I love Batman, including the Nolan movies, and don't like Dredd too much as a character, even though his movie was fun, but I am giving my vote to Dredd.
When it comes to hand to hand, yes, Batman has been better trained, but training does not mean you are automatically a better fighter. That's a fallacy. Batman's two fights against Bane, while entertaining, did not make him impressive or show off any great skill. In fact, he seemed a bit amateurish. He was stiff, and gave off the impression as more of a brawler than trained fighter. His best hand to hand showing was against Ras Al-Ghul, but even there Ras had the upper hand till just before the impending train collapse distracted Ras. Dredd's fighting is far from refined, and lacks finesse, but it is direct, brutal, and effective. Dredd would hit with the intent to break, and maim, not simply incapacitate as Batman would.
Tactically, Bruce in the Nolan movies is not shown to be the expert he is in the comic books. Not to say he isn't tactically savvy, but no more so than the average trained combatant. Perhaps his best moment was in TDK against the SWAT team, but he had Fox's help. Not to mention police and military forces are always reduced to a level of laughable incompetence in most superhero formats. Dredd showed sound tactical awareness of his environment, and what ammunition was best to use based on the situation. His approach is more run-and-gun, but it is not devoid of thought. I'd say they're about equal in this department.
Ranged, Dredd has a significant advantage. Let's face it, guns shoot further than bat-a-rangs can be thrown. Plus Dredd' variety of ammunition types allow him to adjust as Batman closes in, whereas Batman has only really shown his standard bat-a-rangs and his knock-out darts. Batman's best option is his EMP weapon (which we only saw once in three movies, so I don't think it is standard) to knock out street lights and close the distance, but Dredd can still shoot at close range. Dredd is also a very good shot, starting at 50 feet, it's entirely possible that Dredd can hurt Batman with a few good shots. Batman's suit is bullet-resistant, not bullet-proof, so it stands to reason that the rounds will still hurt and not be shrugged off. Hell, when it comes to Bat's suit remember that a dog bit through the old one in TDK and his new suit had a knife get through it.
The big edge for me here is mindset. Both perceive the other as a villain. Which means Dredd, from the word go, will be willing to use, and will use, lethal force. Batman doesn't kill, and holds back because of this. In the real world, seeking to capture an enemy that can and is trying to kill you puts you at greater risk yourself, and that is what will happen here. Also, in the real world, a gun vs fists the gun has an edge every time. I know neither character exists in the real world, but their characters are portrayed as being such. Dredd goes for the execution, and holds nothing back. He is fanatically committed to "justice", and nothing will stop him.
I give this to movie Dredd 8/10 times.
Log in to comment