Were the Arkham games realistic?

Pardon?

No, of course not, they're video games about superheroes.

not in the slightest

What now?

nah

Is Batman supposed to be realistic?

@zaied: he means the fighting but Titan and clay face part no.

Fighting? Absolutely.

Rogues? Nope.

Deadshots level

Titans , Clay face , poison ivy , mr. Freeze, need I go on ?

Ha, no.

Batman jumped 100 feet across a room just to punch a thug.

No, and I'm glad they weren't. Batman and his mythos aren't realistic, he's a comic book character. The Arkham games embodied that (while incorporating awesome gameplay). They're amazing as is.

No

Are you mentally handicapped?

There's a level with a giant crocodile man chasing you through the sewers.

Now I don't know where you're from, but that is usually considered to be beyond the norm.

not to mention with steroid dudes with spikes on their backs and ninjas.

To me the comic booky aspects like the crazier villains are the worst parts of Batman's mythos. But tell me again about how much Killer Croc adds to the franchise.

Sorry I meant the fighting tchniques

Who is responsible for voting yes?

no

No.

Fighting techniques? Hmmm a little out of the norm. There are rarely if not any people who can fight like Bruce. Bruce can sometimes take on at least 20 men at a time.

Nah, he could jump across rooms to punch people

He ran around a city for hours on end with poison in his bloodstream, fighting gangs of thugs, backtracking, and all manner of other junk.

Of course not.