12 hours to Martial Law

turoksonofstone

15045

Forum Posts

279813

Wiki Points

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 24

Edited By turoksonofstone

Senate Passes National Guard Empowerment

WASHINGTON, Nov. 29, 2011 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/

-- Legislation would add Guard officer to Joint Chiefs

The National Guard community -- nearly 500,000 men and women in uniform strong plus hundreds of thousands of family members and retirees -- today is hailing Senate approval of legislation that would add a Guard voice to the nation's senior panel of military advisors. The bill, which was introduced by Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., was added by voice vote Monday night to the Senate's version of the fiscal 2012 defense authorization bill ( S. 1867 ). The names of 70 senators were on the amendment as sponsors. Among its provisions is language to give the Guard's senior officer, the chief of the National Guard Bureau, a seat on the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The House approved similar language in May. This means the measure now only needs Senate approval of the defense authorization bill and final congressional consent of the comprehensive defense bill to be sent to President Barack Obama, who promised to add the Guard to the Joint Chiefs in his 2008 campaign. "Last night brings us one step closer

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/senate ... 2011-11-29

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sQhTVz5IjQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sQhTVz5IjQ

Senate to Declare Open Season Hunting on Americans

S.1867 includes these provisions highlighted by the ACLU.

If enacted, sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA would:

1) Explicitly authorize the federal government to indefinitely imprison without charge or trial American citizens and others picked up inside and outside theUnited States;

(2) Mandate military detention of some civilians who would otherwise be outside of military control, including civilians picked up within the United States itself; and

(3) Transfer to the Department of Defense core prosecutorial, investigative, law enforcement, penal, and custodial authority and responsibility now held by the Department of Justice.

The Washington Post of course did its part to make sure it appeared this bill was about “terrorists”, who could be held indefinitely, who could be subject to extraordinary rendition (transferred to countries like Egypt for extensive torture) and glossed over or totally avoided mentioning the fact that the provisions of this bill could be applied, and are actually intended to be applied to US citizens on US soil.

The language of the bill is intentionally very broadly written to allow later interpretations that will be used to redefine yet again, our rights, our protections, striking each one down under the false flag use of “the war of terror”.

In the last several years we have seen the militarization of our local law enforcement under the direction of Homeland Security. We now have major US cities armed with military tanks, drones, and outfitted like star wars storm troopers; all for use against US citizens in their own communities. Local law enforcement has been remade into extended military units to enable them to become a working military unit in tandem with military control. These law enforcement units have ceased operating as “protect and serve” civil service operations and instead have become direct threats to the communities which are forced to endure them. The escalating violence against the citizens, the abrogation of rights, the violation of standing laws and the protection provided to these units by the courts should have us all demanding an end to Homeland Security interference in local law enforcement activities and reverting law enforcement back to one of community protection and service.

We have seen the creation of the White House Rural Council along with other newly created agencies that all include the military as part of their structure. This is no accident. There is no plausible reason the military would be included in any Council making preparations to unlawfully enter into the states, unless military action against the citizenry was anticipated.

S.1867 is a catch all bill. Its intention is to make legal (not lawful) the crime of unlawful detention without due process. By extension, the bill would condone the practice of extraordinary rendition for the purpose of torture of US citizens who could be kidnapped from our streets without being charged with a crime, having access to the courts for redress (the bill condones the military holding tribunals outside of the US court system at its discretion) and holding US citizens indefinitely without charging them with any crime.

This bill is one of the final steps necessary in striking down any remaining Constitutional protections or rights, all under the phony war of terror being perpetrated by our own government against its own citizens. This is not a right or left, Democrat or Republican plan……they are all in it together. They will all vote for it together knowing full well that it is an assault on the people of the US.

In my opinion, it is an open declaration of war against the people by our own government.

This brings us back to the initial question:

If ordered to do so, would our own military turn on us?

It appears they would.
And here is what the government defines as terrorist

The problem is, according to numerous law enforcement advisories, training manuals, seminars and other literature, the federal government defines political activism, flying American flags, wearing Levi jeans, being nice, looking “normal” and going scuba diving all as signs of domestic terror.

By encouraging Americans to “report suspicious activity” that includes such behavior, the feds are knowingly on a mission to chill political dissent, by making people afraid to exercise their constitutional rights in the fear that their neighbors will turn them in to the authorities unless they rigidly control their behavior and don’t risk even patently benign activities being misconstrued.

The following is a list of behaviors, actions or interests that the federal government, via centralized threat fusion centers that collate such information, considers to be potential signs of terrorism under the MIAC Report.

- Displaying bumper stickers and other paraphernalia associated with the Constitutional, Campaign for Liberty, and Libertarian parties

- Supporting Congressman Ron Paul

- Supporting former presidential candidate Chuck Baldwin

- Supporting former Congressman Bob Barr

- Opposing the implementation of a North American Union

- Owning gold bullion

- Displaying historical U.S. flags

- Opposing abortion

- Talking about the documentary Zeitgeist

According to an earlier document issued by the Joint Terrorism Task Force (page 1 – page 2), the following behaviors, actions or interests are also signs of terrorism.

- Being interested in animal rights

- Being a “lone individual”

- Making numerous references to the U.S. Constitution

- Defending the U.S. Constitution

- Claiming driving is a right, not a privilege

- Refusing to identify yourself to an authority figure

- Attempting to monitor the actions of police

A d v e r t i s e m e n t

- Being bald

Under the terms of a A Texas Department of Public Safety Criminal Law Enforcement pamphlet, the following behaviors, actions or interests are also signs of terrorism.

- Being a “nice guy”

- Wearing Levi jeans

- Communicating predominantly by cell phone, email or text message

- Looking “normal” in appearance

- Renting a car

- Staying in a hotel or apartment

- Renting a storage facility

- Using cash to make large purchases

- Using pre-paid cellphones or hand-held radios

- Owning large amounts of medicines, alcohol, or baby formula

- Gaining support for a cause by holding meetings, public rallies, or demonstrations

- Gaining support for a cause by using websites, posters, leaflets, or underground press publications

- Possessing a photo-copy of your drivers license, passport, social security card or birth certificate

- Possessing or purchasing GPS technology

- Walking, biking or driving near “potential targets”

- Taking photographs of “potential targets,” including bridges, power plants or government buildings

Under the terms of a Virginia training manual used to help state employees recognize terrorists, the following behaviors, actions or interests are also signs of terrorism.

- Being a property-rights activist

- Trying to influence government or social policy

- Undermining confidence in the government

- Using a sketch pad, camera, map, binoculars or scuba equipment

Sen. John McCain and Sen. Carl Levin
http://www.allgov.com/Top_Stories/ViewNews/Senate_Bill_Allows_Indefinite_Imprisonment_of_Americans_without_Trial_111129

AN UPDATE ON THE BILL: On 11/28/11 a cloture motion was made on the bill. A CLOTURE is the only procedure by which the Senate can vote to place a time limit on consideration of a bill or other matter, and thereby overcome a filibuster. Under the cloture rule (Rule XXII), the Senate may limit consideration of a pending matter to 30 additional hours. It looks as if we have another day to make phone calls.

Udall CO. amendment shot down!

Well Paul's is up for vote next.....sad day in America, again.

Undall's amendment was for striking certain terror detainee language from bill S 1867. Yea -37 Nay -61
all the nays should be shot!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8tWt4_0M4M

all the nays should be shot!

Violence is what they want so they can kick off martial law.

Good odds when nation wide martial law goes down they will try
to seize all firearms and good odds that will kick off civil war 2.

So be careful what you wish for, you might get it.

When the shooting starts I will be heading for the hills,
and doing my best to hide, I don't plan on shooting because
it among other things will give away your position.

No matter how good you might be, air superiority will win.

If your wanting to be a hero then I respect your decision, but
I will not be going down that fantasy road.

The made for TV view of war is just a fantasy, save maybe
coming ashore on Omaha Beach in saving Private Ryan, that was pretty close.
US: Senate To Vote On Legislation That Allows U.S. Military to Detain Americans Without Charge or Trial

The Senate is gearing up for a vote on Monday or Tuesday that goes to the very heart of who we are as Americans. The Senate will be voting on a bill that will direct American military resources not at an enemy shooting at our military in a war zone, but at American citizens and other civilians far from any battlefield - even people in the United States itself.

...

The Senate is going to vote on whether Congress will give this president - and every future president - the power to order the military to pick up and imprison without charge or trial civilians anywhere in the world.

Once signed into law the President (or anyone of his minions within the Justice Department or Homeland Security acting on his behalf) can issue orders to arrest, detain and imprison an American citizen in the United States without due process. Since most terror arrests fall into the realm of national security, and therefore are secret, no evidence would ever need to be presented for the permanent detainment (and who knows what else) of an American imprisoned under this law.

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/23813 ... tion-Tha.. .
-
article brought to my attention by youtubes traitorsbeware
-
The worldwide indefinite detention without charge or trial provision is in S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act bill, which will be on the Senate floor on Monday. The bill was drafted in secret by Sens. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) and passed in a closed-door committee meeting, without even a single hearing.

Alex Breaks Down McCain-Graham S.3081 (the 1st time they tried march 2010) Indefinite Detention & Torture Bill on The Alex Jones Show
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Anm4QMfiME4
surprised, no one cares enough to even comment -or is it shock?

Quote:
Senate Passes National Guard Empowerment

WASHINGTON, Nov. 29, 2011 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Legislation would add Guard officer to Joint Chiefs

The National Guard community -- nearly 500,000 men and women in uniform strong plus hundreds of thousands of family members and retirees -- today is hailing Senate approval of legislation that would add a Guard voice to the nation's senior panel of military advisors. The bill, which was introduced by Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., was added by voice vote Monday night to the Senate's version of the fiscal 2012 defense authorization bill ( S. 1867). The names of 70 senators were on the amendment as sponsors. Among its provisions is language to give the Guard's senior officer, the chief of the National Guard Bureau, a seat on the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The House approved similar language in May. This means the measure now only needs Senate approval of the defense authorization bill and final congressional consent of the comprehensive defense bill to be sent to President Barack Obama, who promised to add the Guard to the Joint Chiefs in his 2008 campaign. "Last night brings us one step closer

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/senate ... 2011-11-29

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... cKw_MOKAyE
This is crazy and you thought John McCain was a patriot and American Hero.We are officially the enemy now!
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc ... ully/37116

Why is the national security community treating the "Enemy Belligerent, Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010," introduced by Sens. John McCain and Joseph Lieberman on Thursday as a standard proposal, as a simple response to the administration's choices in the aftermath of the Christmas Day bombing attempt? A close reading of the bill suggests it would allow the U.S. military to detain U.S. citizens without trial indefinitely in the U.S. based on suspected activity. Read the bill here, and then read the summarized points after the jump.
According to the summary, the bill sets out a comprehensive policy for the detention, interrogation and trial of suspected enemy belligerents who are believed to have engaged in hostilities against the United States by requiring these individuals to be held in military custody, interrogated for their intelligence value and not provided with a Miranda warning.

(There is no distinction between U.S. persons--visa holders or citizens--and non-U.S. persons.)

It would require these "belligerents" to be coded as "high-value detainee[s]" to be held in military custody and interrogated for their intelligence value by a High-Value Detainee Interrogation Team established by the president. (The H.I.G., of course, was established to bring a sophisticated interrogation capacity to the federal justice system.)

Any suspected unprivileged enemy belligerents considered a "high-value detainee" shall not be provided with a Miranda warning.

The bill asks the President to determine criteria for designating an individual as a "high-value detainee" if he/she: (1) poses a threat of an attack on civilians or civilian facilities within the U.S. or U.S. facilities abroad; (2) poses a threat to U.S. military personnel or U.S. military facilities; (3) potential intelligence value; (4) is a member of al Qaeda or a terrorist group affiliated with al Qaeda or (5) such other matters as the President considers appropriate. The President must submit the regulations and guidance to the appropriate committees of Congress no later than 60 days after enactment.

To the extent possible, the High-Value Detainee Interrogation Team must make a preliminary determination whether the detainee is an unprivileged enemy belligerent within 48 hours of taking detainee into custody.

The High-Value Detainee Interrogation Team must submit its determination to the Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General after consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. The Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General make a final determination and report the determination to the President and the appropriate committees of Congress. In the case of any disagreement between the Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General, the President will make the determination.

Note that the president himself doesn't get to make the call.
FAIR USE NOTICE.
Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, . http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

12 years ago

difficlus

10659

Forum Posts

3482

Wiki Points

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Edited By difficlus

Do you seriously expect me to read all of that? Can't you make it short and sweet? First video was enough to sum up the title...

12 years ago

utotheg38

19295

Forum Posts

Wiki Points

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Edited By utotheg38

@difficlus said:

Do you seriously expect me to read all of that? Can't you make it short and sweet? First video was enough to sum up the title...

lol why not?

The only limitation is yourself.

12 years ago

difficlus

10659

Forum Posts

3482

Wiki Points

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Edited By difficlus

@turoksonofstone: Just read it pretty scary for you Americans, that's why i can't ever live in a country like that.

@utotheg38 said:

@difficlus said:
Do you seriously expect me to read all of that? Can't you make it short and sweet? First video was enough to sum up the title...
lol why not?
The only limitation is yourself.

I suppose you read it all eh? ^__-

12 years ago

utotheg38

19295

Forum Posts

Wiki Points

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Edited By utotheg38

@difficlus said:

@turoksonofstone: Just read it pretty scary for you Americans, that's why i can't ever live in a country like that.
@utotheg38 said:
@difficlus said:
Do you seriously expect me to read all of that? Can't you make it short and sweet? First video was enough to sum up the title...
lol why not?
The only limitation is yourself.
I suppose you read it all eh? ^__-

LOL Yes, Yes I Did. XD

12 years ago