What is the Best Batman Movie?
For me, Batman Begins.
i concur,
- Batman Returns
- Batman 89'
- Dark Knight
- Begins
- ----Big Gap----
- Rises
- Batman and Robin (I prefer Arnie hamming it up to Jim Carrey)
- Batman Forever
Its a tough call. The Burton films are good, but they aren't really about Batman. The Schumacher films are not good.
Batman Begins feels like it takes a long time to get anywhere. The Dark Knight seems to be more of a morality driven, crime thriller than a Batman movie, and the Dark Knight Rises is a messy movie in itself. Not that they are bad, just that they don't feel like Batman from the comics
I think the animated movies are better Batman films (Under the Red Hood, The Dark Knight Returns etc.)
Its a tough call. The Burton films are good, but they aren't really about Batman.
I felt this way too up until a few days ago, but after Googling a lot of stuff its turns out that its not so cut and dry.
Some things I didn't realise for instance were that Catwoman's original origin was that she was a normal woman who accidentally smacked her head hard and had a complete personality change as a result, and there's a Penguin story where he straps rockets to penguin's backs (albeit they're duds in this story), Penguin running for mayor is an homage of one of the Adam West episodes.
Batman 89 is actually very, very accurate, but its almost wholly based on Golden Age Batman from the 40s, the only major change they actually made was to merge the Joker origin with Batman's (which the writer later said was done against his will when he was absent), everything else actually follows the first 40 issues quite closely at times.
An argument can be made that
Tim Burton Batman = Golden Age Batman
Batman and Robin = 1960s Batman
Batman Forever = 1970s Batman
Nolan Batman = Contemporary Batman (mainly Jeph Loeb + early Frank Millar)
Its a tough call. The Burton films are good, but they aren't really about Batman.
I felt this way too up until a few days ago, but after Googling a lot of stuff its turns out that its not so cut and dry.
Some things I didn't realise for instance were that Catwoman's original origin was that she was a normal woman who accidentally smacked her head hard and had a complete personality change as a result, and there's a Penguin story where he straps rockets to penguin's backs (albeit they're duds in this story), Penguin running for mayor is an homage of one of the Adam West episodes.
Batman 89 is actually very, very accurate, but its almost wholly based on Golden Age Batman from the 40s, the only major change they actually made was to merge the Joker origin with Batman's (which the writer later said was done against his will when he was absent), everything else actually follows the first 40 issues quite closely at times
Thats good to know. Thanks.
Although I was talking about the movies themselves. The plot and focus of Burtons movies seem to be more about the villains and their interactions and performances than the character of Batman.
Its a tough call. The Burton films are good, but they aren't really about Batman.
I felt this way too up until a few days ago, but after Googling a lot of stuff its turns out that its not so cut and dry.
Some things I didn't realise for instance were that Catwoman's original origin was that she was a normal woman who accidentally smacked her head hard and had a complete personality change as a result, and there's a Penguin story where he straps rockets to penguin's backs (albeit they're duds in this story), Penguin running for mayor is an homage of one of the Adam West episodes.
Batman 89 is actually very, very accurate, but its almost wholly based on Golden Age Batman from the 40s, the only major change they actually made was to merge the Joker origin with Batman's (which the writer later said was done against his will when he was absent), everything else actually follows the first 40 issues quite closely at times
That's good to know. Thanks.
Although I was talking about the movies themselves. The plot and focus of Burtons movies seem to be more about the villains and their interactions and performances than the character of Batman.
Ah ok, I get what you're saying.
For me personally Burton has enough Bruce/Batman scenes, but I can't deny that he puts more focus on the villains.
Batman Begins.
Batman Begins.
you sirs are awesome.
@allstarsuperman: Thanks for noticing. Lol.
Batman and Robin.... JK
Don't clobber me with blunt sticks...
Batman Begins first, '89 and The Dark Knight tie for second. Rises gets the bronze.
@allstarsuperman: hey don't forget me :)
- Dark Knight/Batman Begins, both are really good and I fluctuate over which I like more
- Batman 1989
- Batman Forever - I'm sure someone will laugh at this but damn it I loved Tommy Lee Jones' Two-Face
- Dark Knight Rises
- Batman and Robin
@extremis: oh I am terribly sorry. You sir are awesome.
- The Dark Knight
- Batman Begins
- Batman 1989
- The Dark Knight Rises
- Batman Returns
Batman begins. The Dark knight comes second after a very close encounter.
I love The Joker and Scarecrow. They are awesome and creepy sometimes and i wish they make a movie where they meet and fight against each ever. I like Two face and Bane aswell
- The Dark Knight
- Batman Begins
- Batman 1989
- The Dark Knight Rises
- Batman Returns
This but I'd switch Returns and Rises around. They're close for me.
Its a tough call. The Burton films are good, but they aren't really about Batman.
I felt this way too up until a few days ago, but after Googling a lot of stuff its turns out that its not so cut and dry.
Some things I didn't realise for instance were that Catwoman's original origin was that she was a normal woman who accidentally smacked her head hard and had a complete personality change as a result, and there's a Penguin story where he straps rockets to penguin's backs (albeit they're duds in this story), Penguin running for mayor is an homage of one of the Adam West episodes.
Batman 89 is actually very, very accurate, but its almost wholly based on Golden Age Batman from the 40s, the only major change they actually made was to merge the Joker origin with Batman's (which the writer later said was done against his will when he was absent), everything else actually follows the first 40 issues quite closely at times.
An argument can be made that
Tim Burton Batman = Golden Age Batman
Batman and Robin = 1960s Batman
Batman Forever = 1970s Batman
Nolan Batman = Contemporary Batman (mainly Jeph Loeb + early Frank Millar)
You know I never made that connection, but you're quite right. The way the characters interact with eachother, the way Batman kills, the enemies he fights..... it's all very similar to the early Batman comics. I've only ever read 2 Batman comics from the 40's, but thinking about it now they weren't dissimilar from the '89 film.
I wonder if that was a decision Tim Burton consciously made. He said he didn't really read that many Batman comics, but he was probably given a bunch of them from DC.
The Dark Knight and Batman Begins
It's unfair.
All movies had different interpretations to the franchise that were good.
Batman '66: It was the prevailing representation of comics at the time, so don't complain! I've always admired how they portrayed the Batman/Robin dynamic
Burton Films: Burton was masterful in his portrayal of Gotham, and Danny Elfman's music is just mesmerizing. Also, I think the Burton Joker and Catwoman were better than the Nolan films. Batmobiles were also the best, as well as the Batsuit.
Schumacher Films: Apart from the beautiful score...nothing really.
Nolan Films: Responsible for the more compelling stories in the Batman movie-verse. Strong supporting characters.
The dark knight is best batman movie but problem is batman literally did nothing in the movie except taking blame at the end.
It's all about Joker, Harvey dent and Gordon.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment