"Meh..I'm a bit to skeptical to believe in it.. i'm more like "If i can see it, it's real" kinda guy."
can you see the wind? How do you know its real?
des, I'm not sure."
Ow, but i'm not saying it couldn't be real, a large part of the world remains to be discovered. But i'm not just assuming things. For example, the wind can be measured. Loch Ness, has no proof whatsoever..
Precise, I get what you say. But how can we know whats real if we dont discover it?"
You're absolutely right, we should try to discover it.. but when the Loch Ness lake has been searched countless of times, even with highly advanced equipment and there still isn't a trace to be found of any sort of 'monster'. And all the video's have been looked at by experts and nothing special was found. I'm just saying we should accept the possibility that there isn't anything there and concentrate on other unexplored area's instead of putting time, money and effort into a bottomless pitt.
Precise, but they havent searched all of Loch Ness. there are underwater caves and such that they cant explore. And the water is too murky. They cant search the entire lake at the same time. You have to look at it this way. They search one part of the lake one day. and then another the next, but who's to say that in the time it takes them to move to the other part of the lake, the creature hasnt moved?
"Precise, but they havent searched all of Loch Ness. there are underwater caves and such that they cant explore. And the water is too murky. They cant search the entire lake at the same time. You have to look at it this way. They search one part of the lake one day. and then another the next, but who's to say that in the time it takes them to move to the other part of the lake, the creature hasnt moved?"
yeah good point and scientifically speaking there isn't any food source that the creature can eat to support it
"Precise, but they havent searched all of Loch Ness. there are underwater caves and such that they cant explore. And the water is too murky. They cant search the entire lake at the same time. You have to look at it this way. They search one part of the lake one day. and then another the next, but who's to say that in the time it takes them to move to the other part of the lake, the creature hasnt moved?"
yeah good point and scientifically speaking there isn't any food source that the creature can eat to support it "
Not if it eats other animals. what if it lives of microorganisms like Humpback whales and stuff
"Precise, but they havent searched all of Loch Ness. there are underwater caves and such that they cant explore. And the water is too murky. They cant search the entire lake at the same time. You have to look at it this way. They search one part of the lake one day. and then another the next, but who's to say that in the time it takes them to move to the other part of the lake, the creature hasnt moved?"
I know, but still.. if there was something in there, they should have atleast found a trace by now. And if they can't find it there, there are plenty of parts of the world that haven't been investigated yet. Why not go there instead of a little lake in scotland which they have searched throught countless of times?
"Precise, but they havent searched all of Loch Ness. there are underwater caves and such that they cant explore. And the water is too murky. They cant search the entire lake at the same time. You have to look at it this way. They search one part of the lake one day. and then another the next, but who's to say that in the time it takes them to move to the other part of the lake, the creature hasnt moved?"
yeah good point and scientifically speaking there isn't any food source that the creature can eat to support it "
Not if it eats other animals. what if it lives of microorganisms like Humpback whales and stuff"
you mean plankton thats only in the ocean and i don't know how many fish there are in the lake im thinking very few
"Precise, but they havent searched all of Loch Ness. there are underwater caves and such that they cant explore. And the water is too murky. They cant search the entire lake at the same time. You have to look at it this way. They search one part of the lake one day. and then another the next, but who's to say that in the time it takes them to move to the other part of the lake, the creature hasnt moved?"
I know, but still.. if there was something in there, they should have atleast found a trace by now. And if they can't find it there, there are plenty of parts of the world that haven't been investigated yet. Why not go there instead of a little lake in scotland which they have searched throught countless of times?"
Whast the point in being elusive if you leave traces :P
"Precise, but they havent searched all of Loch Ness. there are underwater caves and such that they cant explore. And the water is too murky. They cant search the entire lake at the same time. You have to look at it this way. They search one part of the lake one day. and then another the next, but who's to say that in the time it takes them to move to the other part of the lake, the creature hasnt moved?"
yeah good point and scientifically speaking there isn't any food source that the creature can eat to support it "
Not if it eats other animals. what if it lives of microorganisms like Humpback whales and stuff"
you mean plankton thats only in the ocean and i don't know how many fish there are in the lake im thinking very few"
There are other micro-organisims besides plankton. I used teh Humpback and its food source as an example
"Precise, but they havent searched all of Loch Ness. there are underwater caves and such that they cant explore. And the water is too murky. They cant search the entire lake at the same time. You have to look at it this way. They search one part of the lake one day. and then another the next, but who's to say that in the time it takes them to move to the other part of the lake, the creature hasnt moved?"
I know, but still.. if there was something in there, they should have atleast found a trace by now. And if they can't find it there, there are plenty of parts of the world that haven't been investigated yet. Why not go there instead of a little lake in scotland which they have searched throught countless of times?"
Whast the point in being elusive if you leave traces :P"
Have you seen the program on National Geographic about the Loch Ness monster? It pretty much refutes any possibility of there being a monster in the lake. I just think the money and effort that is being spent there, could be put to better use in a place where there haven't been any research yet.
"Precise, but they havent searched all of Loch Ness. there are underwater caves and such that they cant explore. And the water is too murky. They cant search the entire lake at the same time. You have to look at it this way. They search one part of the lake one day. and then another the next, but who's to say that in the time it takes them to move to the other part of the lake, the creature hasnt moved?"
yeah good point and scientifically speaking there isn't any food source that the creature can eat to support it "
Not if it eats other animals. what if it lives of microorganisms like Humpback whales and stuff"
you mean plankton thats only in the ocean and i don't know how many fish there are in the lake im thinking very few"
There are other micro-organisims besides plankton. I used teh Humpback and its food source as an example"
Its freaking brilliant.. one of my favourite films of all time.. the ending is HILLARIOUS! its by Peter Jackson.. who did LOTR etc.. his early stuff sh!ts all over his new stuff
im still with this video i know its fake but i still really wanna know how they made it it really looks like they filmed a gnome who is carrying a large bag from the back . btw turn of the sound that guys screams is horrible -_-
"Precise, but they havent searched all of Loch Ness. there are underwater caves and such that they cant explore. And the water is too murky. They cant search the entire lake at the same time. You have to look at it this way. They search one part of the lake one day. and then another the next, but who's to say that in the time it takes them to move to the other part of the lake, the creature hasnt moved?"
Add the immense depth, murkiness of the water, and all the possible hiding places for the creature(s) and one can already start building a case. A plesiosaur or a group of plesiosaurs could easily be sustained by the constant flow of fish into the loch.
"im still with this video i know its fake but i still really wanna know how they made it it really looks like they filmed a gnome who is carrying a large bag from the back . btw turn of the sound that guys screams is horrible -_-
"im still with this video i know its fake but i still really wanna know how they made it it really looks like they filmed a gnome who is carrying a large bag from the back . btw turn of the sound that guys screams is horrible -_-
"
wow that's so cool! i like it..."
it aint no miget from what i`ve heard the legs are to small and thin even cooler look at the gnome at 1:32 somwhere on the gnome you can see a faint skull like the punisher logo i mean if thats real thats some cool pixelation mistake
OMFG Sonnova... This is so freaky. Its the same house that reds posted earlier. Different area.. The girl looks like she is bleeding. its creepy as hell...
Log in to comment