I'm Deist. I believe in God, and A Heaven. I just don't believe God cares about whether or not we worship him.
And the meaning of life is living it.
I'm Deist. I believe in God, and A Heaven. I just don't believe God cares about whether or not we worship him.
And the meaning of life is living it.
@cable_extreme: I'm not saying our life has no meaning. I'm saying our life has no meaning on a universal scale. For example Galactus and The Phoenix Force has meaning on a universal scale. Maybe even Jesus Christ. But not myself. The universe will continue as is whether i'm here or not. That is what i mean by universal significance. What do you mean?
The stuff in the op is simply called being a good person. If you need a magical deity to motivate you than you're missing the point.
The great thing about not believing in all that Bible bull s++t is that I can ignore ramblings like that and just focus on being a decent person.
@makhai: an awe powerful deity that rewards you for good deeds would provide meaning on a universal scale.
Also relative meaning is not the overall meaning. An over all meaning to life would depend on whether or not an initial meaning was derived from the start of life on earth, or even a being designing the method for life to spawn and evolve such as using laws of nature to guide it.
(And a lot more factors)
@pooty: universal significants would exist for you if the universe was created for the purpose of creating life. So we know the universal natural laws are currently working together to make life. Now whether or not life was the goal for some sort of force/deity or a byproduct of these laws, depending on that, we either have a universal purpose or not.
@makhai: "That doesn't mean that the text doesn't have meaning just because you don't see it."
Kind of my main point...
I would also point out that I am an atheist so idk why you keep bringing up me believing in something after Death. The initial problem was that you said there is no universal meaning to life, which my rebuttal was, "can't say that because you don't know that" everything else I have said has been what-ifs.
@makhai: "That doesn't mean that the text doesn't have meaning just because you don't see it."
Kind of my main point...
I would also point out that I am an atheist so idk why you keep bringing up me believing in something after Death. The initial problem was that you said there is no universal meaning to life, which my rebuttal was, "can't say that because you don't know that" everything else I have said has been what-ifs.
There really isn't a universal meaning. Life happens. Make the most of it while you have it. Define the meaning of your life for yourself. There really isn't much else to it.
"there really isn't a universal meaning"
how do you know?
"There really isn't much else to it"
You know this how?
"there really isn't a universal meaning"
how do you know?
"There really isn't much else to it"
You know this how?
Comics, Movies, Games, Sex, Knowing People, Drawing, J$rking off, eating junk, alcohol, pot, my dogs.
The meaning of my life is to have make those around me as happy as I can, and to leave this world a better place than what it was when I came in,
I don't need a sky-God to dictate how to be a better person.
How lucky are we to have been born human? To have the capacity to think, reason, decipher, experience, learn, criticise, imagine and suppose? Each and every single day. Amazing.
@makhai: what you are doing is claiming definitive knowledge about something unknowable. Such as "there is no universal meaning" etc...
You cannot back up that claim with a question, you need to rephrase it.
(Example)- I BELIEVE that life has no universal meaning.
To start, I'd first like to say that I'm religious and this question does not apply to me.
However, I'm surprised the topic of morality has not been brought up here. Being against a person killing another --if you did not believe in a deity-- would basically mean you were against the victim forcibly being removed of their right to life. Just because an individual does not believe in a deity does not mean they're unaware of right and wrong.
How lucky are we to have been born human? To have the capacity to think, reason, decipher, experience, learn, criticise, imagine and suppose? Each and every single day. Amazing.
Those aren't uniquely human traits. Other life-forms are still able to do these things but humans do it better than any of them.
Don't get cocky.
@makhai: what you are doing is claiming definitive knowledge about something unknowable. Such as "there is no universal meaning" etc...
You cannot back up that claim with a question, you need to rephrase it.
(Example)- I BELIEVE that life has no universal meaning.
Actually, I'm not. I highly recommend that you read my post again, specifically where I state that my views on the meaning people have in the universe is not absolute knowledge, but the meaning I have carved out for myself. Thanks for the strawman. Furthermore, you asked me to rephrase my question in the form of a statement that you find more comforting when I had already given you the clarification you so dearly desired. You would know this if you had read more than the first bullet point. I am of the opinion that people have no universal meaning and you challenged that thought process directly, asking me how I know such a thing. Which is kind of a stupid question given that my position in this entire thread has been that we all define meaning for ourselves. If you think there is some universal level meaning for people, I certainly would like to know what that is. It seems narcissistic to think your life matters that much but I am completely willing to hear you explain yourself.
@makhai: "If you are speaking in terms of the universe, then yeah, there is no 'meaning' to life in terms of how the universe is impacted by it."
Post number 36
@makhai: "If you are speaking in terms of the universe, then yeah, there is no 'meaning' to life in terms of how the universe is impacted by it."
Post number 36
How does that prove your point? Are you only able to internalize the portions of arguments that you think best help your counter-argument? I expanded upon that comment and you failed to understand. Since you are going back and reading old posts again, I once again advise you to read post 61. You know, the one you keep pretending I didn't post?
@makhai: I am not ignoring your #61 post.
I posted that because you said that you made it clear that you were speaking in reletive terms to yourself. However, many of the claims you have made such as the one I posted shows other wise. The main problem here is you said that there is no meaning on a universal scale. Such a statement has to be backed up, or why say it at all?
Perhaps to better explain, you reference life as in an Earth only model, yet you claim that it has no universal impact. life can exist elsewhere, and life itself (on a universal scale) could very well have meaning. Your claim is what is the issue here.
I am not ignoring your #61 post.
I posted that because you said that you made it clear that you were speaking in reletive terms to yourself. However, many of the claims you have made such as the one I posted shows other wise.
The main problem here is you said that there is no meaning on a universal scale.
Such a statement has to be backed up, or why say it at all?
Perhaps to better explain, you reference life as in an Earth only model, yet you claim that it has no universal impact.
life can exist elsewhere,
and life itself (on a universal scale) could very well have meaning.
Your claim is what is the issue here.
@makhai: you seem to have a misunderstanding of what a straw man fallacy is.
I am not misrepresenting your position since I am referencing a specific claim you made. Also saying life can exist elswhere is not a straw man fallacy either becuase it is related to your initial claim that life has no universal meaning which would incorporate life elsewhere if applicable. What ever you believe, stating something as fact (which you did) is what you did wrong.
you seem to have a misunderstanding of what a straw an fallacy is.
I am not misrepresenting your position since I anpm referencing a specific claim you made.
Also saying life can exist elswhere is not a straw man fallacy either becuase it is related to your initial claim that life has no universal meaning which would incorporate life elsewhere if applicable.
What ever you believe, stating something as fact (which you did) is what you did wrong.
@dum529001: "Meaning" is a human concept, it has no bearing on reality. Therefore, what has meaning and what does not is not a matter of right versus wrong but rather a matter of personal perception. Therefore, we are all individually free to assign meaning to whatever we like.
That's how I see things, anyway.
@dum529001: "Meaning" is a human concept, it has no bearing on reality. Therefore, what has meaning and what does not is not a matter of right versus wrong but rather a matter of personal perception. Therefore, we are all individually free to assign meaning to whatever we like.
That's how I see things, anyway.
Not really. "Meaning" is just common sense.
@dum529001: Meaning is by no means common sense. A man may find meaning in a piece of art and another may see no meaning whatsoever. Meaning is subjective and therefore arguing over what does and does not have meaning is illogical and a waste of one's time.
No one has yet addressed all the OP's points.
What gives a person the right to criticize others if life has no meaning? The same goes for a person who ascribes to "everyone chooses their own meaning," which there are a lot of.
Can no one address that?
How lucky are we to have been born human? To have the capacity to think, reason, decipher, experience, learn, criticise, imagine and suppose? Each and every single day. Amazing.
Those aren't uniquely human traits. Other life-forms are still able to do these things but humans do it better than any of them.
Don't get cocky.
Incredible understatement is incredible. Also, other life forms being able to do what I describe is debatable, especially in the capacity of a human being.
And I am cocky, as I should be.
@dum529001: Meaning is by no means common sense. A man may find meaning in a piece of art and another may see no meaning whatsoever. Meaning is subjective and therefore arguing over what does and does not have meaning is illogical and a waste of one's time.
Not being fully aware of the meaning is not the absence of meaning.
@dum529001: I don't think you understand the concept I'm trying to explain. Whether something has meaning or not isn't a matter of whether it has meaning or not, it's a matter of opinion. Meaning is not something that the universe assigns, it's something we as human beings assign. There is only one universe, so if it were to assign meaning it would be final, but there are many of us so we can each assign meaning to different things and it only affects our individual perceptions of reality. It's not about right versus wrong.
The great thing about this is that it means we do control some aspects of our universe, even if we cannot control the same aspects of someone else's.
@dum529001: I don't think you understand the concept I'm trying to explain. Whether something has meaning or not isn't a matter of whether it has meaning or not, it's a matter of opinion. Meaning is not something that the universe assigns, it's something we as human beings assign. There is only one universe, so if it were to assign meaning it would be final, but there are many of us so we can each assign meaning to different things and it only affects our individual perceptions of reality. It's not about right versus wrong.
The great thing about this is that it means we do control some aspects of our universe, even if we cannot control the same aspects of someone else's.
The universe isn't based on opinion.
@dum529001: Opinion isn't based on the universe.
How lucky are we to have been born human? To have the capacity to think, reason, decipher, experience, learn, criticise, imagine and suppose? Each and every single day. Amazing.
Those aren't uniquely human traits. Other life-forms are still able to do these things but humans do it better than any of them.
Don't get cocky.
Incredible understatement is incredible. Also, other life forms being able to do what I describe is debatable, especially in the capacity of a human being.
And I am cocky, as I should be.
@makhai: I would stay away from claims like life has no meaning on a universal scale. What if there was a being who rewarded people for thier deeds, that in itself would provide meaning on a universal scale. It is best to say "there probably isn't any overall meaning to life".
@makhai: @cable_extreme: So far i agree with Makhai. Even if there is an afterlife that doesn't give your life meaning on a universal scale. Just means you live longer. And adding in the idea of a Almighty Creator makes us less significant. That Being is all that matters
No, I won't because as far as the Biblical God is concerned, you won't be doing anything on the universal scale at any point in eternity. Rewarding you for your deeds does not provide meaning on a universal scale.
There is an overall meaning to life. It just is defined relative to the person. Just because it isn't of the size and scope that you wish the value of your life to be, does not mean that there is no overall meaning. That's nonsense.
see this guy?
according to islam from what my family told me if you die without torture allah will send you to hell earth is the heaven of the qaafirs heaven is the real place for islam
First of all, what is this life that you refer to? I'm going to make the assumption that we're talking about existence. Experience is foundational, if not to existence, than to any claims we can make about the nature of existence; everything we think we know is derived from our experience. What we actually do know is limited to experience, what we see from our existential vantage point; we are not in a position to know anything else, just infer it from experience, and we have no reliable means of testing the validity of inference, we can only say it hasn't been proved wrong, yet.
So the only part of existence that we really know is experience. What we have taken it to mean about the rest of existence is not necessarily true, just as where there is smoke (experience), there is not necessarily fire (an existence that causes, gives rise to experience through the phenomena of consciousness).
Assuming there is such a source of smoke, such an existence that causes experience, what causes that? The meaning of existence is, and always will be, incomprehensible due to infinite regress. There will always be something left unexplained.
But something being unexplained does not mean that it is not true. Regardless of how you came to be, you are. You are an experiential existential vantage point. You may be in pain and you may be happy. No matter how they came to be, these things are bad and good respectively, which furnishes your inner world with moral value. Everyone is an egoist. Maybe you will make that inferential leap and postulate a "fire", an underlying reality that causes other instances of "smoke", experience and moral value, like yourself, and links them through a great multidimensional chain of cause and effect. Maybe you will become a utilitarian as well, driven by faith and pride in taking part in something bigger. It's like Captain America said to a plane full of soldiers and millions of Americans before a battle:
"I wear these colors because I believe in something greater than myself, something bigger...At some point in life, a man makes a decision... Is he alone in this world or are we all in this together? Those of us in this plane right now...have made that decision. I don't care what decade it is. The values that these colors represent transcend selfishness... It's about freedom. That's what I fight for."
If a persons only source of meaning in life is a few thousand year old book and belief in an all powerful being then so be it. But to somehow suggest that not believing in a god or religion means that life is somehow less meaningful or something to that affect is just wrong. Id say the opposite could be argued in fact.
Life has no meaning we make our own meanings and we strive to make the best of it.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment