@minigunman123: You are soooooo wrong about most women not finding men's "buttocks" sexual. I don't even know where you even got that idea. If you really want to get into it --- it is as much "sexual" as a woman's and yes, even in regards to the reason you are alluding to. That Superman picture is against the rules of the site. It is nudity. Also, why are you quoting people's inappropriate pictures? How the heck is a mod going to delete the post? Unless you intend to edit your post which you haven't and its been hours since.
So its not "my thread. my rules." Its CV's rules. Then again, you are more than welcome to shut down yet another thread you've crear
Go ahead and report the post to the mods then; I won't say anything against it, because I really don't care. If you think the mods would be interested, do it yourself.
"Yet another thread", loltrollisinmythreadagain
Tell me you didn't have a thread of yours shut down previously because you didn't like the direction is was taking and I won't refer to you shutting threads anymore. Pretty simple.
"Yet another" is usually used when someone does it consistently, I did it once because people were trolling and being idiots, and mods didn't argue with that point. I'm pretty sure many people have had their own threads fixed/shut down because of people getting out of hand, before, when all else fails.
That thread was not getting out of hand. A moderator deleted it because you requested it to be, regardless of your reasons fro wanting it to be. You were the creator of the thread and wanted it deleted, and so it was. Mods usually accommodate requests of that nature. It was like a kid taking his ball home but whatever. Someone else picked up and the conversation continued, which was awesome, which someone can do should you do it again.
As for your comprehension of how "yet another" comes across, it was used appropriately. Should you request this thread to be deleted, it will be "yet another."
I've been perusing this thread and couldn't help noticing substantial feminine nudity involving such diverse characters as Starfire, She-Hulk, Lady Death bathing (the starfish image was almost disturbing), Psylocke showing off her assets. I don't mind, of course; it's just that I find it curious how a cartoon man's butt is 'against the rules' but when the subjects are female the poster is not censored. And the 'UNF' comments? Funny how 'pegging' was censored, too. I'm beginning to take this issue personally.
@satyrgod: Maybe you missed that the argument started with a nude female (She-Hulk from behind), the male nudity was brought up later to point out that it wasnt against OP's wishes as the She-Hulk post was.
So in no shape or form has only male nudity been complained about, infact it started out the opposite way around.
I find complaints of nudity odd, considering the nature of these other images I've posted. How is superman's bare ass more objectionable than the claw marks and the obvious implications? More people (presumably heterosexual males) have a problem with homoerotica than overt masochistic overtones? And what is the consensus of the women? Nudity and sexuality are normal and natural, however we choose to express these aspects of ourselves. Why make such as issue over sexual objectification?
I've been perusing this thread and couldn't help noticing substantial feminine nudity involving such diverse characters as Starfire, She-Hulk, Lady Death bathing (the starfish image was almost disturbing), Psylocke showing off her assets. I don't mind, of course; it's just that I find it curious how a cartoon man's butt is 'against the rules' but when the subjects are female the poster is not censored. And the 'UNF' comments? Funny how 'pegging' was censored, too. I'm beginning to take this issue personally.
I don't quite understand what you're upset about. The superman butt pic was actually what I was saying was not against the rules. Did a mod censor it?
@minigunman123: Censored and warned for the second time. I don't understand; the posts that I think more risque are complimented, the ones that I thought harmless and I'm near to being banned. I go back to edit but they're deleted, so I reposted an edited version. I PM the mod to discuss and grieve the situation; I apologize to the offended, but my warnings have not been rescinded. So when I disappear in the near future, you'll know I've been unjustly banned by a small-minded, homophobic internet nazi. At least, until these posts also conveniently disappear.
Log in to comment