Some great comments already in thread, especially deconstructing the concept and word of relatable. See I can't really say which I prefer between the two options, as I can't actually think of any character I don't or can't relate to in a small way and I usually find relatable characters in those because of subjective reasons that tend to be non physical set traits such as gender or skin color or powers. In fact I think its a problem if the reason why people relate to a character are because of those factors, although psychologically there are many reasons why humans traditionally empathized with each other for such superficial reasons.
Usually characters have the potential for both, Batman suffered loss and hardship and as a result isolated himself from the rest of society whilst putting up a facade in Bruce Wayne his public persona. Many people in real life suffer from loss and hardship and isolate themselves and take a more analytical and skeptical view of reality whilst putting on a different persona for friends and family, in this way Batman is relatable, especially traditionally for teenagers and young adults. All that thinking, self reflection, brooding. Though as many often point out in critiquing Batman as a relatable character he is super rich, super handsome, like best fighter ever, super detective, ultra intelligent, and well you can't have a few million of those types of people running around in real life.
Likewise Superman has these godlike powers, but he also tries to do what he considers the right thing a lot, which can be a tricky balance when friends and family depend on you, and he willingly burdens himself with the problems of others but also tries his best to exercise caution because he never wants to actually be a bully or immoral... plus well there is this pretty reporter he likes and he kind wants to know if they like him for being him... and he has all these other relationships and and well there is plenty for a person to relate to there even though if one can't meditate in the sun.
A character like Doomsday is maybe a bit harder to relate to, except a lot of people also experience feelings and thoughts of just wanting to shut off and act through will to overcome obstacles. In this sense Doomsday is more of a wish fulfillment character, this unstoppable engine of destruction that ca never be truly stopped, a force of nature and many have such power fantasies of being unstoppable and invulnerable and never dying, but then its worth mentioning that Doomsday was basically envisioned to be a foil for Superman and not really a character hence not really a relatable character, but even with that intent its human nature to be able to project on a character and that very act of projection allows a character to be made relatable basically no matter the character. A fine line can exist between projection and identification of traits that one can relate to as well. Ororo Munroe is an American black female mutant with supposedly the perfect mix of various ethnic features heh heh - she manipulates various weather aspects, I identify her as an empathic, stubborn, person who isn't afraid to break traditions, i can relate to her, especially when written by Chris Claremont. Unless Superman is being written by Grant Morrison I find him harder to relate to naturally usually. Then I mention those writers alongside the characters because the traits one can identify within them can be hard to pin down and remain consistent. Not only that often the characters are held to be purposefully ambiguous because you can cast a wider net when you allow readers to project into the character.
Log in to comment