@darkagekiller:
1. Yes DC did give some of the bat family books good writers, but they also let other people explore lesser known characters and expand on their role in the DCU at large. If you had told me when the New 52 was first announced that characters like Swamp Thing, Animal Man, and Jonah Hex were going to be some of DC's strongest opening moves to attract new readers I would have called you crazy as all of them are bit complicated and not really new reader accessible and the fact that DC took the risk with them is great.
2. DC gave Supes to writers they thought could shape him in interesting ways for new readers and would be able to create stories that are new reader accessible Morrison in particular had just completely redefined Batman and it's no surprise they'd want him to do something similar with Superman. They took a risk and it didn't pay off, but the other risks they've made like with completely resetting the Earth 2 characters have payed off. You win some and lose some, that's how business works.
3. It's not that DC is unorganized, it's that certain editors are unorganized. The fact that the Bat-family books have a good flow in between them and that all of the JL-Dark books work well together is because of good editors. The fact that the Super-family books don't flow is because of poor editing. Marvel has the same problem. Certain family of books flow well together, certain ones don't. It all depends on who's overseeing that family of books and the amount of control they give creators.
4. Meh, nto really something to hate the entirety of DC comics over. Art is a hit-or-miss medium that is very personal to people. Choosing two books and deciding whether or not that speaks for the rest of the company at large is kind of dumb. I could be saying that Marvel sucks because Greg Land and JRJR are still allowed to work on major titles. If anything the latest issue of Action Comics showed that the Superman costume can be drawn well.
Log in to comment