In my opinion, much like the statement "Planet-buster", Speed-blitz is, while a decent statement to make, somewhat dangerous in the sense that it can mean both everything and nothing.
Those who use Speed-Blitz or Planet-bust well tend to apply those things because they recognise that a character is capable of it in a combat situation, that the character, while having to concentrate on keeping themselves alive and keeping their opponent at bay, is capable of transferring that much speed or power with next to no difficulty.
Those who use it poorly tend to make assumptions that don't work terribly well when one thinks about it, such as a character being able to run/fly at a speed which is faster than that of their opponent, or having destroyed a planet, regardless of size or circumstance (this can lead onto some follies of ABC logic, but that's another story altogether). As an example, I can, last time I checked, sprint at a speed close to 20 miles per hour. Let's say I encounter a fellow who can run at about half that. Assuming we are both equally capable fighters if speed wasn't a problem, some would assume I can speed blitz the poor man because I am twice as fast a runner as he is. Of course, this is a terrible example, as I lack the stamina to maintain such a speed and, well, I'm a terrible fighter, so it could still go either way (this is a really bad example, of course).
Now, let's say I take on the Flash. As shown, the Flash is basically able to take a shower, take a moment to choose his costume, eat a delicious meal and then take pictures to post on facebook later before I take my first step. This is a good Speed-blitz because of such a sizable margin.
As mentioned by others before, It works in regards to striking since the closer you get to light speed, the more mass you gain and the more energy it takes to get you at that speed. If you manage to hit light-speed you gain infinite mass, so unless the target has infinite durability, the attack is certain to annihilate the target. A good example would be a bullet, as a bullet doesn't really do much if you poke someone with it, but when fired from a gun, is devastating in its potential.
It does make me wonder, however, whether it would be worth considering calling light-speed the be-all-end-all in regards to high levels of speed-blitzing. After all, if I remember correctly, it is the theory of Relativity, right? While light is clocked at 186,000 MPS, if an object is moving half that, light is still moving 186,000 mps faster than they are.
Would that mean that no-one short of omnipotence is capable of true light speed, but speedsters everywhere are capable of moving faster than 186,000 mps? I dunno, I didn't do too well in physics, and am likely wrong, but it's just a thought.
Log in to comment