#1 Posted by explodingpineapple (837 posts) - - Show Bio

Thanks.

#2 Posted by JetiiMitra (8206 posts) - - Show Bio

No

#3 Posted by PeppeyHare (4310 posts) - - Show Bio

In the New 52? Not even a little

#4 Edited by Battle_Forum_Junkie (7599 posts) - - Show Bio
#5 Posted by RogueShadow (10044 posts) - - Show Bio

Nope. Never have, never will.

#6 Posted by RisingBean (3601 posts) - - Show Bio

I don't know many people who would lose to a 10 year old. Even if said 10 year old is a black belt. So no. Not at all.

#7 Edited by Yokergeist (12355 posts) - - Show Bio

No

#8 Posted by MarlboroMan (1572 posts) - - Show Bio

Dick Grayson does, he even got taller!

#9 Posted by V_Scarlotte_Rose (6144 posts) - - Show Bio

How old are they all?

#10 Posted by sync1 (2870 posts) - - Show Bio
Online
#11 Posted by TDK_1997 (14474 posts) - - Show Bio

In the New 52 no.

#12 Edited by Fallschirmjager (15325 posts) - - Show Bio

at some point you gotta learn to just accept that not everything is logical when it comes to comics

#13 Edited by TheTrueBarryAllen (4474 posts) - - Show Bio

In the New 52 it doesn't make any sense at all.

That timeline got bamboozeled.

#14 Posted by KaijuKingGojira (1400 posts) - - Show Bio

What makes no sense to me is how batman is around 30 and trained Dick Grayson,Jason Todd and Tim Drake at different time periods and isn't like 60 years old.

#15 Edited by PeppeyHare (4310 posts) - - Show Bio

@kaijukinggojira: He only trained them for a a year or two each. Which also completely ruins the relationships in the bat family

#16 Edited by hart7668 (2294 posts) - - Show Bio

*sense

#17 Posted by ULTRAstarkiller (5952 posts) - - Show Bio

@sync1 said:

@marlboroman said:

Dick Grayson does, he even got taller!

He got shorter lol

#18 Posted by ULTRAstarkiller (5952 posts) - - Show Bio

Also no they don't lol. Dick was Robin at 16 lol he was two years away from being a grown man. Everyone else is just dumb. Batman is like 30-33. Yet he went through everything 41 year old Pre-52 Batman did in 5 years lol.

#19 Edited by Hyperlight (5516 posts) - - Show Bio
#20 Edited by InnerVenom123 (29499 posts) - - Show Bio

#21 Posted by kgb725 (6052 posts) - - Show Bio

Only Dick

#22 Posted by PotatoOfDoom (491 posts) - - Show Bio
#23 Posted by Bierschneeman (3865 posts) - - Show Bio

pre 52... god no....new 52....its a little better, but it still makes no sense.

#24 Posted by solon (421 posts) - - Show Bio

No

#25 Posted by ULTRAstarkiller (5952 posts) - - Show Bio
#26 Posted by RustyRoy (11119 posts) - - Show Bio

Truth. This is why this guy is awesome, love him.

#27 Edited by KaijuKingGojira (1400 posts) - - Show Bio

@peppeyhare: That's not what I mean I'm saying that he met them as children and now they are all pretty much adults.

#28 Edited by gor724 (826 posts) - - Show Bio
#29 Posted by frogdog (3240 posts) - - Show Bio

pre 52... god no....new 52....its a little better, but it still makes no sense.

How the hell does the New 52 make more sense than pre-flashpoint?

#30 Edited by Bierschneeman (3865 posts) - - Show Bio

@frogdog said:

@bierschneeman said:

pre 52... god no....new 52....its a little better, but it still makes no sense.

How the hell does the New 52 make more sense than pre-flashpoint?

wait, sorry, I was looking things up for response, and I found the info provided in Annual 2 (which I havent read yet) before this issue, I think New52 made some/more sense...but now that they have made it clear that a five year timeline IS legitmate and not just a misunderstanding....I retract my statement

#31 Edited by joshmightbe (24692 posts) - - Show Bio

It doesn't have to make sense, its comics. These stories take place in a world where a dude can shoot f**king lasers out of his eyes and you're gonna draw the line at the Robin time frame? Really?