People change, "discover themselves", relationships evolve, etc. etc.
If a character, even a longstanding heterosexual character, is changed to be bisexual or homosexual, it does not necessarily violate continuity. But I would like for the story to be told well enough that the change makes sense.
My favorite character is Cyclops, for example. He has long been depicted as heterosexual. He has been married to women. He has had multiple female sexual partners. The majority of his life, he has been in a relationship of some sort with a woman. If he just walks up to Gambit and says "Hey bud, you're looking pretty fine", I would consider that poor writing. But I would say the same if he did that to Rogue, Psylocke, or Storm. There would be no build-up.
If Emma leaves Cyclops though, and if Cyclops is single for an extended period of time, and if he is shown as lonely and incomplete and doubting himself, probably peppered with some insistance that he's never going to date again because he always hurts every woman he's close to. Then he has a male ally that he opens up to, someone he can talk with, someone he can trust. They grow close, and he finds that he feels better about himself, that the aching in his heart is lessened because of his relationship with this friend. And eventually he discovers, probably during some life or death situation, that his feelings for this man are deep enough that he actually loves them.
If it's written well, I'll go along with it. But if it's strictly for shock value, then as far as I'm concerned, it has no value at all.
Log in to comment