Are some Heroes portrayed better in media?

A question, do you think Superheroes and Street Heroes are portrayed better in media? Well ok maybe better isn't the right word.....ahh...more...more down to earth so to speak? I mean in comics, you have Superheroes doing a bunch of crazy stuff but in media its like...they do crazy things however its not over the top ya know? The heroes are depowered, however they still are able to do some pretty insane stuff and they aren't so OP that they are given challenges which makes for a nice story. Anyway just wondering, if some thought of this I dunno if I chose the correct words for what I was trying to say but oh well..

Well Vigilante is a no name in the comics but good supporting character in JLU. That's an example of being portrayed better in the media.

It depends on the character. For instance I quite like the film version of Thor but I don't like him in the comics

@Wolfrazer: Huntress with her own show would be good. Closest thing to a female Batman I've seen.

Yes. Wolverine and Rogue are perfect examples.

@guttridgeb: yea I agree with this. Comic book Wolverine is awesome. Movie Wolverine is pretty bad imo.

@Wolfrazer: actually it's kinda sad but it comes down to money. realitive to the medium i can draw insane things much cheaper then i can recreat them in a movie or show even with cgi.

@Wolfrazer said:

@Jnr6Lil: Was actually thinking for a Q: TAS, Huntress would be his partner/love interest, always liked them as a couple would fit. Plus always did wanna see Q working in his city him relying on just what he can get by not no fancy gadgets or anything unlike Batman plus always did wanna see a visal of where Q comes from, which makes Gotham look like a paradise.

Yeah I don't know about that, Gotham is horrible.

@Wolfrazer said:

@Jnr6Lil: Well its whats said*shrugs* but ya know its all about the money, sad thing is there was a Question TAS planned but it was scrapped at the last moment.

Also...

LIKE A BOSS! I am really disappointed, theres no tv series for Q.

Yeah don't think they found Question marketable.

@Wolfrazer said:

@Jnr6Lil: Marketable......./sigh, don't know if they don't try besides it would also expand more on other heroes rather then the same old same old Superman/Batman things and all. Get some good writers, good voice actors, good animation style you can have a good tv show that people will watch I mean tv comes out with news shows all the time and people watch those.

Question is too normal for kids. He's best suited for an older audience, and that wasn't JLU's target audience.

@Wolfrazer said:

@Jnr6Lil: Marketable......./sigh, don't know if they don't try besides it would also expand more on other heroes rather then the same old same old Superman/Batman things and all. Get some good writers, good voice actors, good animation style you can have a good tv show that people will watch I mean tv comes out with news shows all the time and people watch those.

Question is too normal for kids. He's best suited for an older audience, and that wasn't JLU's target audience.

@Wolfrazer said:

@Jnr6Lil said:

@Wolfrazer said:

@Jnr6Lil: Marketable......./sigh, don't know if they don't try besides it would also expand more on other heroes rather then the same old same old Superman/Batman things and all. Get some good writers, good voice actors, good animation style you can have a good tv show that people will watch I mean tv comes out with news shows all the time and people watch those.

Question is too normal for kids. He's best suited for an older audience, and that wasn't JLU's target audience.

I know, but so? JLU was suited for just everyone, which fit nicely it wasn't too kiddie but it also wasn't too adult therefore a large audience could watch and enjoy the show. It had a good mix of everything, Batman: TAS was the same way and Batman is normal.....well sorta(of course by today's standards, I think it would be rated PG rather then Y-7), and yes Question is more normal then Batman but its not like you still can't tell great stories with normal characters. Have already thought up of some nice characters, and a few episodes myself.

JLU was still a kids show though, no matter how mature it was.

@Wolfrazer said:

@Jnr6Lil said:

@Wolfrazer said:

@Jnr6Lil: Marketable......./sigh, don't know if they don't try besides it would also expand more on other heroes rather then the same old same old Superman/Batman things and all. Get some good writers, good voice actors, good animation style you can have a good tv show that people will watch I mean tv comes out with news shows all the time and people watch those.

Question is too normal for kids. He's best suited for an older audience, and that wasn't JLU's target audience.

I know, but so? JLU was suited for just everyone, which fit nicely it wasn't too kiddie but it also wasn't too adult therefore a large audience could watch and enjoy the show. It had a good mix of everything, Batman: TAS was the same way and Batman is normal.....well sorta(of course by today's standards, I think it would be rated PG rather then Y-7), and yes Question is more normal then Batman but its not like you still can't tell great stories with normal characters. Have already thought up of some nice characters, and a few episodes myself.

JLU was still a kids show though, no matter how mature it was.

@Wolfrazer said:

@Jnr6Lil said:

@Wolfrazer said:

@Jnr6Lil said:

@Wolfrazer said:

@Jnr6Lil: Marketable......./sigh, don't know if they don't try besides it would also expand more on other heroes rather then the same old same old Superman/Batman things and all. Get some good writers, good voice actors, good animation style you can have a good tv show that people will watch I mean tv comes out with news shows all the time and people watch those.

Question is too normal for kids. He's best suited for an older audience, and that wasn't JLU's target audience.

I know, but so? JLU was suited for just everyone, which fit nicely it wasn't too kiddie but it also wasn't too adult therefore a large audience could watch and enjoy the show. It had a good mix of everything, Batman: TAS was the same way and Batman is normal.....well sorta(of course by today's standards, I think it would be rated PG rather then Y-7), and yes Question is more normal then Batman but its not like you still can't tell great stories with normal characters. Have already thought up of some nice characters, and a few episodes myself.

JLU was still a kids show though, no matter how mature it was.

At its core yes it was, but its not like others couldn't watch and enjoy it.

Yes but it's rating was still PG.

As always, it depends on the writer.

Nite Owl II looks more impressive in the movieverse.

@Wolfrazer: Yes but everyone can watch TV-Y7. I think PG is still aimed at kids.

@Wolfrazer: Question was just too mature. Little kids wouldn't understand his conspiracy theories.

@Wolfrazer: Huntress would've been good having a solo series.

I like Vigilante, hate country.

@Wolfrazer: Huntress would've been good having a solo series.

I like Vigilante, hate country.

I would say most Marvel big heroes are potrayed better in movies like Captain America Iron man and Thor

Everybody can "get the character", no matter where do they come from in the whole media...

@Wolfrazer: I prefer Oneil's Question.

@Wolfrazer: Renee Montoya

@Wolfrazer: Ah

I;d say no

@NerdsFTW said:

As always, it depends on the writer.

@NerdsFTW said:

@NerdsFTW said:

As always, it depends on the writer.

This guy...