it better not be a The Thing explanation. wonky causality nonsense. Stark should do it on purpose. like literally almost. He should indirectly directly be responsible.
I'm not liking this. At least not initially. If Tony had a hand in what happened to Bruce due to a drunken stupor (what is up with that martini glass?) then it just makes me dislike the character even more. I don't feel I have anything valuable to add to this since I'm not really an Iron Man or Hulk fan but as a fringe Marvel fan, I don't like how they have these heroes dipping into each other's histories to the point of being a part/reason for their situations.
Between what's being suggested over on the Fantastic Four title to now this, I'm not all that enthused. I'm in though. I hope it's not all flash and no substance.
@granitesoldier: I'm hoping too. But knowing Marvel now that Iron Man is the golden boy...I don't have much faith.
He does seem to be many places at once these days doesn't he?
No more so than Batman
Who has nothing to do with anything here.
Batman is over-used. I hope that Tony is not the cause of the hulk, Banner is already moaning that he is playing second fiddle to Tony in the inventing area, so to have Tony invent Hulks too would be a bit dissapointing.
Log in to comment