Any costume or symbols you're not a fan of?
personally I'm not a fan of the way Captain America and Hawkeye just had an A and H on their foreheads
Superman's New-52 outfit.
This. First of all, who puts armor on the guy who's freaking bulletproof? Second, what second-grader can draw this without his head exploding? The great thing about Superman's old costume was its simple design. And the armor is anything but simple.
Superman's New-52 outfit.
This. First of all, who puts armor on the guy who's freaking bulletproof? Second, what second-grader can draw this without his head exploding? The great thing about Superman's old costume was its simple design. And the armor is anything but simple.
Not to mention the ugly collar.
@amazingwebhead: what second grader can make any drawing not look crappy?
@amazingwebhead: Supes armor isn't for protection though, so that point is completely irrelevant. It's no less stupid the putting tights with outside undies on the guy who is supposed to be bulletproof.
@kittyparker13: Which design are you referring to specifically?
#10 Posted by Avenging-X-Bolt (13149 posts) - 28 minutes, 57 seconds ago - Show Bio
@amazingwebhead: Supes armor isn't for protection though, so that point is completely irrelevant. It's no less stupid the putting tights with outside undies on the guy who is supposed to be bulletproof.
@kittyparker13: Which design are you referring to specifically?
^^THIS!!
underwear outside the tights is so stupid. If the undies come back after the next reboot I'm done.
Never been a fan of the Robin look, although I do love Tim Drake's hooded Robin suit in Arkham City.
Any costume where they put the "underwear on the outside" like the old Batman or Superman outfits. I enjoy Batman's newer look much more.
Never been a fan of Mysterio's "fishbowl" look, for someone so awesome Marvel could design something much cooler.
And, despite the fact that I love his character and history, Green Goblin needs an update. Perhaps will get it with this new, sane, Norman Osborne.
Not to mention the ugly collar.
That too. I know I sound nitpicky for hating the collar, but I still do.
@amazingwebhead: what second grader can make any drawing not look crappy?
Not my point. The point is that the kid should be able to know what the hell he's drawing. How well it comes out is irrelevant.
#10 Posted by Avenging-X-Bolt (13149 posts) - 28 minutes, 57 seconds ago - Show Bio
@amazingwebhead: Supes armor isn't for protection though, so that point is completely irrelevant. It's no less stupid the putting tights with outside undies on the guy who is supposed to be bulletproof.
@kittyparker13: Which design are you referring to specifically?
^^THIS!!
underwear outside the tights is so stupid. If the undies come back after the next reboot I'm done.
Well, honestly I prefer the Kryptonian alien fabric from "Man of Steel", which mostly keeps the simple design of the old look (mostly) but ditches the briefs that nobody will shut up about. Second, we've already got a guy running around with a cape and bat-ears. You shouldn't argue about what looks ridiculous when everyone's already dressed up in painted-on technicolor uniforms.
@amazingwebhead: by that logic, anything complicated shouldn't appear in comics because the design might be too hard for little Johnny to make with crayons.
And bat ears are far less ridiculous than panties. Try again.
@amazingwebhead: by that logic, anything complicated shouldn't appear in comics because the design might be too hard for little Johnny to make with crayons.
And bat ears are far less ridiculous than panties. Try again.
Not everyone. Just the "big good" that every kid looks up to. (or at least they did, but everyone seems to hate him now) My point is that the super-armor is f#$%ing stupid and I shouldn't have to say anymore!
@amazingwebhead: but weren't you complaining about what looked ridiculous first?
F$&k the new 52 suit hating idiots. They make the heroes look cool and appealing. Anything with briefs on the outside is just freakin stupid.
Anyways a suit I have never liked is Spider-mans suit. I just don't, the huge eyes, the black web marks all over it is so dumb. I can't stand watching his movies. Another suit I don't like is quicksilvers and hawkeyes.
@avenging_x_bolt: I was complaining about what looked bad. And I'm saying that forcing realism like "no red shorts" is a redundancy when the guy's already wearing a red cape with little practical use.
F$&k the new 52 suit hating idiots. They make the heroes look cool and appealing. Anything with briefs on the outside is just freakin stupid.
Anyways a suit I have never liked is Spider-mans suit. I just don't, the huge eyes, the black web marks all over it is so dumb. I can't stand watching his movies. Another suit I don't like is quicksilvers and hawkeyes.
Uh huh.
@amazingwebhead: the difference is that the cape makes him look more majestic whereas the panties......not so much.
@xxedward_kenwayxx: that's a little overboard champ. You're entitled your opinion but that doesn't mean you should be that rude to the other viners.
@amazingwebhead: also, when people complain about thing ridiculous to them, it's usually because they think It looks bad and can't think of a reason to justify keeping it.
@avenging_x_bolt: touché. I guess what I'm really saying is, if they really had to update Superman's costume, they probably could've done a better job. Like this concept art from the unmade J.J. Abrams movie:
Updated, but still simple. Classic Superman, but still alien. Still has a collar, but it's not nearly as dumb-looking as the armor's collar.
@night4345: @amazingwebhead: I think the New 52 outfit looks really really good, it helped get me into comics seeing such a cool outfit.
@night4345: @amazingwebhead: I think the New 52 outfit looks really really good, it helped get me into comics seeing such a cool outfit.
It's overly complicated and ruined a perfectly balanced design.
@night4345: @amazingwebhead: I think the New 52 outfit looks really really good, it helped get me into comics seeing such a cool outfit.
It's overly complicated and ruined a perfectly balanced design.
To each his own, I suppose
@night4345: I just said when I first saw it, it looked really good (still does) and it helped get me into comics, it did it's job and serviced the charter/comics better.
@night4345: I just said when I first saw it, it looked really good (still does) and it helped get me into comics, it did it's job and serviced the charter/comics better.
How does collared armor serve the character/story better exactly? Armor doesn't suit Superman at all.
@captainmarvel4ever: Yeah, that outfit really does make Billy the Big Red Cheese.
@night4345: Makes much more sense then something his mother made for him.
It served the comic because it helps sales, and makes other people more willing to buy the comic. Part of comics are aesthetics, and his new costume looks really good (also what's wrong with the collar?).
Superman's New-52 outfit.
This. First of all, who puts armor on the guy who's freaking bulletproof? Second, what second-grader can draw this without his head exploding? The great thing about Superman's old costume was its simple design. And the armor is anything but simple.
I don't see the big deal about wearing armor just because you're bulletproof. It's redundant, but not that bad. Plus, I thought it was a Kryptonian thing, anyway? Kryptonians aren't bulletproof on Krypton.
Yeah, a kid may not be able to draw it his first go, but that just gives him something to practice for.
As for me, I'm personally not a fan of Joker's Daughter wearing Jokers' face. That along with Red Hoods bodysuit, Arsenals' hat, and I've never been a fan of the color of Aquamans' armor. I'm just not a fan.
Superman's New-52 outfit.
This. First of all, who puts armor on the guy who's freaking bulletproof? Second, what second-grader can draw this without his head exploding? The great thing about Superman's old costume was its simple design. And the armor is anything but simple.
I don't see the big deal about wearing armor just because you're bulletproof. It's redundant, but not that bad. Plus, I thought it was a Kryptonian thing, anyway? Kryptonians aren't bulletproof on Krypton.
Yeah, a kid may not be able to draw it his first go, but that just gives him something to practice for.
As for me, I'm personally not a fan of Joker's Daughter wearing Jokers' face. That along with Red Hoods bodysuit, Arsenals' hat, and I've never been a fan of the color of Aquamans' armor. I'm just not a fan.
The ever-underrated Man of Steel made the suit of Kryptonian origin, too. (Specifically, the long-johns they wear under space suits)
But I agree with you on Joker's Daughter. And Roy's hat makes him look homeless.
Superman's New-52 outfit.
This. First of all, who puts armor on the guy who's freaking bulletproof? Second, what second-grader can draw this without his head exploding? The great thing about Superman's old costume was its simple design. And the armor is anything but simple.
I don't see the big deal about wearing armor just because you're bulletproof. It's redundant, but not that bad. Plus, I thought it was a Kryptonian thing, anyway? Kryptonians aren't bulletproof on Krypton.
Yeah, a kid may not be able to draw it his first go, but that just gives him something to practice for.
As for me, I'm personally not a fan of Joker's Daughter wearing Jokers' face. That along with Red Hoods bodysuit, Arsenals' hat, and I've never been a fan of the color of Aquamans' armor. I'm just not a fan.
Honestly I think it makes more sense because Superman fights monsters, flies at incredible speeds, and sometimes has to go through the atmosphere, so he needs a suit that can keep up with all of that. Plus the fact that it's made of a special nano material not only makes it more believable that he can hide it, and also helps when his suit is ripped apart. All in all it's just feels more believable.
I honestly don't like costumes that are too colorful. its like the heroes are trying too hard and it isn't practical. I like when the costume is a result of the powers (human torch) or when everyone looks like a unit (ultimate x men). other than that I would go the luke cage route with a mask
@amazingwebhead: that honestly looks kinda boring to me
@proto3296: it doesn't mean hope in the actual comics. It's his family crest. People named him Superman because I looks like an S to terrans.
@avenging_x_bolt: I thought it meant both in the comics. The House of El crest, also being the symbol for hope.
I really hate the costumes most of the X-men had during that period where they lived in Australia. Especially Rogue's...ugh.
Superman's New-52 outfit.
This. First of all, who puts armor on the guy who's freaking bulletproof? Second, what second-grader can draw this without his head exploding? The great thing about Superman's old costume was its simple design. And the armor is anything but simple.
I don't see the big deal about wearing armor just because you're bulletproof. It's redundant, but not that bad. Plus, I thought it was a Kryptonian thing, anyway? Kryptonians aren't bulletproof on Krypton.
Yeah, a kid may not be able to draw it his first go, but that just gives him something to practice for.
As for me, I'm personally not a fan of Joker's Daughter wearing Jokers' face. That along with Red Hoods bodysuit, Arsenals' hat, and I've never been a fan of the color of Aquamans' armor. I'm just not a fan.
Honestly I think it makes more sense because Superman fights monsters, flies at incredible speeds, and sometimes has to go through the atmosphere, so he needs a suit that can keep up with all of that. Plus the fact that it's made of a special nano material not only makes it more believable that he can hide it, and also helps when his suit is ripped apart. All in all it's just feels more believable.
I think that's what the Man of Steel suit was: basically Kryptonian long underwear, like a nanotech chain mail, which didn't serve any purpose to protect Kal but was able to keep from being obliterated.
@avenging_x_bolt: Thank you for clearing things up!
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment