• 91 results
  • 1
  • 2
#51 Posted by fodigg (6146 posts) - - Show Bio

@weaponmaster said:

Looks like some sort of pedophile fantasy book. Gross.

Yikes. And I wonder why Lobdell gets defensive...

#52 Edited by k4tzm4n (49025 posts) - - Show Bio

Just disregard weaponmaster. He pulled the same nonsense in the Deathstroke preview, claiming work like that gives us less regard for human life.

/eyeroll

Staff Online
#53 Posted by divingfalcon713 (283 posts) - - Show Bio

@weaponmaster: I don't see why you're upset over pedophilia when it's clearly stated that S'aru isn't a little boy. I never said I cannot see Starfires face, I said IMO there are no close ups of her face that emphasize any childlike features. Just because I disagree with you doesn't mean I am attacking you, which your defensive and somewhat rude attitude suggests you think. Thank you for reiterating that I am entitled to my opinion. However, this is a forum, and I can state my opinion whether or not you asked for it, just as you can. "I posted my thoughts. if you don't like them, for whatever reasons, that is not my concern."

#54 Posted by victoriancuckoo (228 posts) - - Show Bio

I love the art, and I love that this is a tight team, I think my biggest problem with a lot of X books is that there are so many characters that it never gives anyone a real focus.

#55 Posted by 218Comics (191 posts) - - Show Bio

Lobdell is proving himself again and again with the New 52. I had looked past this title, only to pick it up by chance a month later. Now, it's one of my favorites and can't wait for this month's to come out.

#56 Posted by jsphsmth (1136 posts) - - Show Bio

@weaponmaster: "SNIKER" So much for intelligent discussion.

#57 Posted by weaponmaster (1412 posts) - - Show Bio

@jsphsmth said:

@weaponmaster: "SNIKER" So much for intelligent discussion.

I believe the correct spelling you are looking for is SNICKER. So much for intelligent conversation indeed.

#58 Posted by k4tzm4n (49025 posts) - - Show Bio

How your trolling manages to elude a ban is simply beyond logic.

Staff Online
#59 Posted by daredevil21134 (12110 posts) - - Show Bio

@k4tzm4n said:

How your trolling manages to elude a ban is simply beyond logic.

lol

#60 Posted by jsphsmth (1136 posts) - - Show Bio

@weaponmaster: Lobdell is bringing Raven back to the Teen Titans! A witch! A dark magic practitioner! Doesn't that bother your (non)sensibilities?

#61 Posted by weaponmaster (1412 posts) - - Show Bio

@jsphsmth said:

@weaponmaster: Lobdell is bringing Raven back to the Teen Titans! A witch! A dark magic practitioner! Doesn't that bother your (non)sensibilities?

Are you still obsessing about a conversation that took place a week ago? Grow up and grow a pair and get over it. You seem like a spoiled little child.

Raven is not a witch by the way she is the daughter of a demon with inherent abilities and control of magical energies.

With that stated I don't have a problem with anyones "religion" per se as long as it does not harm anyone. Stop trolling and acting like a 5 year old and move on with your life.

#62 Posted by k4tzm4n (49025 posts) - - Show Bio

Personal insults aren't the way to go.

Staff Online
#63 Posted by weaponmaster (1412 posts) - - Show Bio

@k4tzm4n said:

How your trolling manages to elude a ban is simply beyond logic.

What you are doing is actually trolling. 2 off topic personal attacks by you. You are a true hypocrite in every sense of the word.

#64 Posted by Erik (33329 posts) - - Show Bio
#65 Posted by weaponmaster (1412 posts) - - Show Bio

I am not a kid. Typos and words spelled incorrectly are two entirely different issues. That is not even from this thread. Obsess much?

#66 Posted by Erik (33329 posts) - - Show Bio

@weaponmaster said:

I am not a kid. Typos and words spelled incorrectly are two entirely different issues. That is not even from this thread. Obsess much?

Actually they are exactly the same thing. Not from this thread but I happened to be in the other thread and I noticed you trolling both. And if we are going to bring obsessive into it, I am not the one posting people's personal information on a forum. ;)

#67 Posted by Jake Fury (18933 posts) - - Show Bio

Anyone know if Starfire has sex in this book? That's going to determine if I buy it or not...

#68 Posted by k4tzm4n (49025 posts) - - Show Bio

@Jake Fury said:

Anyone know if Starfire has sex in this book? That's going to determine if I buy it or not...

I legitimately lol'd.

Staff Online
#69 Posted by Jake Fury (18933 posts) - - Show Bio

LMAO, for those that don't know me as well as katz and others, that was just a joke!

#70 Posted by weaponmaster (1412 posts) - - Show Bio

No. They are not exactly the same thing. Knowing how to spell something and making a mistake without noticing and not knowing how to spell a word and typing it thinking it is correct are much different. if you cannot understand this then you lack the ability to comprehend. You are the one actually trolling and me responding to trolls is not trolling. You obviously do not know the definition of trolling. I am not posting anyones personal information anywhere. Are you delusional?

#71 Posted by Jake Fury (18933 posts) - - Show Bio

In all seriousness, I wouldn't recommend anyone that uses LSD on a daily basis to check this out. The art is pretty trippy.

#72 Posted by Erik (33329 posts) - - Show Bio

@weaponmaster said:

No. They are not exactly the same thing. Knowing how to spell something and making a mistake without noticing and not knowing how to spell a word and typing it thinking it is correct are much different. if you cannot understand this then you lack the ability to comprehend. You are the one actually trolling and me responding to trolls is not trolling. You obviously do not know the definition of trolling. I am not posting anyones personal information anywhere. Are you delusional?

And you are psychic? You know that his post was not just a mistake? Wow, that is one impressive ability. May I ask you for the powerball numbers this week? I must admit, I lack the ability to comprehend your twisted and inverted logic. So you have me there.

I suppose one can try to make the argument that spotlighting hypocrisy of a trolling post is trolling itself. But the only one that would make that argument is the one doing the initial trolling to begin with.

Yes, I am delusional when I saw you mention k4tzm4n's personal information in another thread. Silly me. I suppose I should just quote and link that as well to confirm your lie.

#73 Posted by texasdeathmatch (13171 posts) - - Show Bio

...so how bout them comics, huh?

#74 Posted by Erik (33329 posts) - - Show Bio

@texasdeathmatch said:

...so how bout them comics, huh?

No you!

#75 Posted by Jake Fury (18933 posts) - - Show Bio

I actually think that the Robin costume here is pretty BA.

#76 Posted by Erik (33329 posts) - - Show Bio

@Jake Fury said:

I actually think that the Robin costume here is pretty BA.

I agree.

#77 Posted by texasdeathmatch (13171 posts) - - Show Bio
@Erik said:

@texasdeathmatch said:

...so how bout them comics, huh?

No you!

:D. I miss the days when we didn't post people's personal pictures and leave pseudo death threats.
#78 Edited by daredevil21134 (12110 posts) - - Show Bio

@Erik said:

@weaponmaster said:

No. They are not exactly the same thing. Knowing how to spell something and making a mistake without noticing and not knowing how to spell a word and typing it thinking it is correct are much different. if you cannot understand this then you lack the ability to comprehend. You are the one actually trolling and me responding to trolls is not trolling. You obviously do not know the definition of trolling. I am not posting anyones personal information anywhere. Are you delusional?

And you are psychic? You know that his post was not just a mistake? Wow, that is one impressive ability. May I ask you for the powerball numbers this week? I must admit, I lack the ability to comprehend your twisted and inverted logic. So you have me there.

I suppose one can try to make the argument that spotlighting hypocrisy of a trolling post is trolling itself. But the only one that would make that argument is the one doing the initial trolling to begin with.

Yes, I am delusional when I saw you mention k4tzm4n's personal information in another thread. Silly me. I suppose I should just quote and link that as well to confirm your lie.

That's right, you get him,lol

#79 Posted by Jake Fury (18933 posts) - - Show Bio

After all the early hate, this book is actually pretty entertaining.

#80 Posted by Erik (33329 posts) - - Show Bio

@texasdeathmatch said:

@Erik said:

@texasdeathmatch said:

...so how bout them comics, huh?

No you!

:D. I miss the days when we didn't post people's personal pictures and leave pseudo death threats.

LOL!

#81 Posted by Jake Fury (18933 posts) - - Show Bio

Says the guy with death match in his username...UH-HUH. :)

#82 Posted by weaponmaster (1412 posts) - - Show Bio

I know this may be difficult for someone like you to understand but one does not need to be psychic to understand relatively simple concepts when one has even a modicum of intelligence. My logic is neither twisted nor inverted, you are simply too emotionally compromised to remain objective. Your second paragraph is actually contradictory. Stop attempting to feign some higher level of intellect. That was weeks ago. You seem to be obsessing over my posts quite a bit. Something slipping someones mind because it was trivial is not the same thing as a lie. Consider yourself educated once again. Find someone else to take your issues out on little fella. Good luck to you. /exits boring conversation.

#83 Edited by Erik (33329 posts) - - Show Bio

@weaponmaster said:

I know this may be difficult for someone like you to understand but one does not need to be psychic to understand relatively simple concepts when one has even a modicum of intelligence.

Which you do not have. If you did, you would not be making assumptions about his spelling when you are guilty of exactly the same thing.

My logic is neither twisted nor inverted, you are simply too emotionally compromised to remain objective.

Because you think you have succeeded at trolling me? No sir.

Your second paragraph is actually contradictory.

No it is not.

Stop attempting to feign some higher level of intellect.

Not that it matters but I am not. A person of average intellect has no problem crushing any of your so-called arguments.

That was weeks ago.

Irrelevant.

You seem to be obsessing over my posts quite a bit.

Okay. Care to make a case or are you just going to continue your habit of making baseless claims?

Something slipping someones mind because it was trivial is not the same thing as a lie.

Back peddling statement because he realized he is in checkmate.

Consider yourself educated once again.

Sure.

Find someone else to take your issues out on little fella. Good luck to you. /exits boring conversation.

Translation: Promptly exits conversation where he was absolutely destroyed to go and lick his wounds and troll others.

#84 Posted by Jake Fury (18933 posts) - - Show Bio

Or switch accounts.

#85 Posted by Erik (33329 posts) - - Show Bio

@Jake Fury said:

Or switch accounts.

LMAO!

#86 Posted by k4tzm4n (49025 posts) - - Show Bio

@Jake Fury said:

In all seriousness, I wouldn't recommend anyone that uses LSD on a daily basis to check this out. The art is pretty trippy.

Honestly, this was one of the titles I was really looking forward to (seeing as I'm a Todd fan) and I feel kind of let down. It's not necessarily a bad book, but it's far from being one of the handful I'm looking forward to on a monthly basis now.

Staff Online
#87 Posted by Jake Fury (18933 posts) - - Show Bio

It's at the bottom of my DCnU list too. It's a decent book but not up to par like some of my other favorites.

#88 Posted by Static Shock (47329 posts) - - Show Bio

@Erik: @weaponmaster: You two finished?

#89 Posted by Erik (33329 posts) - - Show Bio

@Static Shock:

I had already moved on. Did not feel as though I overstepped any lines but if I did, I am sorry.

#90 Posted by jsphsmth (1136 posts) - - Show Bio

@Erik: Dude, don't let that insecure little kid get you knocked off the boards. You actually have something intelligent to add to these discussions, unlike him.

#91 Posted by Erik (33329 posts) - - Show Bio

@jsphsmth said:

@Erik: Dude, don't let that insecure little kid get you knocked off the boards. You actually have something intelligent to add to these discussions, unlike him.

I do not think I did anything necessarily wrong. I just think Static was taking preemptive measures to prevent it from spiraling out of control. Though I cannot speak for Static, that is how I took it.