#1 Edited by phantom1527 (403 posts) - - Show Bio

Why Blade is the oddest character in Marvel Comics

The character of Blade was created by comic book writer extraordinaire Marv Wolfman in 1973 within the “Tomb of Dracula” story arch. He was created as a English-born vampire hunter who’s mother was bitten by a vampire, Deacon Frost, during her pregnancy. This turned Blade into a non-aging human that was immune to vampire bites. In this first incarnation, Blade was an adequately skilled member of a vampire hunting team that did ultimately take down Dracula. Oh, and he also wore green leather pants with disco boots (see Luke Cage and other comic book characters created during the Blaxploitation era). During his run in the 80’s and 90’s his skills progressed to the point where he was capable enough a “superhero” to join the Midnight Suns, which was Dr. Strange’s version of the Avengers in a sense. Soon after this, his stint with the Nightstalkers (a trio of vampire hunters) ended and Blade became just another one of Marvel’s thousands of characters in its universe.

By the mid-90’s the character looked as if he would never be relevant again. But then he appeared in a two-part episode in “Spiderman The Animated Series” and, despite the cheesiness of the show, made him a somewhat cool and respectable character. They gave him the powers of vampires without their weaknesses (not just that BS immune to bite nonsense) and gave him a mentor-type figure, Whistler, who provided him with wisdom and advanced technology and weaponry. I’ll admit the motorcycle that scaled skyscrapers and green lightsaber were a bit much, but the characterization of Blade in the two episodes made him seem like an actual superhero that was on the level of a Spiderman (they never actually fought, but his combination of vampire-level attributes and advanced weaponry gave the impression they were in the same league).

And this is where it gets odd.

In 1998 Blade got his own feature length movie with arguably the 90’s most charismatic action star, Wesley Snipes, the year after the colossal bomb that was “Batman and Robin”. In this incarnation, Blade has the same powers as the Spiderman the Animated Series Incarnation! I don’t think a comic book character with at least a 20 year run has ever had their powers completely replaced from the source material in their very own live action movie ever. That’s like giving Deadpool Cyclop’s powers in his first live action movie appearance (Damn X-Men Origins: Wolverine).

Then an even odder thing occurred. The movie did extremely well! The movie made close to $200 million (adjusted for inflation) the year after “Batman and Robin” nearly killed the superhero movie genre. An after thought within the comic book character world saved the entire genre and helped green-light movies like “X-Men” and “Spiderman” which then led to the billion dollar blockbusters “Avengers” and the Dark Knight Trilogy. Wesley Snipes transformed Blade into a boring superhero with no real powers to a legitimate badass that was skilled and powerful enough to kill a vampire God! The movie did so well, that it spawned two more sequels. The second movie was a pretty good superhero movie considering it was made in 2001 and made over $200 million dollars (adjusted for inflation) with a budget of less that $75 million dollars. The second sequel was a dud, yet still brought in nearly $160 million (adjusted for inflation) with only an $80 million dollar budget. The success of the cinematic trilogy led to two video games on the major consoles, a television series and an anime series nearly a decade later.

Following the success on screen, Marvel gave Blade within the 616 comic book universe the appearance, powers and overall characterization of his cinematic counter part. This was the logical decision, but was executed terribly.

First, their decision to give him actual vampiric powers by a bite from Morbius was weak. He is supposed to be immune to all vampire bites, whether they be via science or mystical origins. Blade’s presence within the comics before the movies was not that significant therefore they could have easily gotten away with rebooting the comic book series altogether and giving him all of the powers without the weaknesses and establishing Whistler as his own version of Alfred/Lucius Fox. They also could have established him as more of charismatic/badass African-American like Wesley Snipes rather than an Englishman.

Second, they completely mismanaged his powers. This is common in comics (Werewolf by Night was able to strangle the Hulk, but nearly died against Sabretooth), but all of these inconsistencies happened in a standard 12-24 issue story arch. In this line of comics, Blade was able to overpower and outmaneuver a boosted Spiderman (via vampire bite) and was able to pull the head off an extremely powerful vampire, Draconis, with his bare hands, yet was outmaneuvered and knocked off his feet by Gambit and wasn’t able to break free from an every-day chain. Furthermore, Blade fought Wolverine to a stalemate and was able to take three claws through the brain and not be phased, yet couldn’t regrow his hand after having to gnaw it off. Let’s also not forget the fact that Blade easily defeated Dracula, yet Dracula has defeated the whole X-Men team single handedly. Power inconsistencies are common, but usually aren’t this apparent in the same story-arch and usually occur when writers don’t want an iconic character with little powers (Captain America, Punisher etc) to get wiped out by a more powerful, but less significant character. In this arch, Blade beats and cures Spiderman, Stalemates Wolverine, but gets outclassed by Gambit. This is illogical on so many levels.

The main reason the Blade comics following the movie failed though, were due to the lazy writing. The dialogue was boring, Blade didn’t have a third of the charisma Snipes portrayed the character with, and there was no real story or character progression. In the movies Blade was complex because he was the thing that he hunted with such passion. He was his own worse enemy. There was none of that in this incarnation. He just went along killing vampires as if he were a robot. There was no link to his impoverished past (his mother was a hooker and was born homeless), his race, how his powers affect his humanity or anything that could be alluded to. The character with so much potential went nowhere and wasn’t even renewed.

There are currently rumors that a Blade reboot could come within Phase 3 or later since monster movies are even more popular than they were when the trilogy came out, but they are just rumors.

The weirdness that comes from Blade’s character is the fact that he might be the most popular character comic book character among characters whose comics are irrelevant and poor quality.

#2 Edited by AssertingValor (5382 posts) - - Show Bio

I am not reading all that

#3 Posted by GrenadeFlow (1373 posts) - - Show Bio

Comic blade is dull

#4 Posted by Jonny_Anonymous (32861 posts) - - Show Bio

There is absolutely no need to Americanize everything, that needs to be squashed right now.

#5 Posted by SlimJ87D (9348 posts) - - Show Bio

I am not reading all that

If there were scans and images I would have haha.

Online
#6 Posted by phantom1527 (403 posts) - - Show Bio

@jonny_anonymous: I usually agree with that; It was just a suggestion since they failed to give the comic version the charisma and personality that made the movie entertaining.

#7 Posted by AssertingValor (5382 posts) - - Show Bio
#8 Posted by ChildoftheAtom (488 posts) - - Show Bio

I'm surprised blade is not more popular with general media and people.( not comics) . I thought the 1st and 2nd movie were almost as good as the matrix one and 2, action wise they were equal.

IMO with a flash and justice league coming around the corner in a few years I think marvel should put blade into his own movie to really showcase what marvel does best. Cool, characterized, Heros like blade would take so many viewers. With netflix producing tv shows for daredevil, luke cage and iron fist I can't imagine punisher and blade not showing up a few times.

#9 Posted by cattlebattle (12586 posts) - - Show Bio

All of that is very true.

The Blade franchise was an anomaly.

Online
#10 Posted by Experio (14310 posts) - - Show Bio

Which is why I find him a little boring.

#11 Posted by AssertingValor (5382 posts) - - Show Bio

@cattlebattle: I believe if blade was written better that he could be as popular as batman

#12 Posted by KingAres109 (1252 posts) - - Show Bio

Nice blog bro...It is surprising that minor characters and supporting ones get more screen time than popular characters.

#13 Posted by RogueShadow (10031 posts) - - Show Bio

I am not reading all that

LOL. My instant reaction.

#14 Edited by cattlebattle (12586 posts) - - Show Bio

@cattlebattle: I believe if blade was written better that he could be as popular as batman

I don't know about that. The thing that hinders Blades popularity or at least one thing that does is that the whole premise has been done to death. There is like 60 animes that have the same plot and and a lot of literary characters that were similar as well.

Online
#15 Posted by phantom1527 (403 posts) - - Show Bio

@lordmaverick: That's a stretch, but I do think that if Blade was written well it could be Marvel's most popular dark/mystical character. I also think incorporating him in guest star appearances with major characters as a superhero rather than just a vampire hunter could do the character some good.

#16 Posted by AllStarSuperman (20228 posts) - - Show Bio

@slimj87d said:

@lordmaverick said:

I am not reading all that

If there were scans and images I would have haha.

Online
#17 Posted by AllStarSuperman (20228 posts) - - Show Bio

@phantom1527: nice blog, I really love the blade movies, but I am dissapointed to hear his comics suck, as I was kinda interested in getting them

Nice blog bro...It is surprising that minor characters and supporting ones get more screen time than popular characters.

What about Wonder Woman....

Online
#18 Posted by phantom1527 (403 posts) - - Show Bio

@allstarsuperman: Wonder Woman to some extent is in the opposite situation as Blade. She has a huge following from her comic books, yet can't get her own movie. Blade's comics have been pretty bad and attracted a very limited following yet he got 2 good movies and 1 POS movie. I understand where you're coming from about characters less meaningful than her getting screen time though.

#19 Posted by KingAres109 (1252 posts) - - Show Bio
#20 Posted by Guardiandevil83 (5342 posts) - - Show Bio

@kingares109: No. His response was that she hasn't been in any movies.

#21 Posted by AllStarSuperman (20228 posts) - - Show Bio
Online
#22 Posted by Jonny_Anonymous (32861 posts) - - Show Bio

@lordmaverick said:

@cattlebattle: I believe if blade was written better that he could be as popular as batman

I don't know about that. The thing that hinders Blades popularity or at least one thing that does is that the whole premise has been done to death. There is like 60 animes that have the same plot and and a lot of literary characters that were similar as well.

it isn't anymore over done than superheroes themselves

#23 Edited by KingAres109 (1252 posts) - - Show Bio
#24 Posted by cattlebattle (12586 posts) - - Show Bio

it isn't anymore over done than superheroes themselves

The super hero genre does have many cliches, but they usually all have many differences as well among the different heroes. Blade is almost indistinguishable from a lot of other fictional characters that hunt vampires, and also happens to be vampires themselves, well, except for him being black.

Online
#25 Edited by Jonny_Anonymous (32861 posts) - - Show Bio

@jonny_anonymous said:

it isn't anymore over done than superheroes themselves

The super hero genre does have many cliches, but they usually all have many differences as well among the different heroes. Blade is almost indistinguishable from a lot of other fictional characters that hunt vampires, and also happens to be vampires themselves, well, except for him being black.

Come on dude, superhero fiction is one of the most cliched genre of fiction ever.

#26 Posted by JediXMan (29662 posts) - - Show Bio
#27 Posted by cattlebattle (12586 posts) - - Show Bio

Come on dude, superhero fiction is one of the most cliched genre of fiction ever.

Meh, I could count more animes and fictional characters that are specifically just like Blade, even down to hunting vampires with a sword, then I can name characters based on Superman or Spider-Man in those genres.

Online
#28 Posted by Jonny_Anonymous (32861 posts) - - Show Bio

@jonny_anonymous said:

Come on dude, superhero fiction is one of the most cliched genre of fiction ever.

Meh, I could count more animes and fictional characters that are specifically just like Blade, even down to hunting vampires with a sword, then I can name characters based on Superman or Spider-Man in those genres.

So your saying you can name more vampire hunters than superheroes?

#29 Edited by cattlebattle (12586 posts) - - Show Bio

Meh, I could count more animes and fictional characters that are specifically just like Blade, even down to hunting vampires with a sword, then I can name characters based on Superman or Spider-Man in those genres.

So your saying you can name more vampire hunters than superheroes?

Nah, lol, I can name characters in other genres, whether it be video games or anime that are basically just like Blade and are probably more popular, of you recall a couple of posts ago, is what I indicated what might hinder his success. I can't really do that with someone like Wolverine or Batman. Do you get me??

Online
#30 Edited by GraniteSoldier (6999 posts) - - Show Bio

I actually preferred Blade in his movie incarnation than his comic one. Much like how I feel about Iron Man, I prefer RDJr's Iron Man persona over that of the comics.

Online