Thank you all for replies, especially @extremis@maccyd@silent_bomber and @mrdecepticonleader. If you guys would be willing to field a followup question you'll have my undying respect (see what I did there with undying?).
Most of you pointed out that genres like slasher, exorcism, poltergeist type things are a lot more generic than even the more modern takes on the "classic" horror concepts. Do you think these more generic themes/plots help or hinder horror as a genre, or don't really matter? On one hand you have series which can successfully sell 10+ titles, but on the other they're more or less the same movie 10 times. Personally, as someone who came into horror through Edgar Allen Poe, Stephen King, and Alfred Hitchcock I kind of feel like being able to crank out the same story so many times kind of sets the bar low for horror, but at the same time it also makes the really good stuff stand out. What do you guys think?
As I said in my previous post regarding the use of the word generic. I don't find the classic concepts generic. Really, more so popular concepts. That is not to say I don't find specific films, generic/boring. But that is the same within any other genre as well.
As someone who is a fan of the slasher genre overall, I feel that the slasher sub genre itself should be laid to rest. But the issue is with current horror films, is that nothing new is really coming out. We are "treated" to the constant stream of ghost and exorcism type films which I find boring and am not a fan of overall. And of course the torture porn which is the newest sub genre is still in full swing. So if we are to have the same sub genres be persistent (all of which I feel should be cut back as well) as opposed to anything new and fresh coming out, then I would rather see films in genres I do enjoy like the slasher be released. Though there really aren't too many recent slasher films that have come out, recently, so the genre has not being as strong as it was back in the 80's. And that is alright. I just wish more sub genres would follow suit.
Another thing you have to bear in mind especially when you are talking about the slasher sub genre, is that it gave new faces to the genre. The majority of the modern horror icons are slashers, Jason, Freddy, Michael, Leatherface, Chucky, Ghostface etc. They are to the horror genre, that Batman, Superman, Spiderman, Hulk etc are to the superhero genre. And with that since they are icons, they have made their marks on horror film history then they will likely continue in some form. And as I ranted on about Seed of Chucky here: http://www.comicvine.com/forums/off-topic-5/a-month-of-horror-week-one-wrap-up-review-1502860/ Shameless plug. I realize that we will always likely end up with sequels/remakes/reboots from these characters. Because they are brand to an extent. And that is okay I get that. It won't stop me from ranting about how horrible they are. And of course it won't stop completely new takes on horror coming out either.
The fact is that the slasher sub genre as I said did most of the work in the 80's and it raised the bar. And as someone who is a fan of the sub genre and who has an appreciation for it I would say it is easily among the good stuff. Not every film of course. But still it stands there just as tall as any works by King or Poe or any other horror works.
Log in to comment