12 years ago, Sam Raimi released a blockbuster film, Spider-Man (2002) - it was basically a masterpiece around the time of it's release, receiving world wide acclaim: and it was a financial success, staring Tobey Maguire as Peter Parker and Kirsten Dunst as Mary Jane Watson. Two years ago, SM2 (2004) was released - it was much better then the original - followed by 2007's SM3... which wrecked the franchise, but completed the trilogy.
Then - years passed, and SM4 had been cancelled, and an 'Untitled Spider-Man Reboot' had been announced - with Marc Webb directed, and Andrew Garfield cast as Peter Parker. The reboot, titled "The Amazing Spider-Man", had been released in 2012 - had received mixed reviews - and then followed by 2014's TASM2... which wasn't as well received as it's predecessor by critics.
There's both really good Spider-Man adaptions, with their own pros and cons - the old films got stuff over the new ones, and the new ones got stuff over the old one. But likewise, they're both good in their own ways. So in this tournament, we'll be comparing specific segments and aspects of the film - which ever side (be it old or new) receive 10 votes - we'll move onto the next aspect. Have fun, feel free to discuss, and share opinions. First, we'll be comparing... Kirsten Dunst's MJ and Emma Stone's Gwen Stacy - the love interests:
Let the games begin...
Log in to comment