These scans i've collected and want to know if they're PIS or not? Or the writers are just goofing off.
Are these battle scans legit? Or writer PIS?
I can tell you the last one certainly is.(Not only is it non-canon) Wonder Woman has tanked/reacted/or blocked lightening strikes from the likes of Zeus and the combined might of the Olympian pantheon without being taken out. Not to mention she has consistent enough of a record in combat to react to a mere lightening strike, and deflect it with her bracelets(which also surround her with a protective aura of great power).
I can only comment on the DBZ one. That's a very very well know fake. You post it on any decent DBZ forum, people will recognize it instantly.
The highest stated power levels for DBZ that come from official sources only go up to the end of the Frieza saga, with Goku having a PL of 150 million. V-Jump have also stated Cooler and Broly's power levels, but that is non-canon, as V-Jump is not in any way associated with the production of DBZ, except very loosely by marketing for Episode of Bardock. East Supreme Kai's power level can also logically be assumed to be 120 billion, as he states during the flight to Babidi's spaceship that he is 1000 times stronger than Frieza. Though he could be mistaken, as he has been shown to be a bit of an idiot.
Any other power levels after the Frieza saga are fan made.
@SMDfanboys: The little respect I had for Anime Vice just vanished. http://www.kanzentai.com/bp.php?id=fake http://dragonball.wikia.com/wiki/List_of_Power_Levels
Funny thing, even if that scan wasn't fake, it would be from V-Jump anyways, which would make it about as canon as me randomly picking a number.
All these are down to how well people can debate the issue, if they go against more numerous showings then it's just a case of the writer getting it wrong if there is nothing else to compare them to then they stand. A good example would be Thor he has so many poor performances lately some argue that modern Thor can barely stand up to anyone, a reply for would be that he lost badly to Rulk a reply against would be that Leob wrote that fight and most of the others are against the Phoenix which is borderline unbeatable with raw strength.
I can tell you Superman reacts faster than WW he has carried out mundane tasks while people move slowly, that was just a writer trying to give her something.
The Storm thing is non-canon and was based purely off a vote that took place when she was very popular, no writer will risk giving her a risky but interesting story like they have with Scott for fear of harming her character so her fans base is a fraction of what it was.
Just because you're intangible to physical mass, doesn't mean your intangible to energy or frequency.
Thor's reflexes for his limbs are nowhere near as fast as his hammer's flight speed.
- Flight speed equals FTL
- Limb speed equals to somewhere around Mach 1
She has trouble lifting up the bridge because the force of the planets gravity is pulling it the opposite direction.
- Bridge in in a planet so has weight
- Planet floating in space has no weight. (it is pulled by inertia by the direction of the flight path; not by strength)
None of which are PIS.
@7am_Waking_Up_In_The_Morning said:
She has trouble lifting up the bridge because the force of the planets gravity is pulling it the opposite direction.
- Bridge in in a planet so has weight
- Planet floating in space has no weight. (it is pulled by inertia by the direction of the flight path; not by strength)
None of which are PIS.
I am guessing you completely failed high school science or you are not that far in school yet.
@7am_Waking_Up_In_The_Morning: So why is Wonder Woman STRUGGLING pulling a planet that has no weight.... is it because the Solar Systems Gravity maybe??? So that would still make said Scan BS.
Just because you're intangible to physical mass, doesn't mean your intangible to energy or frequency.
Thor's reflexes for his limbs are nowhere near as fast as his hammer's flight speed.
- Flight speed equals FTL
- Limb speed equals to somewhere around Mach 1
She has trouble lifting up the bridge because the force of the planets gravity is pulling it the opposite direction.
- Bridge in a planet has weight
- Planet floating in space has no weight. (it is pulled by inertia by the direction of the flight path; not by strength)
None of which are PIS.
@7am_Waking_Up_In_The_Morning:
Which means I could lift a Planet in space! :O.....assuming it did not have a gravitational flightpath and i had space-flying-boots!
@CadenceV2 said:
@7am_Waking_Up_In_The_Morning: So why is Wonder Woman STRUGGLING pulling a planet that has no weight.... is it because the Solar Systems Gravity maybe??? So that would still make said Scan BS.
Because you need some kind of durability to pull a celestial mass.
If inertia is pulling one way and you have a drag, the one that takes the punishment is the one in the middle.
She was enduring some pain because she is between the force of speed vs the pull of the mass.
@Sufferthorn said:
@7am_Waking_Up_In_The_Morning:
Which means I could lift a Planet in space! :O.....assuming it did not have a gravitational flightpath and i had space-flying-boots!
If you were not affected by Earth gravity and did a hand stand on the ground, you are pretty much "lifting" Earth.
@7am_Waking_Up_In_The_Morning said:
@Sufferthorn said:
@7am_Waking_Up_In_The_Morning:
Which means I could lift a Planet in space! :O.....assuming it did not have a gravitational flightpath and i had space-flying-boots!
If you were not affected by Earth gravity and did a hand stand on the ground, you are pretty much "lifting" Earth.
Chuck Norris can do that
@agentxx said:
@7am_Waking_Up_In_The_Morning said:
@Sufferthorn said:
@7am_Waking_Up_In_The_Morning:
Which means I could lift a Planet in space! :O.....assuming it did not have a gravitational flightpath and i had space-flying-boots!
If you were not affected by Earth gravity and did a hand stand on the ground, you are pretty much "lifting" Earth.
Chuck Norris can do that
LMAO!!!
@MisterWhisper said:
@7am_Waking_Up_In_The_Morning said:
She has trouble lifting up the bridge because the force of the planets gravity is pulling it the opposite direction.
- Bridge in in a planet so has weight
- Planet floating in space has no weight. (it is pulled by inertia by the direction of the flight path; not by strength)
None of which are PIS.
I am guessing you completely failed high school science or you are not that far in school yet.
No he/she is right. Planets in space have no weight, they do have mass though. They are two totally different things.
LOL@7am_Waking_Up_In_The_Morning said:
@Sufferthorn said:
@7am_Waking_Up_In_The_Morning:
Which means I could lift a Planet in space! :O.....assuming it did not have a gravitational flightpath and i had space-flying-boots!
If you were not affected by Earth gravity and did a hand stand on the ground, you are pretty much "lifting" Earth.
Do you know nothing about physics ? The earth is held by the gravity of the sun, which is a hell of a lot more powerful then the gravity of earth holding the bridge.
@Sovereign91001 said:
@MisterWhisper said:
@7am_Waking_Up_In_The_Morning said:
She has trouble lifting up the bridge because the force of the planets gravity is pulling it the opposite direction.
- Bridge in in a planet so has weight
- Planet floating in space has no weight. (it is pulled by inertia by the direction of the flight path; not by strength)
None of which are PIS.
I am guessing you completely failed high school science or you are not that far in school yet.
No he/she is right. Planets in space have no weight, they do have mass though. They are two totally different things.
LOL how do you make stuff like this up ? Everything in the universe is affected by gravity, even an object in the deepest reaches of space are affected by gravity and have weight, however minute it might be.
@toby5678910 said:
@Sovereign91001 said:
@MisterWhisper said:
@7am_Waking_Up_In_The_Morning said:
She has trouble lifting up the bridge because the force of the planets gravity is pulling it the opposite direction.
- Bridge in in a planet so has weight
- Planet floating in space has no weight. (it is pulled by inertia by the direction of the flight path; not by strength)
None of which are PIS.
I am guessing you completely failed high school science or you are not that far in school yet.
No he/she is right. Planets in space have no weight, they do have mass though. They are two totally different things.
LOL how do you make stuff like this up ? Everything in the universe is affected by gravity, even an object in the deepest reaches of space are affected by gravity and have weight, however minute it might be.
Because Mass and Weight are diffrent from each other. It's not made up, anyone with an education above the seventh grade knows that. Weight is affected by gravity, and since gravity is not a constant and varies from location to location (even on Earth) Weight changes. Mass however does not change and is the sum total of matter within a given object. If you want to call me out at least do a basic fact check first.
@Sovereign91001: I can only speak for myself but I was talking about his useless explanation why they could move the planet.
@Sovereign91001 said:
@toby5678910 said:
@Sovereign91001 said:
@MisterWhisper said:
@7am_Waking_Up_In_The_Morning said:
She has trouble lifting up the bridge because the force of the planets gravity is pulling it the opposite direction.
- Bridge in in a planet so has weight
- Planet floating in space has no weight. (it is pulled by inertia by the direction of the flight path; not by strength)
None of which are PIS.
I am guessing you completely failed high school science or you are not that far in school yet.
No he/she is right. Planets in space have no weight, they do have mass though. They are two totally different things.
LOL how do you make stuff like this up ? Everything in the universe is affected by gravity, even an object in the deepest reaches of space are affected by gravity and have weight, however minute it might be.
Because Mass and Weight are diffrent from each other. It's not made up, anyone with an education above the seventh grade knows that. Weight is affected by gravity, and since gravity is not a constant and varies from location to location (even on Earth) Weight changes. Mass however does not change and is the sum total of matter within a given object. If you want to call me out at least do a basic fact check first.
All bodies in the Universe are affected by some type of gravity, How can you say that planets in space have no weight, especially earth, when the suns gravity is directly affecting it ???
Seems to me your the one who needs a refresher course lawl...
@MisterWhisper said:
@Sovereign91001: I can only speak for myself but I was talking about his useless explanation why they could move the planet.
Like I said. They weren't pulling the planet (with their strength). They were using the force of their flight. There is no leverage to 'pull' in space. Only the direction of their flight is the force that is doing the 'pulling'.
I can draw a simple diagram of how its done.
And you're taking about the Gravitational Constant of the Universe which still doesn't effect flight path and the Gravity of the Sun won't effect it either otherwise the Earth and all other planets in the Solar System would have crashed into the Sun long ago. Think about it for a moment. If you in space holding a 100 pound ball. That ball would not weigh anything. You can simply extend your arm out to it and push it away from you or you away from it. However, as you and the 100 pound ball are floating in the vaccuum of space, you are not suddenly pulled towards the sun at near faster than speed light. You are still at the same location floating there.
At least that's how it seems. (Thanks to the GCOTU)
But you, the ball, the planets and the sun are actually moving at near light speed around the galaxy and the Galaxy moving even faster around the universe.
But the Gravitational Constant doesn't effect where objects with an opposite force moves. Especially objects that move faster than light like the three posted in the scan.
Trust me, If Earth was literally sitting on top of Jupiter (assuming there was solid ground in Jupiter), none of the three would be able to pick up Earth because Earth would have a weight.
@7am_Waking_Up_In_The_Morning: Gravity has very little to do with moving a planetary body like the Earth. It is the mass and the momentum that is the issue.
The earth has a mass of roughly 6x10 to the 24th power kilograms, and travels at a little over 100,000 kmph also combined with its distance from the sun gives it 2.663x10 kgms-1 of angular momentum.
I know we throw some believability out the window in a comic really people...
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment