@sog7dc: You are making it about abortion though, and not abandonment, you're using abandonment as the excuse to talk about abortion. Every time someone says "take responsibility" you do reply with something about abortion. I know what your beliefs are because I've seen your posts throughout the board over the course of the summer. Which is why this thread is progressing just as I thought it would and that is why as soon as someone mentioned responsibility, I replied with the "So it begins" .gif.
When a child is born, it is not required by law for a man to have anything to do with the child other than to provide child support. If the concern is simply financial, a better proposal would be to set up programs for fathers who are unable to properly maintain a life while paying for child support or are simply unable to pay for child support. If a father would want to relinquish everything to do with this child for some for of ambiguous reason, the case should be reviewed separately.
I've erred in no way. I'm just pointing out certain things. But since you've once again graced us with an explanation on your beliefs, I will grace you with mine. I believe people shouldn't be quick to forge an opinion or take a stance on something without reviewing everything that encompasses certain situations, and in cases like this, where no exact situation has been given, I am surprised so many people have been able to go, "I think this is..."
This proposal is short-sighted, incomplete, and chuck full of propaganda because it works on the premise that abortion is just a mechanic to avoid responsibility. Generalizing things, especially in delicate situations such as this, is more or less useless.
As long as you keep replying to people that say this isn't okay with things about abortion, I will see this thread as nothing more than a bait thread to get people to argue about their stance on abortions, and if that is the case, there are various threads for that.
Log in to comment