actuality. I just honestly find it odd that so many complained about Ledger but not Leto.

No matter what you say, no matter how socially correct you want to be, race will always matter. Their past, their struggles, their stereotypes, affects a person a certain way.

But "meh, why not, let's change the character's race so black people won't complain!". I have yet to ever meet a single black person complain about not being represented enough (Nowadays). Even in movies with an entirely white cast. When I see or read about a hispanic character, I don't connect or associate with that person. There's no reason to.

Or, It's probably because every other race besides Black has yet to be represented.

I personally am not Black but I am Hispanic/Latino (Mexican to be exact). And, I, have felt the lack of Hispanic/Latino character and I personally do get excited seeing Blue Beetle, El Dorado on Young Justice, and/or BANE (I adore him). I can relate with the idea of wanting to see more diversity. I do find it annoying to change a characters background instead of promoting a character who already has a diverse background but it is better than to continue having a lack of diversity.

I think Vance put it best in the most concise manner,

"They aren't doing it, just to be doing it. Although I think their reasoning is stupid because there are plenty of black characters they can use, Comics as a entertainment format has always played the name game. They would rather take a name you know and put a different face on it, than have to do the work and get you acquainted with a black character you didn't know of before or that they just came up with. They do the same thing with female characters, that's why almost ever popular hero has a female version.

(+)

Avatar image for yung_ancient_one
Yung ANcient One

5308

Forum Posts

138

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

@nickthedevil: I kind of agree. Let's just make him Native American. It's kinda owed to them considering every race living in America ain't from this btch.

So much to say, so little time.

Here is my response to Nick the Devil

I personally am not Black but I am Hispanic/Latino (Mexican to be exact). And, I, have felt the lack of Hispanic/Latino character and I personally do get excited seeing Blue Beetle, El Dorado on Young Justice, and/or BANE (I adore him). I can relate with the idea of wanting to see more diversity. I do find it annoying to change a characters background instead of promoting a character who already has a diverse background but it is better than to continue having a lack of diversity.

I think Vance put it best in the most concise manner,

"They aren't doing it, just to be doing it. Although I think their reasoning is stupid because there are plenty of black characters they can use, Comics as a entertainment format has always played the name game. They would rather take a name you know and put a different face on it, than have to do the work and get you acquainted with a black character you didn't know of before or that they just came up with. They do the same thing with female characters, that's why almost ever popular hero has a female version.

And, I just want to add a response to your post. Although, the idea of having a Native American for the sake of diversity is in my opinion pretty sweet, they are not choosing Will Smith solely because he's black. Like Ms.Lola said,

The studios are banking on movie goers not really caring or even knowing about comic book counterparts and their focus on casting mostly known actors shows how much of an investment these choices are.

Will Smith is a big name. And, in my opinion, there are more Big Name actors/actresses who are Black than Big Name actors/actresses who are Hispanic/Latino, Native American, Asian, etc.

I don't mind a black guy playing Deadshot. I just don't see Will Smith selling the character properly, this is a miss cast.

Many share your sentiment. However, the choice of Will Smith does make sense in a business perspective. (+)

Avatar image for silverpool
SilverPool

4562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Way too long DR

Avatar image for guardiandevil83
Guardiandevil83

9481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@yung_ancient_one: I know, I love Will. It was mostly a joke. But I'm also saying they (Native American people) deserve more exposure than either blacks or whites.

Avatar image for gambit474
Gambit474

2196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The thing about a black Johnny Storm is not only was he never black but it's like people never stop to consider how stereotypical it is. Consider Storm's personality and then have a black guy portraying it..Like I said, seems stereotypical. I view it as laziness really. Instead of making new characters or using characters that already represent that minority, they go and take well established characters and change them. Why is it always black though? Why not Hispanic, Asian, or w.e else. I think someone else already mentioned it but what I don't like about it is that films affect the comics. Maybe not always in big ways but one of the top things that gets changed in the books to coincide with the films is appearance. For ex, the Avengers changed a lot in appearance to match their film counterparts. Captain America off the top of my head had his suit changed and you could tell it looks like his film version's. Some say race doesn't matter, I say it does. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

@hopeonfire Nobody's racist for being against it. Wanting someone to stay true to the source material isn't racism.

Avatar image for vance_astro
vance_astro

90107

Forum Posts

51511

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 2

#82 vance_astro  Moderator

@gambit474 said:

Captain America off the top of my head had his suit changed and you could tell it looks like his film version's.

This change was completely necessary and probably would have happened regardless.

Avatar image for gambit474
Gambit474

2196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@gambit474 said:

Captain America off the top of my head had his suit changed and you could tell it looks like his film version's.

This change was completely necessary and probably would have happened regardless.

That's up to opinion, not fact as to whether or not it was necessary. It may have happened eventually sure, but that doesn't change the fact that it was influenced by the film. The character's are also having their appearances changed to where they look more like the actors who portray them. A Spider-man comic I read not too long ago had Peter looking striking similar to Andrew Garfield. Coincidence? Maybe, but I doubt it.

Avatar image for vance_astro
vance_astro

90107

Forum Posts

51511

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 2

#84 vance_astro  Moderator

@gambit474 said:

That's up to opinion, not fact as to whether or not it was necessary. It may have happened eventually sure, but that doesn't change the fact that it was influenced by the film. The character's are also having their appearances changed to where they look more like the actors who portray them. A Spider-man comic I read not too long ago had Peter looking striking similar to Andrew Garfield. Coincidence? Maybe, but I doubt it.

An artist or writer who worked on books that Cap was in or a said that he changed the costume because it matches the one in the films or are you assuming that because it looks like the one in the films?

Avatar image for frozen
frozen

40401

Forum Posts

258

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 14

#85 frozen  Moderator

I don't have a problem with Deadshot being black, I have a problem with the casting of someone as friendly & safe as Will Smith playing a character like this. I don't think he has the acting chops. I've had this argument with my friends about Will as an actor but we've NEVER seen him play a character remotely like this. Everybody can't play good, bad & anti-hero. Some people need to stay in their lane.

Will Smith can wear makeup to look white.

#amirite?

Avatar image for swordmasterd
swordmasterD

2620

Forum Posts

15

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for yung_ancient_one
Yung ANcient One

5308

Forum Posts

138

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

The thing about a black Johnny Storm is not only was he never black but it's like people never stop to consider how stereotypical it is. Consider Storm's personality and then have a black guy portraying it..Like I said, seems stereotypical. I view it as laziness really. Instead of making new characters or using characters that already represent that minority, they go and take well established characters and change them. Why is it always black though? Why not Hispanic, Asian, or w.e else. I think someone else already mentioned it but what I don't like about it is that films affect the comics. Maybe not always in big ways but one of the top things that gets changed in the books to coincide with the films is appearance.For ex, the Avengers changed a lot in appearance to match their film counterparts. Captain America off the top of my head had his suit changed and you could tell it looks like his film version's. Some say race doesn't matter, I say it does. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

@hopeonfire Nobody's racist for being against it. Wanting someone to stay true to the source material isn't racism.

Thank you for posting. I've underlined and bolded the part of your post I would like to discuss.

I. I agree it is lazy to just change a established character's background instead of promoting a character who already exists that represents a minority. However, like Vance posted. They play the name game because it is lazier and a easy win. It is easier to make Johnny Blaze Asian in a parallel universe via a new film than to give Robbie Reyes a film who is obscure to the mainstream audience.

II. Why is it always "black?" Well, actually my OP mentioned other changes. Fox (WANTED) was made to be "White"(Angelina Jolie) when she is "black" in the source material and there are almost no complaints to be found for that lack of respect for the source material. They've made John Constatine into a brunette. It isn't always "black" but it is the only one people seem to really notice. Plus, I think choosing Jolie, Will Smith, Jamie Fox wasn't fulled by "race" but the fact that they are big names in the film community. As Ms.Lola stated, the film companies depend more so on the mainstream audiences than the dedicated fans because in all honesty, people complain like crazy for Star Wars/Transformers/TMNT/etc but they still end up watching it.

III. Films effecting the comics is a bit annoying but... it doesn't matter to me much. There are way bigger fishes to cook than the issue of companies capitalizing on the exposure that the films bring. I complained about Michael B. Jordan playing Johnny Storm because of the idea that a new fan would watch the film, fall in love with the character, visit a local comic shop, look to buy a Fantastic Four comic, and find their character to look completely different than he did in the film. This is only an issue for me because if they want to promote diversity they should promote Black Panther, Cyborg, Blue Beetle, and etc than to change a characters background.

IV. I want to post more but to be blunt. I do not believe you read my entire OP and I feel like I am restating everything I already typed in my OP.

V. Please read the entire OP if you have not done so already.

(+)

Avatar image for yung_ancient_one
Yung ANcient One

5308

Forum Posts

138

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

#88  Edited By Yung ANcient One
Avatar image for darthaznable
DarthAznable

16960

Forum Posts

361

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

There is literally no point into making Will Smith, Deadshot. I'm positive he'll mess it up anyways.

Avatar image for gambit474
Gambit474

2196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@gambit474 said:

The thing about a black Johnny Storm is not only was he never black but it's like people never stop to consider how stereotypical it is. Consider Storm's personality and then have a black guy portraying it..Like I said, seems stereotypical. I view it as laziness really. Instead of making new characters or using characters that already represent that minority, they go and take well established characters and change them. Why is it always black though? Why not Hispanic, Asian, or w.e else. I think someone else already mentioned it but what I don't like about it is that films affect the comics. Maybe not always in big ways but one of the top things that gets changed in the books to coincide with the films is appearance.For ex, the Avengers changed a lot in appearance to match their film counterparts. Captain America off the top of my head had his suit changed and you could tell it looks like his film version's. Some say race doesn't matter, I say it does. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

@hopeonfire Nobody's racist for being against it. Wanting someone to stay true to the source material isn't racism.

Thank you for posting. I've underlined and bolded the part of your post I would like to discuss.

I. I agree it is lazy to just change a established character's background instead of promoting a character who already exists that represents a minority. However, like Vance posted. They play the name game because it is lazier and a easy win. It is easier to make Johnny Blaze Asian in a parallel universe via a new film than to give Robbie Reyes a film who is obscure to the mainstream audience.

II. Why is it always "black?" Well, actually my OP mentioned other changes. Fox (WANTED) was made to be "White"(Angelina Jolie) when she is "black" in the source material and there are almost no complaints to be found for that lack of respect for the source material. They've made John Constatine into a brunette. It isn't always "black" but it is the only one people seem to really notice. Plus, I think choosing Jolie, Will Smith, Jamie Fox wasn't fulled by "race" but the fact that they are big names in the film community. As Ms.Lola stated, the film companies depend more so on the mainstream audiences than the dedicated fans because in all honesty, people complain like crazy for Star Wars/Transformers/TMNT/etc but they still end up watching it.

III. Films effecting the comics is a bit annoying but... it doesn't matter to me much. There are way bigger fishes to cook than the issue of companies capitalizing on the exposure that the films bring. I complained about Michael B. Jordan playing Johnny Storm because of the idea that a new fan would watch the film, fall in love with the character, visit a local comic shop, look to buy a Fantastic Four comic, and find their character to look completely different than he did in the film. This is only an issue for me because if they want to promote diversity they should promote Black Panther, Cyborg, Blue Beetle, and etc than to change a characters background.

IV. I want to post more but to be blunt. I do not believe you read my entire OP and I feel like I am restating everything I already typed in my OP.

V. Please read the entire OP if you have not done so already.

(+)

Hair color doesn't really bother me that much because it's not as apparent as a skin color. I did read through it, I'm just stating my opinion. Even if I chose not to, as some have already said..it's a very long post. Not everyone watches the films when they complain about them. I for one have no desire to see the new Fantastic Four. What amazes me is that when I think about it, it'll be the first Marvel character film I've passed on in a long time. Yes that's one of the most annoying things about when they do these changes. You get a non-comic reader looking at how they are in the movie then they go around acting like that's how the character is suppose to be. I wouldn't mind them trying to appeal to the mainstream audience if they'd quit teaching them the wrong things.

Avatar image for jugjugbanks
JugJugBanks

1649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91  Edited By JugJugBanks

(warning: long post, but history of racism in media is long)

I feel I felt the need to write to you to say that from your response, I don’t think you actually understood my post.

When someone uses parody to mock racism or sexism, they are not endorsing racism or sexism. Sadly, the instagram generation tends to forget this. My post was satirising people whom always go for the straw man arguments about race (and gender) in comics and focus on the minutia of an issue rather than the overall totality of it. Which is why I am unsure if you realise that my post was satirizing people who become irate at the notion of a non anglo Silver Age comic character. Or even a non anglo Doctor Who. Or even a non MALE Doctor Who, or Magneto, or Thor, and I brought these things up to editors I worked for over a decade ago, and got into rather big trouble for it. Because they would rather throw a tokenistic hat into the ring, than expand the length and breadth of "what makes a comic book hero, what constitutes a comic book hero".

Because, when you look at what pol-correct regulations are SUPPOSED to do and achieve (but fail miserably at), it’s *supposed* to be about who is best for the gig, the position, the brass ring, despite anything. Despite circumstances of birth. That’s often what heroes and superheroes and anti-heroes fight for. The racism and sexism and genderism that rails against that is often what the villains are about. But in the industry, this leads to sad ironies.

I mean, you should have seen the look on the face of an editor "back in the day” when they were spitballing alternative universes, and asking for ideas, and I said “Why not portray the Family of Magneto - a Latin name by the way - as a ruling family of Spain like in El Cid, or maybe the Incan Dynasties, or the Yucatan Royal Families, since the history and nobility and the inculcate Sense-of-Self in those ruling families actually match Stan the Man’s basis for Magneto and Polaris better than anything found in Mighty Whitey culture?”

The mere *suggestion* that Magneto or any character of his status could be non anglo was "big trouble". People could "talk" about the need for the narrow expression of race in pop art and mass media to be expanded, but DOING that was a different matter.

Talking versus doing, or in this case, greenlighting new characters and publishing them.

Versus the occassional tokenistic characters, provided by pol-correct editorial groups, are a distraction from what Al Gore might call “an Untenable, rather than Unfortunate or Inconvenient, Truth.”

What truth? “Making Whitey happy ain’t necessary to make MONEY from a comicbook character”.

THAT TRUTH.

Shaft wasn't for Whitey. Foxy Brown wasn't for Whitey. And in fact, Black Panther, the TV animated motion comic wasn't for Whitey. Dis they still make money? HELL yes. Did Black Panther, an African Focused comic and show, get paid for at full rate to be shown in Australia, where African based people are less than 0.001% of the population? Yes. Did it STILL get good ratings? YES. In competition with Spidey and Avengers and all else in a country which is VERY anglo centric.

Seem's Whitey don't care about seeing WHITEY characters as long as the CHARACTERS got some CLASS. Like T'Challa.

The whole problem with race-swapping, including the titular character of this thread, is a distraction, as is almost all overtly expressed racism/sexism/anti-queerism/ageism. It’s is a distraction from the fact that some privileged white boys and old farts can’t stand the idea that maybe they aren’t as good at their jobs as a few (or more) non anglo, non het, non male, non “standard Christian” people. I mean, have you ever seen the work of Denys Cowan, at his best?

Just IMAGINE a 24 issue run of Daredevil, written by Dwayne McDuffie and drawn by Denys, inked by Barb Kaalberg (a personal friend). With Matt Murdoch as a Nigerian or Congolese student accepted to Stanford Law School during the 60’s (similar to my stepfather, the second Black Man to attend Stanford law School). Would it have “compared well” to the Miller stuff? No.

It would have been BETTER.

BETTER.

But would it ever happen? Nope.

Why?

Because it’d show the lack of need for an anglo-centric “comic-verse”.

Which in turn proves that there’s no need for mostly white/male/het creators.

Which in turn proves that there’s no need for NON WHITE, NON MALE, NON HET EDITORS.

Hence my post above. Which was not mocking non white versions of characters; it was mocking the notion that a few variant versions of characters in a non white manner excuses the almost "Siberian Tundra in dead Winter" white aspect of comics in general.

And we all want a change from that. Seriously, all of us.

But what will bring that change about?

A lot of pol-correct posts ain't gonna do it. Pol-correct blither blather on the net has been about since 1992. Yet over 20 years later, here we are, with the same lack of diversity, with an ex DC Bat editor spending half of her bandwidth saying "Hire this female artist!" every second time she posts an entry.

If pol-correct stuff WORKED, all tbhose women would already be hired and paid THE SAME AS THE MALE ARTISTS.

“Annnnnnnnnnd in THIS cornah, we have the Latino Polaris! Annnnd in THIS Cornahhhhhhhh, we have the Mongolian Ben Grimm!” and so on. A big distraction. From the rela issues.

THAT’S what my post meant.

Best to you, Great Thread,

Juggo

Avatar image for albusan
albusan

2945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Deadshot isn't Jewish either but no-one would care if a Jewish actor played him.

Avatar image for yung_ancient_one
Yung ANcient One

5308

Forum Posts

138

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

Hair color doesn't really bother me that much because it's not as apparent as a skin color. I did read through it, I'm just stating my opinion. Even if I chose not to, as some have already said..it's a very long post. Not everyone watches the films when they complain about them. I for one have no desire to see the new Fantastic Four. What amazes me is that when I think about it, it'll be the first Marvel character film I've passed on in a long time. Yes that's one of the most annoying things about when they do these changes. You get a non-comic reader looking at how they are in the movie then they go around acting like that's how the character is suppose to be. I wouldn't mind them trying to appeal to the mainstream audience if they'd quit teaching them the wrong things.

I don't want to sound disrespectful but your first sentence sounds racist. I pointed out the complaints (because there were many) about Constantine being a brunette and not a blonde because it is a clear example of how no one claimed "racism" for the reason behind the complaint. As I posted, fans and fandoms usually have a self-entitlement issue. They feel like they have ownership and want what they want. Some wanted to see a blonde Constantine because that is how they know him. To say that hair color isn't a big thing as skin color is offensive to me. I find both important concerning source material and both trivial when concerning films now. I was quite interested in making sure Michael Chiklis had blue eyes, so when he would be dressed up as The Thing, he would be the ever loving blue eyed thing. I cared that much for the source material but since it is a alternate story, a parallel universe, I don't mind trivial changes such as hair/eyes/skin color or ethnicity anymore.

Again, I don't mean to be rude or abrasive but I found that first sentence offensive. However, I do agree that it can be annoying for noobs to act as if they are in the know. The thing is that happens regardless of trivial changes such as hair, eyes, or skin color. It is a sign of a new highly interested fan/supporter. What we should do is simply enlighten them and inform them of great comics they should buy.

@albusan said:

Deadshot isn't Jewish either but no-one would care if a Jewish actor played him.

My OP speaks about the issue of when fans care and when they don't care. I talk about the concept of "race" and the actual aesthetic issue of a character rather than the actors heritage like Constantine being a brunette when in the comics he's a blonde.

IT is a long post, however.

There is literally no point into making Will Smith, Deadshot. I'm positive he'll mess it up anyways.

There are quite a few posts that explain why there are reasons why Will Smith was cast to be Deadshot.

I would say to look for Ms. Lola's post.

(+)

Avatar image for jugjugbanks
JugJugBanks

1649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94  Edited By JugJugBanks

Dr. Strange wasn't Jewish but I would love Eli Roth playing him.

Gene Wilder is Jewish and played a famous Dr., but I would hate Gene at age 29 playing Stephen Strange.

For me a youngish Sydney Poitier would have the nobilitas and dignitas for Dr. S., the race would not matter.

But again, if we are looking at casting of films being a way to combat racism, it's like treating a gangrenous leg by putting bandaids and anti-septic spray on pustulent ulcers on a foot, that is attached to a leg that is already ostensibly dead, green and slimy from the knee down.

Avatar image for gambit474
Gambit474

2196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@gambit474 said:

Hair color doesn't really bother me that much because it's not as apparent as a skin color. I did read through it, I'm just stating my opinion. Even if I chose not to, as some have already said..it's a very long post. Not everyone watches the films when they complain about them. I for one have no desire to see the new Fantastic Four. What amazes me is that when I think about it, it'll be the first Marvel character film I've passed on in a long time. Yes that's one of the most annoying things about when they do these changes. You get a non-comic reader looking at how they are in the movie then they go around acting like that's how the character is suppose to be. I wouldn't mind them trying to appeal to the mainstream audience if they'd quit teaching them the wrong things.

I don't want to sound disrespectful but your first sentence sounds racist. I pointed out the complaints (because there were many) about Constantine being a brunette and not a blonde because it is a clear example of how no one claimed "racism" for the reason behind the complaint. As I posted, fans and fandoms usually have a self-entitlement issue. They feel like they have ownership and want what they want. Some wanted to see a blonde Constantine because that is how they know him. To say that hair color isn't a big thing as skin color is offensive to me. I find both important concerning source material and both trivial when concerning films now. I was quite interested in making sure Michael Chiklis had blue eyes, so when he would be dressed up as The Thing, he would be the ever loving blue eyed thing. I cared that much for the source material but since it is a alternate story, a parallel universe, I don't mind trivial changes such as hair/eyes/skin color or ethnicity anymore.

Again, I don't mean to be rude or abrasive but I found that first sentence offensive. However, I do agree that it can be annoying for noobs to act as if they are in the know. The thing is that happens regardless of trivial changes such as hair, eyes, or skin color. It is a sign of a new highly interested fan/supporter. What we should do is simply enlighten them and inform them of great comics they should buy.

@albusan said:

Deadshot isn't Jewish either but no-one would care if a Jewish actor played him.

My OP speaks about the issue of when fans care and when they don't care. I talk about the concept of "race" and the actual aesthetic issue of a character rather than the actors heritage like Constantine being a brunette when in the comics he's a blonde.

IT is a long post, however.

@darthaznable said:

There is literally no point into making Will Smith, Deadshot. I'm positive he'll mess it up anyways.

There are quite a few posts that explain why there are reasons why Will Smith was cast to be Deadshot.

I would say to look for Ms. Lola's post.

(+)

Pointing out that skin color is more noticeable than hair is racist? Smh, no it's not. Offensive? Now you're just being ridiculous. A change of hair color isn't that big of a deal because omgz..It's not like nobody's ever dyed their hair a different color in real life. Sure if it's a defining characteristic about them then it's important, but otherwise..Why should it be a big deal? Now you're bringing up eye color which is irrelevant to what I said. I cared more about them having someone who actually looked like and portrayed Johnny Blaze better than what we were given with Nick Cage. Would it have bothered me if he still wasn't blonde? No, because it's not important. Now if Blaze was black instead of white then yes that would have been wrong because Blaze has never been portrayed as black. I find your post offensive. Skin color will always be more important than hair. People throw the word "racist" around as much as they do "homophobe" nowadays.

Avatar image for eisenfauste
Eisenfauste

19669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96  Edited By Eisenfauste

Will Smith really isn't the right choice here, he won't play the part how it should be played....

Avatar image for jugjugbanks
JugJugBanks

1649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

...which brings up "change" and definition of "change". If a character is a white, refined Ph.D. student, and then some dipsh!t hisptertard "director" makes the character a swhite Seattle or Portlandia slacker, more "change" has happened than if the character was made into a Jamaican exchance student with the work ethic of J.P. Morgan.

But again to reference Wild Wild West, the color change of Jim West was immaterial compared to the change in PERSONALITY. The studio was not being pol-correct by casting W. Smith, they merely wanted who was hot for box office sales at the time without a thought. LOTS of African based or Latino based men could have played Jim West (and played him better), but not Will. And if a better actor had been chosen, there would have been pressure on Rossio and his partner to have turned in a better, less half -arsed script. Rossio who's Sandman script and Godzilla script got sh1tcanned, by the way.

Why not have Ice Cube with his one-note monotonous line-delivery playing Matt Murdoch, when that would be impossible as a court lawyer must have RANGE in his speaking manner, like Larence Fishburne (who'd be perfect for the role, and many other classically white roles).

Avatar image for amazing_webhead
amazing_webhead

10761

Forum Posts

1019

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 20

There are cases where this kind of thing works out just fine (Kingpin, Heimdall, Electro) and cases where it really really doesn't (Human Torch). We'll just have to see where this goes.

Avatar image for yung_ancient_one
Yung ANcient One

5308

Forum Posts

138

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

#99  Edited By Yung ANcient One

@jugjugbanks said:

(warning: long post, but history of racism in media is long)

I feel I felt the need to write to you to say that from your response, I don’t think you actually understood my post.

When someone uses parody to mock racism or sexism, they are not endorsing racism or sexism. Sadly, the instagram generation tends to forget this. My post was satirising people whom always go for the straw man arguments about race (and gender) in comics and focus on the minutia of an issue rather than the overall totality of it. Which is why I am unsure if you realise that my post was satirizing people who become irate at the notion of a non anglo Silver Age comic character. Or even a non anglo Doctor Who. Or even a non MALE Doctor Who, or Magneto, or Thor, and I brought these things up to editors I worked for over a decade ago, and got into rather big trouble for it. Because they would rather throw a tokenistic hat into the ring, than expand the length and breadth of "what makes a comic book hero, what constitutes a comic book hero".

Because, when you look at what pol-correct regulations are SUPPOSED to do and achieve (but fail miserably at), it’s *supposed* to be about who is best for the gig, the position, the brass ring, despite anything. Despite circumstances of birth. That’s often what heroes and superheroes and anti-heroes fight for. The racism and sexism and genderism that rails against that is often what the villains are about. But in the industry, this leads to sad ironies.

I mean, you should have seen the look on the face of an editor "back in the day” when they were spitballing alternative universes, and asking for ideas, and I said “Why not portray the Family of Magneto - a Latin name by the way - as a ruling family of Spain like in El Cid, or maybe the Incan Dynasties, or the Yucatan Royal Families, since the history and nobility and the inculcate Sense-of-Self in those ruling families actually match Stan the Man’s basis for Magneto and Polaris better than anything found in Mighty Whitey culture?”

The mere *suggestion* that Magneto or any character of his status could be non anglo was "big trouble". People could "talk" about the need for the narrow expression of race in pop art and mass media to be expanded, but DOING that was a different matter.

Talking versus doing, or in this case, greenlighting new characters and publishing them.

Versus the occassional tokenistic characters, provided by pol-correct editorial groups, are a distraction from what Al Gore might call “an Untenable, rather than Unfortunate or Inconvenient, Truth.”

What truth? “Making Whitey happy ain’t necessary to make MONEY from a comicbook character”.

THAT TRUTH.

Shaft wasn't for Whitey. Foxy Brown wasn't for Whitey. And in fact, Black Panther, the TV animated motion comic wasn't for Whitey. Dis they still make money? HELL yes. Did Black Panther, an African Focused comic and show, get paid for at full rate to be shown in Australia, where African based people are less than 0.001% of the population? Yes. Did it STILL get good ratings? YES. In competition with Spidey and Avengers and all else in a country which is VERY anglo centric.

Seem's Whitey don't care about seeing WHITEY characters as long as the CHARACTERS got some CLASS. Like T'Challa.

The whole problem with race-swapping, including the titular character of this thread, is a distraction, as is almost all overtly expressed racism/sexism/anti-queerism/ageism. It’s is a distraction from the fact that some privileged white boys and old farts can’t stand the idea that maybe they aren’t as good at their jobs as a few (or more) non anglo, non het, non male, non “standard Christian” people. I mean, have you ever seen the work of Denys Cowan, at his best?

Just IMAGINE a 24 issue run of Daredevil, written by Dwayne McDuffie and drawn by Denys, inked by Barb Kaalberg (a personal friend). With Matt Murdoch as a Nigerian or Congolese student accepted to Stanford Law School during the 60’s (similar to my stepfather, the second Black Man to attend Stanford law School). Would it have “compared well” to the Miller stuff? No.

It would have been BETTER.

BETTER.

But would it ever happen? Nope.

Why?

Because it’d show the lack of need for an anglo-centric “comic-verse”.

Which in turn proves that there’s no need for mostly white/male/het creators.

Which in turn proves that there’s no need for NON WHITE, NON MALE, NON HET EDITORS.

Hence my post above. Which was not mocking non white versions of characters; it was mocking the notion that a few variant versions of characters in a non white manner excuses the almost "Siberian Tundra in dead Winter" white aspect of comics in general.

And we all want a change from that. Seriously, all of us.

But what will bring that change about?

A lot of pol-correct posts ain't gonna do it. Pol-correct blither blather on the net has been about since 1992. Yet over 20 years later, here we are, with the same lack of diversity, with an ex DC Bat editor spending half of her bandwidth saying "Hire this female artist!" every second time she posts an entry.

If pol-correct stuff WORKED, all tbhose women would already be hired and paid THE SAME AS THE MALE ARTISTS.

“Annnnnnnnnnd in THIS cornah, we have the Latino Polaris! Annnnd in THIS Cornahhhhhhhh, we have the Mongolian Ben Grimm!” and so on. A big distraction. From the rela issues.

THAT’S what my post meant.

Best to you, Great Thread,

Juggo

I wanted to reply to you sooner but due to time constraints I was unable to. I loved your post. I was just talking about it with a friend. I honestly want to read it again to remember exactly what I originally wanted to reply. Thanks to unforeseeable events, I was interrupted while typing a response. The only thing I remember I wanted to say is that your post was amazing. I am so glad you posted a reply. I am happy that I misinterpreted your original post because it allowed me to learn.

I also wanted to say that I would enjoy arguing with you (amicably of course) about some notions but like you posted, "Pol-correct blither blather" might not change anything.

@jugjugbanks said:

Dr. Strange wasn't Jewish but I would love Eli Roth playing him.

Gene Wilder is Jewish and played a famous Dr., but I would hate Gene at age 29 playing Stephen Strange.

For me a youngish Sydney Poitier would have the nobilitas and dignitas for Dr. S., the race would not matter.

But again, if we are looking at casting of films being a way to combat racism, it's like treating a gangrenous leg by putting bandaids and anti-septic spray on pustulent ulcers on a foot, that is attached to a leg that is already ostensibly dead, green and slimy from the knee down.

Again, I don't know if I agree with your analogy. I mean... I kind of do... but... *sigh*. I am hopeful.

@jugjugbanks said:

...which brings up "change" and definition of "change". If a character is a white, refined Ph.D. student, and then some dipsh!t hisptertard "director" makes the character a swhite Seattle or Portlandia slacker, more "change" has happened than if the character was made into a Jamaican exchance student with the work ethic of J.P. Morgan.

But again to reference Wild Wild West, the color change of Jim West was immaterial compared to the change in PERSONALITY. The studio was not being pol-correct by casting W. Smith, they merely wanted who was hot for box office sales at the time without a thought. LOTS of African based or Latino based men could have played Jim West (and played him better), but not Will. And if a better actor had been chosen, there would have been pressure on Rossio and his partner to have turned in a better, less half -arsed script. Rossio who's Sandman script and Godzilla script got sh1tcanned, by the way.

Why not have Ice Cube with his one-note monotonous line-delivery playing Matt Murdoch, when that would be impossible as a court lawyer must have RANGE in his speaking manner, like Larence Fishburne (who'd be perfect for the role, and many other classically white roles).

I enjoyed this post... I just don't know what to add to it. I feel like it would be better in person when I could just react instantly and ask questions.

@gambit474 said:

Pointing out that skin color is more noticeable than hair is racist? Smh, no it's not. Offensive? Now you're just being ridiculous. A change of hair color isn't that big of a deal because omgz..It's not like nobody's ever dyed their hair a different color in real life. Sure if it's a defining characteristic about them then it's important, but otherwise..Why should it be a big deal? Now you're bringing up eye color which is irrelevant to what I said. I cared more about them having someone who actually looked like and portrayed Johnny Blaze better than what we were given with Nick Cage. Would it have bothered me if he still wasn't blonde? No, because it's not important. Now if Blaze was black instead of white then yes that would have been wrong because Blaze has never been portrayed as black. I find your post offensive. Skin color will always be more important than hair. People throw the word "racist" around as much as they do "homophobe" nowadays.

Ok.

I think my post about Eye Color, Hair Color, and Skin Color are relevant because my point is that Skin Color should be as important as Hair Color and/or Eye Color because it is to me. At the end of the day, I don't care if your hair is purple, your eyes are orange, or if your skin is green because those "traits" are not extraneous when considering the character of a person. It is just as important as the clothes they wear. Does it define them? To a certain extent, but at the end, the judgement of character is through interactions. Therefore, I pointed out how eye color was important because it is when considering to the source material. Best example Ben Grimm who's nicknamed The Ever Loving Blue Eyed Thing. It is part of his story, more so than Johnny Storm being a blonde or a "white boy." I have not seen one complaint about Jamie Bell not having blue eyes but apparently eye color is not as important as Johnny Storm being "black."

The reason why I personally, myself, me, I find your sentence offensive because I find the notion that a person's skin is important, to be offensive. No one's skin color should be important; no more than someone's eye color or hair color. So, yes, my examples are to point out that they are not a "big of a deal because omgz" eye color/hair color/skin color are not a defining characteristic. Plus, your sentence that "skin color will always be more important than hair" is offensive to me because again the idea that pigment is important is offensive. I think skin color should be as important as hair color or eye color, meaning that it shouldn't be of much significant worth. I am quite aware of the world we live in. There is racism and it is blatantly obvious. I know that skin color actually matters more than hair color which to me is ridiculous because it is basically the same thing: a arbitrary trait showcasing human aesthetics.

The way you feel about how unimportant hair and eye color are, is the way I feel about how unimportant skin color is. Your example of Blaze is actually worth adding to my OP to showcase how "I must acknowledge as well that the concern that comicbook fans are racist has some validity. A clear example would be how complaints for the motion picture Wanted having Angelina Jolie( she’s “white”) play Fox (a “black” character) was nearly unheard of." I totally forgot about Blaze. Why is Blaze not being portrayed as a blonde not important when he has always been portrayed as a blonde but the idea that he would not be portrayed as a "white guy" is important? Why?

Either way, I appreciate you chiming in. (+)

Avatar image for yung_ancient_one
Yung ANcient One

5308

Forum Posts

138

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

@ambrose_entheo said:

Good blog. gOOD SHIT,

@madeinbangladesh said:

great bloggg

Thanks you two.

@amazingwebhead said:

Worse things have happened. Deadpool, Mandarin...

Funny but I actually enjoyed the Mandarin "debacle."

@cbishop said:

I have addressed this in different blogs, for different reasons. The first was Why Comics Need to Change, Part 1: Continuity and Copyrights. The second was Mining the Public Domain, OR Why Wonder Woman Should Be Better. The third was Diversity Changes For Established Characters, and that one is probably the closest to this blog. It talks about the Miles Morales Spider-Man and the casting of Laurence Fishburne as Perry White. Basically, I said that Miles becoming Spider-Man was an organic, in-story way of another character picking up the mantle. Fishburne, on the other hand, I called bad casting. Is he a good actor? Absolutely. He doesn't look like Perry White though, who is an old white guy. I suggested that they could have cast Harrison Ford, Tom Selleck, or Sean Connery as Perry White, if "old white guy" was what they needed. However, I'll say here that none of those three looks like Perry White.

Here's the thing with movies though: we go see books made into movies to see our favorite characters come to life on screen. Sometimes they have to use prosthetics to do that (Dick Tracy; Pirates of the Caribbean), or CGI (Hulk; Transformers), or a combination of that and good makeup/props (X-Men; Spider-Man, etc.).

Now, casting in recent years has done a phenomenal job of picking actors that looked like the characters, or that they were able to make look like the characters. So maybe we've gotten a little spoiled, and want to see them all perfectly cast. But not really. We get it- the comic characters are drawn and can look however they need to. It's going to be hard to find real life actors to look like some characters. So okay, Hugh Jackman is taller than Wolverine should be, but otherwise, oh frick, he's perfect! They've never found a guy who looks exactly like Bruce Wayne. <shrugs>

We can deal with that. It's a tradeoff for seeing the costume, the gadgets, and everything else come to life on screen. When a diversity change is made though- swapping a caucasian character for an actor of a different ethnicity? It's like, "Did you even try?" Idris Alba was AWESOME as Heimdall, in Thor- he delivered two of my favorite lines in the movie, that gave me chills- but I was still disappointed that he didn't look like the comic character.

Why is this a problem? Because Vikings were white. Sorry, I have never, ever seen a black Viking portrayed anywhere, in any history treatise, and the Norse mythology was the Viking mythology. Those gods were white- sorry. It's bad casting to cast them otherwise. And Thor should be a redhead, not blonde, but Marvel has gotten away with that for eighty years, give or take.

It would also be bad casting to cast Black Panther as a white guy. He's the king of an African nation, and has always been black in the comics. He shouldn't be an Apartheid loving white guy, nor should he be Chinese. The Internet would have a volcanic meltdown if T'Challa was cast as anything other than a black guy (and I specify the color for the sake of clarity, and because not all Africans are black).

If they make a movie about the Jaime Reyes Blue Beetle, he should be Latino. As much as he looked like the character, Colossus should have a Russian accent. Midnighter and Apollo should be gay, if that ever goes to screen. And I need Martian Manhunter to be green, Sinestro to be magenta, and Starfire to be a golden-orange.

It's not racist to want to see actors that look like the characters. The problem is that most of the Big Two comic characters were created in a time when comics (and just about everything else) was a white-dominated industry, so the main characters were white, and so were most of the supporting characters. Does that need to change in today's world? Absolutely! But not in an arbitrary manner.

Take the existing characters, and let them retire, die, or otherwise be written out in favor of new characters taking over (and that's more what Why Comics Need to Change... talks about). The arbitrary replacement of a white character is as much of a disappointment as it would be to arbitrarily replace any other ethnicity. I've never liked it, in the movies or the comics. Do it in an organic, story-driven manner, and I'm all for it. Just arbitrarily changing it- no, no, no, no, no.

I want to reply to you. I have a lot to read though (I'm talking about your blogs).