@bierschneeman said:
I don;'t mean temporarily like certain so called "evil wins" batman arcs, I mean EVIL WINS... hands down. no buts, no final justice. Evil wins irrevocably changing things... for good.
That's actually really hard to define imo. I can think of comics where the bad guy wins but I wouldn't call it irrevocably for good. Aside from the complete destruction of the world how can any victory be truly irrevocable? Reminds me kind of Watchmen where the nominal "villain" wins and causes a catastrophe of unprecedented proportions yet it's still left ambiguous as to whether he actually achieved anything at all.
you have actually illustrated my problem pretty well, sure they might lash out, or they might end up killing a superhero, but their end goal, beit conquer the world, or robbing everybank in Gotham in alphabetical order, Is ALWAYS foiled. you don't win a war by killing a bunch of people or destroying lots of infrastructure, so why is this considered a Supervillain 'WIN"?
Tony Stark had a goal, pass, enforce, and support the Registration act. He won, at the end of the storyarc, he accomplished his goals without someone trouncing in to saved the day, the supervillain wins. He managed to even change the comic line up because of his victory.
but this seems to be the only one out there.
Sinestro comes to mind. at the end of Sinestro Corps war, when we think ...HA he lost. he tries to play it off as a win, as if all he wanted was to change the Book of OA, then later he comes across as a Harbringer of BLACKEST NIGHT, or is it that he is trying to protect the universe from BLACKEST NIGHT, its so ambiguous, and reeks of poor sportsmenship and bad planning, I have a hard time calling this a win, AT ALL. (NUH UH, I won because I wasn't trying to actually beat you.....wait, what??)
Log in to comment