Choose Humanities super power
I really think that our biggest power is being dumb,we have the power to innovate,to create,but how do we use it?Wars,humans clashing against humans,taking many lifes away,making families sad,specially children.Pollution,we destroy the only place we can live,the place we call home and call it progress,shameless.
If we had the capacity to see this from other point of view,we would realise we are destroying everything that is left to us:company,freedom and a place to live.We should concentrate in problems such as hunger,poor people,diseases,but noooooooooooo,we MUST do wars and spend a huge amount of money on what isn't needed.
@deadpoolrules said:
I really think that our biggest power is being dumb,we have the power to innovate,to create,but how do we use it?Wars,humans clashing against humans,taking many lifes away,making families sad,specially children.Pollution,we destroy the only place we can live,the place we call home and call it progress,shameless.
If we had the capacity to see this from other point of view,we would realise we are destroying everything that is left to us:company,freedom and a place to live.We should concentrate in problems such as hunger,poor people,diseases,but noooooooooooo,we MUST do wars and spend a huge amount of money on what isn't needed.
To learn.
@The_Roman said:
@Deadcool: Oh dear god. Who can save us?
@JediXMan: Or option C could be option A. And surely both would end up leading to Option B in the end.
You can create, but you won't learn from past mistakes in order to improve. Option A has learning, which leads to progression, improvement, and creation.
But, yes. in the end, it all leads to option B.
@Deadcool said:
@JediXMan said:
But, yes. in the end, it all leads to option B.
Humanity would not be there forever.
No. As technology advances to beat disease, disease itself will also evolve beyond it. So yeah, you're right. But, in theory, it would take time.
Really, though, I don't see a time when disease will be eradicated - especially not in my lifetime.
@The_Roman said:
@Aiden Cross said:
To duplicate :p
+1
I was going to put "double-think".. but alas.. multiple choice.
@JediXMan: No just disease, everything around us would eventualy be destroyed:
- If we beat desease, we would still being able to get old.
- If we beat age, we would still needing food.
- If we beat hunger, we would still needing to breath.
- If we beat the natural needs, we still needing a planet with a star from a certain distance.
- And if we manage to find a new planet, the universe would eventually disappear.
- More universes, another dimensions, there wuld be always something.
At the end we all are equal to death.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment