• 54 results
  • 1
  • 2
#1 Posted by wario1988 (990 posts) - - Show Bio
#2 Posted by Captain_Yesterday (807 posts) - - Show Bio

I was hyped for Assassin's Creed and was horrible disappointed

Then I played AC2 years later and loved it.

Got hyped for AC3 and was... disappointed

So no, but I do like pirates and loved the ship missions in 3 so maybe down the line like I did with AC2

But I don't trust it enough to get too hyped about it.

#3 Posted by SmashBrawler (5624 posts) - - Show Bio

I know someone who won't be happy at all...

#4 Posted by Nefarious (19694 posts) - - Show Bio

Cool.

#5 Posted by Aiden Cross (15562 posts) - - Show Bio

Hmmm... AC3 was not doing it for me. It was good but it just felt like it was lacking something compared to the other AC games. Maybe this one will bring that feeling back, i do like the pirate setting :)

#6 Posted by JediXMan (30310 posts) - - Show Bio

@SmashBrawler said:

I know someone who won't be happy at all...

Same.

Moderator
#7 Posted by Setherial (209 posts) - - Show Bio

Just let the series die.

#8 Posted by StMichalofWilson (3758 posts) - - Show Bio
#9 Posted by Inverno (13197 posts) - - Show Bio

Ugh... Why? Really? Pirates? Just because the naval battles were the one thing everyone agreed to be the best thing in the game (and even that had its problems)? Just because AC III made a better pirate-based game than other recent ones? Now we are going to base a entire game (not a spin-off like Brotherhood or Revelations, but a full installment) on this feature to make more money and please everyone!!! How long does it take for this series to stop being Assassin's Creed and become Pirate's Creed?

Also, this technically sounds like a prequel because the period is set before the American Revolution and Haytham's father Edward Kenway is the protagonist. Why they don't go to the French Revolution, since they foreshadowed it in AC III? Or World War I and II?

#10 Posted by mikethekiller (8391 posts) - - Show Bio

Meh

#11 Posted by Samimista (20668 posts) - - Show Bio

I'll wait til the trailer comes out to judge.

#12 Posted by _Zombie_ (10394 posts) - - Show Bio

Eh.

#13 Posted by StMichalofWilson (3758 posts) - - Show Bio

Oh shut up CaioTrubat. If it has good gameplay, I don't care.

#14 Posted by _Zombie_ (10394 posts) - - Show Bio

@StMichalofWilson said:

Oh shut up CaioTrubat. If it has good gameplay, I don't care.

The guy's allowed to have an opinion. Don't be a dck.

#15 Edited by Inverno (13197 posts) - - Show Bio

@StMichalofWilson: I know its too early to judge since we haven't seen any official details or gameplay, but personally I really dislike the pirate theme, that is all I can say.

#16 Posted by Jonny_Anonymous (32993 posts) - - Show Bio

@CaioTrubat said:

Ugh... Why? Really? Pirates? Just because the naval battles were the one thing everyone agreed to be the best thing in the game (and even that had its problems)? Just because AC III made a better pirate-based game than other recent ones? Now we are going to base a entire game (not a spin-off like Brotherhood or Revelations, but a full installment) on this feature to make more money and please everyone!!! How long does it take for this series to stop being Assassin's Creed and become Pirate's Creed?

Also, this technically sounds like a prequel because the period is set before the American Revolution and Haytham's father Edward Kenway is the protagonist. Why they don't go to the French Revolution, since they foreshadowed it in AC III? Or World War I and II?

all of this

#17 Posted by StMichalofWilson (3758 posts) - - Show Bio

@CaioTrubat: It's alright mate. The game still the same, even if its just less in it.

#18 Posted by Inverno (13197 posts) - - Show Bio

@StMichalofWilson: Well if anything, pirate fans will have their best game ever, at least.

#19 Posted by God_Spawn (37685 posts) - - Show Bio

@StMichalofWilson: C'mon, dude. That isn't necessary.

Moderator
#20 Posted by Loki9876 (3003 posts) - - Show Bio

It will not only be about the ships, it will still be about running on rooftops.

#21 Posted by Inverno (13197 posts) - - Show Bio

@god_spawn: Nah... Its alright, can't you see he was just joking? :P

#22 Edited by Pwok21 (2262 posts) - - Show Bio

I lost interest in the series after ACII as I saw the direction it was going in with Brotherhood.

I mean I still picked up Brotherhood but was disappointed and haven't bought one since.

#23 Posted by scorpion2501 (5488 posts) - - Show Bio
#24 Edited by callsignneptune (112 posts) - - Show Bio

I'm sick of them churning out these games, especially when they originally said it was just to be a trilogy. I really liked the first two but they dragged out Ezio so much that it really killed my interest and enjoyment of the games. I'll probably just pick it up when it has dropped in price like all the others.

#25 Posted by Sorceror_Swift (535 posts) - - Show Bio

I'll need to get this. If I don't, it'll feel like I'm betraying the franchise. Given that I've completed the other five games.

#26 Posted by YourNeighborhoodComicGeek (20146 posts) - - Show Bio

Are they even Assassin's at that point...

#27 Posted by MonsterStomp (16904 posts) - - Show Bio

Two flints crossing his chest, a flint handle behind him, one in his damn hand. Revelations armor resemblance. Blond hair (long). Clearly a hidden blade on his right forearm, can't really see if thats the second in between the sword hilt and arm brace. Clear pirate theme from behind. Looking down on a potential victim. So glad this guy is actually an assassin unlike Haytham. BTW I really hope he doesn't have Haytham's accent! It was soo posh and no assassin talks like that!

I still have my concerns but my keenness is probably 1.8/10 right now. 10 being lustfully keen, 1 being nothing much.

#28 Posted by Inverno (13197 posts) - - Show Bio

@MonsterStomp said:

Two flints crossing his chest, a flint handle behind him, one in his damn hand. Revelations armor resemblance. Blond hair (long). Clearly a hidden blade on his right forearm, can't really see if thats the second in between the sword hilt and arm brace. Clear pirate theme from behind. Looking down on a potential victim. So glad this guy is actually an assassin unlike Haytham. BTW I really hope he doesn't have Haytham's accent! It was soo posh and no assassin talks like that!

I still have my concerns but my keenness is probably 1.8/10 right now. 10 being lustfully keen, 1 being nothing much.

Very keen, my friend. Personally, his design is alright except for two flints in his chest. Such odd place to keep them...

Also I heard a rumor around that Subject 16 is going to return and he will become the next protagonist in place of Desmond. I heard it from a supposed Ubisoft employee whose friends worked in AC and they let it slip up.

#29 Posted by MonsterStomp (16904 posts) - - Show Bio

@CaioTrubat: Did 16 die ages ago? What are they doing! Haha, na it could work.

#30 Posted by Inverno (13197 posts) - - Show Bio

@MonsterStomp: Not sure if its reliable either. So don't get any hopes :P

#31 Posted by MonsterStomp (16904 posts) - - Show Bio

@CaioTrubat: I won't hold my breathe haha. Though this image does look pretty beast. I agree that the two flints across the chest is a little wierd, fancy, but wierd. Like imagine someone getting the drop on him by firing the flints on his chest. Epic lose.

#32 Posted by JediXMan (30310 posts) - - Show Bio

@CaioTrubat said:

Ugh... Why? Really? Pirates? Just because the naval battles were the one thing everyone agreed to be the best thing in the game (and even that had its problems)? Just because AC III made a better pirate-based game than other recent ones? Now we are going to base a entire game (not a spin-off like Brotherhood or Revelations, but a full installment) on this feature to make more money and please everyone!!! How long does it take for this series to stop being Assassin's Creed and become Pirate's Creed?

Also, this technically sounds like a prequel because the period is set before the American Revolution and Haytham's father Edward Kenway is the protagonist. Why they don't go to the French Revolution, since they foreshadowed it in AC III? Or World War I and II?

I can just feeeeeel the hype radiating from this post.

Moderator
#33 Posted by Inverno (13197 posts) - - Show Bio

@JediXMan said:

@CaioTrubat said:

Ugh... Why? Really? Pirates? Just because the naval battles were the one thing everyone agreed to be the best thing in the game (and even that had its problems)? Just because AC III made a better pirate-based game than other recent ones? Now we are going to base a entire game (not a spin-off like Brotherhood or Revelations, but a full installment) on this feature to make more money and please everyone!!! How long does it take for this series to stop being Assassin's Creed and become Pirate's Creed?

Also, this technically sounds like a prequel because the period is set before the American Revolution and Haytham's father Edward Kenway is the protagonist. Why they don't go to the French Revolution, since they foreshadowed it in AC III? Or World War I and II?

I can just feeeeeel the hype radiating from this post.

Damn right xD

I should have known from the moment I saw that Edward's hoodie has no beak. The series turned unrecognizable at this point.

#34 Posted by ARMIV2 (8432 posts) - - Show Bio

I still have yet to play Assassin's Creed 3, and yet already I wanna jump into this one.

#35 Edited by wario1988 (990 posts) - - Show Bio
#36 Posted by MonsterStomp (16904 posts) - - Show Bio

@wario1988: Doing it CoD style eh? They said they've been working on it for awhile but I guess we'll see from gameplay. I am so freaking worried this won't work out.

#37 Posted by GodOfMischief (641 posts) - - Show Bio

@CaioTrubat: They said that they would never do a game set in either World War. Not sure if I like the setting though, it feels a bit rushed as well to be honest. I'll still buy the game because it's my favourite series.

#38 Edited by KingOfAsh (3579 posts) - - Show Bio

I'd be more interested in the Assassin's Creed series if they...

  1. Get rid of the Animus and all of that modern day business(it completly destroys the imersion)
  2. More actual stealth (not just going in there and stabbing everything with a uniform)

I never got into the series. Iswear that Ubisoft bought out the reviewers just so that they could say Assassin's Creed 3 was the best stealth game of the year and they succeeded. Dishonoured was a lot better anyway.

#39 Posted by Inverno (13197 posts) - - Show Bio
#40 Posted by SHTR (110 posts) - - Show Bio

Not too thrilled about these news either.

#41 Posted by YourNeighborhoodComicGeek (20146 posts) - - Show Bio
#42 Posted by TheGoldenOne (38849 posts) - - Show Bio
@CaioTrubat said:

Ugh... Why? Really? Pirates? Just because the naval battles were the one thing everyone agreed to be the best thing in the game (and even that had its problems)? Just because AC III made a better pirate-based game than other recent ones? Now we are going to base a entire game (not a spin-off like Brotherhood or Revelations, but a full installment) on this feature to make more money and please everyone!!! How long does it take for this series to stop being Assassin's Creed and become Pirate's Creed?

Also, this technically sounds like a prequel because the period is set before the American Revolution and Haytham's father Edward Kenway is the protagonist. Why they don't go to the French Revolution, since they foreshadowed it in AC III? Or World War I and II?

^
#43 Posted by Pyrogram (36414 posts) - - Show Bio

This is too soon. Milking it for all its worth now.

#44 Posted by knightofthechronicle (683 posts) - - Show Bio

@wario1988: Dude thank you so much! I'm a huge fan of AC and this looks awesome.

#45 Posted by BumpyBoo (8505 posts) - - Show Bio

@TheGoldenOne said:

@CaioTrubat said:

Ugh... Why? Really? Pirates? Just because the naval battles were the one thing everyone agreed to be the best thing in the game (and even that had its problems)? Just because AC III made a better pirate-based game than other recent ones? Now we are going to base a entire game (not a spin-off like Brotherhood or Revelations, but a full installment) on this feature to make more money and please everyone!!! How long does it take for this series to stop being Assassin's Creed and become Pirate's Creed?

Also, this technically sounds like a prequel because the period is set before the American Revolution and Haytham's father Edward Kenway is the protagonist. Why they don't go to the French Revolution, since they foreshadowed it in AC III? Or World War I and II?

^
Moderator Online
#46 Posted by Pyrogram (36414 posts) - - Show Bio

@BumpyBoo said:

@TheGoldenOne said:

@CaioTrubat said:

Ugh... Why? Really? Pirates? Just because the naval battles were the one thing everyone agreed to be the best thing in the game (and even that had its problems)? Just because AC III made a better pirate-based game than other recent ones? Now we are going to base a entire game (not a spin-off like Brotherhood or Revelations, but a full installment) on this feature to make more money and please everyone!!! How long does it take for this series to stop being Assassin's Creed and become Pirate's Creed?

Also, this technically sounds like a prequel because the period is set before the American Revolution and Haytham's father Edward Kenway is the protagonist. Why they don't go to the French Revolution, since they foreshadowed it in AC III? Or World War I and II?

^

^

#47 Posted by wario1988 (990 posts) - - Show Bio
#48 Posted by age_of_ultron_Prime2000 (1217 posts) - - Show Bio

Nice

#49 Posted by JonSmith (3996 posts) - - Show Bio
#50 Edited by Strider92 (16261 posts) - - Show Bio

looks good

Online