LMAO XD
He pushed the SUN in that scan not the solar system. The solar system followed the sun because of gravity. Nice try though.
LMAO XD
He pushed the SUN in that scan not the solar system. The solar system followed the sun because of gravity. Nice try though.
@tensor: Stop bringing up SS to change the subject, and avoid your terrible signs of biasism here.
You are not debating, becuase there is nothing worth debating about here, and you are not debating; you are desperately trying to lowball, yet Drax's feat is still leagues above Superman's, so again nothing to debate about.
It says a small sun; and if you could read the post above, I posted that our sun is small, so it would be in the same area; and not to mention the smallest star is still so far above his feat, it's not worth debating.
My debate isn't to prove you wrong, because you are wrong; I don't even need to, yet I and other users are to try and get you to realise the stupidity of your post, yet you continue to dig yourself a bigger hole.
You need to read properly:
I said even if it was the size of our Earth; it would still massively dwarf our Earth in weight, by much; that it's not worth even mentioning.
Drax's feat stomps.
@m_man: Think.
If he throw the Sun and by your logic again the Gravity of the sun pull the planets along.What you think really happen.That is just proving the point that happen.The planets are attach by the sun gravity so when he throw it away he throw everything and all. That does not change the weight.I am not on that because you just prove me right what happen.
Back on track now to the current debate.
@pooty: Yes but from what we see in the scan it is small.It is not planet size.That is why I bring up the surfer scan.To show that if it is the size of a planet that was a bad job of doing that.
I did not write the comic or draw how small it was.
I understand that you don't write the comics. But you do know bad writing when you see it. The Surfer scan is bad writing. Surfer is bigger then the planets and stars. You know that makes no sense. So why use that as an example? Also We don't know how small the star is. it's called forced imagery. Certain angles make things look smaller or bigger. You know a star has certain requirements. Even a small star has to be a certain size to be considered a star. If you know that, why argue it?
@m_man: Think.
If he throw the Sun and by your logic again the Gravity of the sun pull the planets along.What you think really happen.That is just proving the point that happen.The planets are attach by the sun gravity so when he throw it away he throw everything and all. That does not change the weight.I am not on that because you just prove me right what happen.
Back on track now to the current debate.
No, you think. He pushed the sun, that's it. The sun was the focal point of gravity. You don't even know the basics of physics or even what you're talking about.
lifting feats do not equal striking feats. if anything, being able to lift and hold something can classify as endurance. for example. spider-man can lift way more than iron fist can but iron fist hits way harder than spider-man. same can be said if you compare mammoth to karate kid
@pooty: I already ready posted that the smallest known star still weighs 100x more than Jupiter, so his argument is pointless; don't feed him anymore.
Superman's feat clearly doesn't compare, no reason to debate, unless he continues to debate a topic he will never win; and wants to further dig a hole.
@kingant27: The surfer feat only show that there is small sun in the marvel universe.
What comic is this scan from.I want to go and read this issue.
@m_man: He can't understand that a star>planet, what makes you think he will understand physics, lol.
Yep he doesn't but I wanted to respond just in case. I tried to keep it simple though I didn't even point out that superman was flying at super speed to increase his own mass significantly so it wasn't really much of a strength feat either.
Superman's feat is so far below Drax's that it doesn't even register. How is this even a discussion?
Oh of course, cause tensor is involved doing his normal thing of low balling every Marvel feat that is more impressive than Superman's. Just ignore him.
@cregan_stark: lol, well put.
To be fair, (I'm assuming the scan above consists of all the regular planet/moons that our solar system has in real life) the Sun accounts for 99.8-99.9% of the mass of our solar system. All the other planets, moons, debris, and particles would be sort of non-factor when in comparison to the Sun, in the larger scheme of things. By pushing the Sun, he would be pushing pretty much the weight of the entire solar system, give or take 0.01% or so.
@kingant27: If drax scan be proving that is the size of a sun like earth.His scan is better hands down.
I am just saying from that image it just does not look that way.
That is why I choose the other way.I said it twice.
I even ask you what comic this is in.
So I can ask my friend if he has it so I can read it to see if there is a different angle to show it like pooty said it might have appear small from the angle.
No shame in that.I just want to see all angles to be sure.
To be fair, (I'm assuming the scan above consists of all the regular planet/moons that our solar system has in real life) the Sun accounts for 99.8-99.9% of the mass of our solar system. All the other planets, moons, debris, and particles would be sort of non-factor when in comparison to the Sun, in the larger scheme of things. By pushing the Sun, he would be pushing pretty much the weight of the entire solar system, give or take 0.01% or so.
To be fair if that System had anything like the mass of a full sized system...it would have wreaked catastrophic damage to our entire Solar System.
@shawnbaby: TY
To be fair, (I'm assuming the scan above consists of all the regular planet/moons that our solar system has in real life) the Sun accounts for 99.8-99.9% of the mass of our solar system. All the other planets, moons, debris, and particles would be sort of non-factor when in comparison to the Sun, in the larger scheme of things. By pushing the Sun, he would be pushing pretty much the weight of the entire solar system, give or take 0.01% or so.
To be fair if that System had anything like the mass of a full sized system...it would have wreaked catastrophic damage to our entire Solar System.
I didn't quite get that. I'm not well informed about the location of where that feat took place. Could you provide some more context? Is it a solar system just like ours? Or is it many, many times greater in mass and size.
@tensor: Lol, are really be serious.
The scan says a small sun, therefore the sun would be considered around the same size probably as our sun; not even our Earth.
I was only using the Earth for your purpose, because even the smallest known sun is 2 times bigger than Jupiter, and 100x times heavier.
Image can be deceiving, however it clearly shows a picture of a sun; with it stating a small sun.
Ask the creater of this thread to give you the issue, I don't know exactly of the top of my head.
If that is true, than Drax busting the star would have destroyed the surrounding planets in effect, but we don't see any orbiting planets being destroyed.
To be fair, (I'm assuming the scan above consists of all the regular planet/moons that our solar system has in real life) the Sun accounts for 99.8-99.9% of the mass of our solar system. All the other planets, moons, debris, and particles would be sort of non-factor when in comparison to the Sun, in the larger scheme of things. By pushing the Sun, he would be pushing pretty much the weight of the entire solar system, give or take 0.01% or so.
To be fair if that System had anything like the mass of a full sized system...it would have wreaked catastrophic damage to our entire Solar System.
@kingant27: I have no problem with that yes I know he said small sun.The image after made it look smaller than what is it.That is why I wanted to read the comic.No worries if you cannot remember the number.Since you read the comic I guess I will take your word and that it was a bad image display of the sun.
So with that Drax feat is better.
To be fair, (I'm assuming the scan above consists of all the regular planet/moons that our solar system has in real life) the Sun accounts for 99.8-99.9% of the mass of our solar system. All the other planets, moons, debris, and particles would be sort of non-factor when in comparison to the Sun, in the larger scheme of things. By pushing the Sun, he would be pushing pretty much the weight of the entire solar system, give or take 0.01% or so.
To be fair if that System had anything like the mass of a full sized system...it would have wreaked catastrophic damage to our entire Solar System.
I didn't quite get that. I'm not well informed about the location of where that feat took place. Could you provide some more context? Is it a solar system just like ours? Or is it many, many times greater in mass and size.
It took place on DC Earth. Other than that I don't know much about the mini-system Supes throws out of the solar system.
What I am saying is that if that mini system had equivalent mass to a full sized system...the effect on both systems would be cataclysmic in nature. In the immortal words of Dr. Egon Spengler "It would be bad"
If that is true, than Drax busting the star would have destroyed the surrounding planets in effect, but we don't see any orbiting planets being destroyed.
To be fair if that System had anything like the mass of a full sized system...it would have wreaked catastrophic damage to our entire Solar System.
We don't see any orbiting planets at all...so your point is invalid.
@shawnbaby: It was a full solar system getting bigger so superman had to throw it out of our solar system before it became full size.
we have gotten so far off topic and the superboy fanboys came in hardcore. i should have expected it but i didnt want to believe that we would go off topic of a question just to prove "My favorite character is superior." i should have known better
regardless this isnt a battle @jedixman@wildvine@god_spawn
Drax's feat is monumentally more impressive, but his power levels have been re-written since then. He isn't close to being that powerful now.
Funny thing is the Guardians have never been rebooted, or retconned. So why they, as a whole, as much weaker these days is a bit of a head scratcher. Bendis being Bendis, I suppose.
If that is true, than Drax busting the star would have destroyed the surrounding planets in effect, but we don't see any orbiting planets being destroyed.
To be fair if that System had anything like the mass of a full sized system...it would have wreaked catastrophic damage to our entire Solar System.
We don't see any orbiting planets at all...so your point is invalid.
True, let me ask you this then...
Are there stars that don't have orbiting planets?
I asked this because stars DO need enough mass for celestials bodies to orbit around them.
If the star that Drax destroyed had no planets orbiting it, then theroetically it was not a massive star.
EDIT: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-there-any-stars-that-do-not-have-a-planetary-system.322140/
To be fair if that System had anything like the mass of a full sized system...it would have wreaked catastrophic damage to our entire Solar System.
idk the sun must have had significant mass seeing as how the planets orbited it and not the Earth but it's a really good point as to why that solar system didn't effect Earth or the rest of the solar system. The sun wasn't amping Superman (stated in a scan just before it) because it was from another universe apparently so it might have characteristics or physics that don't apply to that universe so that might have been why the solar system didn't massacre the solar system it was growing in. How that makes sense idk but it seems to be the case lol.
If that is true, than Drax busting the star would have destroyed the surrounding planets in effect, but we don't see any orbiting planets being destroyed.
To be fair if that System had anything like the mass of a full sized system...it would have wreaked catastrophic damage to our entire Solar System.
We don't see any orbiting planets at all...so your point is invalid.
True, let me ask you this then...
Are there stars that don't have orbiting planets?
I asked this because stars DO need enough mass for celestials bodies to orbit around them.
If the star that Drax destroyed had no planets orbiting it, then theroetically it was not a massive star.
EDIT: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-there-any-stars-that-do-not-have-a-planetary-system.322140/
Except you can see in the very first panel that Drax has just destroyed a planet in that system
To be fair if that System had anything like the mass of a full sized system...it would have wreaked catastrophic damage to our entire Solar System.
idk the sun must have had significant mass seeing as how the planets orbited it and not the Earth but it's a really good point as to why that solar system didn't effect Earth or the rest of the solar system. The sun wasn't amping Superman (stated in a scan just before it) because it was from another universe apparently so it might have characteristics or physics that don't apply to that universe so that might have been why the solar system didn't massacre the solar system it was growing in. How that makes sense idk but it seems to be the case lol.
The simplest answer is that Comic Book Writers are not good at astrophysics.
Even the smallest star is heavy enough to make earth look like a feather. Drax's feat vastly outclasses clark's it's not even a discussion.
Drax's feat is monumentally more impressive, but his power levels have been re-written since then. He isn't close to being that powerful now.
- TAS
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment