Ultron or Superman: Who is more durable?

I'm going to say Supes.

internally superman is more durable but when ultron is in adimantium version his outside is more durable.

How is this even a question?

Superman is more durable than adamantium?

Honestly CV what's happening to you?

IDK man. I wish people read comics.

Ultron

Clearly superman stomps

Superman due to internal durability.

Tin Man

Yes

Non-canon. It also didn't specify which version of adamantium.

Marvel agreed to it, so canon or not it sorta matters. #salty

Still non-canon. Even if it was cannon, Reed didn't specify which version of adamantium. Adamantium does not come in one variant.

@saint_wildcard: lol it doesn't work on what marvel agreed to. Did you know that eddie Brock ranked shots from superman, and then one shotted him. That's what happens in a marvel dc crossover. Also this could be secondary adamantium for all we know.

Ultron easily

So if we deduct the alt votes, Ultron should be up around 80-90%

In addition to this, if you want to think that Marvel "agreed" to it (and is therefore true), then someone like Venom can fight on par with Superman and give him a good beating or two.

Would it be possible for Superman (or someone else w/heat vision/powers) to just heat up Ultron's adamanitum shell and fry his internal wiring?

@mysticmedivh: is it me or was venoms artwork very poor in that crossover. I really hated how he looks skinny and then huge the next section. His lack of jaw is also weird.

Meh, he also tanked shots from the Hulk like nothing and also Spider-Man. He also Beat Thor, I'll take all my positives suckas!

@saint_wildcard: are you saying venom tanked shots from them?

ABC logic is flawed, but whatever. Point remains that Superman can tank an attack that Adamantium can't

Not sure what your point is in saying he tanked hits from Spider-Man.

Tanking hits from Hulk? You're missing half the point. Venom manhandled Superman in that instance. It's one thing to survive an attack. But this is another matter.

An 11 tonner defeating Thor is PIS. But we're getting off-topic.

No. Point remains that:

• The scan you provided is completely non-cannon. Non-canon doesn't count.
• Reed didn't specify which version of adamantium. Significantly weaker incarnations are common and exist.

@saint_wildcard: look you idiot. I'm tired of your shenanigans. Learn the rules to the battle forums. If it says cross overs are non canon and can't be applied in battles because they're not actual feats, then you can't use them. End of story. I'm tired of people saying something's non canon but they still use it as an argument.

Feelings... hurt... ouch. @saren

@saint_wildcard: wow so because I called you an idiot because me and another Binet have told you a feat isn't credible and you refuse to listen and continue to say it's credible you call a mod in. I'm glad you called a mod actually because he will realize how obnoxious you are being.

@mysticmedivh: I think?

@undefined:

Supes

INTERNALLY AND EXTERNALLY

@mysticmedivh: *canon

Sheesh.

36% for Supes? Dafuq

Superman is way durable than Ultron .

@mysticmedivh: It doesn't matter if that scan is non-canon, it's still the only reference point we have between Superman and Adamantium.

Supes has the scans to back it up. Adamantium doesn't. Unless you can provide a scan suggesting Adamantium > Superman?

• No matter how you want to put it, it's still non-canon.
• Reed didn't specify which version of adamantium.

Superman, easily. Only a fool would deny what Marvel has confirmed.

I am disappointed in this community right now