If he was cast as Fett, I wouldn't mind at all.
What do you think?
Do you have a better choice?
@deathstroke52: It can work out. He would be great as Hal Jordan.
No, the movies tell he is a Jango Fett clone, besides since he doesnt need a face, it would be better to give the role to some one that could do more with the role and get Temuera Morrison to give him the voice.
No, the movies tell he is a Jango Fett clone, besides since he doesnt need a face, it would be better to give the role to some one that could do more with the role and get Temuera Morrison to give him the voice.
Maybe in his solo movie they'll actually show his face.
No, the movies tell he is a Jango Fett clone, besides since he doesnt need a face, it would be better to give the role to some one that could do more with the role and get Temuera Morrison to give him the voice.
Maybe in his solo movie they'll actually show his face.
Boba Fett helmet is his face.
Its like the man with no name in Clint Eastwood movies, No Name was his name.
This should be a Darth Vader one actor plays the body and another the voice.
No, the movies tell he is a Jango Fett clone, besides since he doesnt need a face, it would be better to give the role to some one that could do more with the role and get Temuera Morrison to give him the voice.
Maybe in his solo movie they'll actually show his face.
Boba Fett helmet is his face.
Its like the man with no name in Clint Eastwood movies, No Name was his name.
This should be a Darth Vader one actor plays the body and another the voice.
But don't you think they would show his face in maybe a few scenes?
@deathstroke52: No, "Darth Vader" only shows his face in the last scene and that was because he was dying and it had a reason in the plot, he was Anakin Skywalker again, not Darth Vader.
With Boba Fett you dont have that, Boba Fett face is his helmet and he doesnt change who he is because of it.
No need to take out his helmet.
Like there is no need to Clint Eastwood character to have a name.
Its the reason Dreed never shows his face in his past movie.
@deathstroke52: No, "Darth Vader" only shows his face in the last scene and that was because he was dying and it had a reason in the plot, he was Anakin Skywalker again, not Darth Vader.
With Boba Fett you dont have that, Boba Fett face is his helmet and he doesnt change who he is because of it.
No need to take out his helmet.
Like there is no need to Clint Eastwood character to have a name.
Its the reason Dreed never shows his face in his past movie.
It wouldn't make the film worse if we saw his face though.
@deathstroke52: It betrays who Boba Fett is, its like if you are making a Halo movie and you give Master Chief a face, because it humanize him.
Boba Fett has a real face and is his helmet.
This isnt Batman, where you have Bruce Wayne.
Boba Fett doesnt have an alias, his mask is who he is.
@deathstroke52: It betrays who Boba Fett is, its like if you are making a Halo movie and you give Master Chief a face, because it humanize him.
Boba Fett has a real face and is his helmet.
This isnt Batman, where you have Bruce Wayne.
Boba Fett doesnt have an alias, his mask is who he is.
I wouldn't really say it betrays who he is, but I guess I can agree with you.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment