@TheSwordsman said:
You copy and paste the same things all the time. You cannot debate in a civil manner. I can back up my argument but it would be pointless with someone like you.
I have conceded nothing I just choose not to debate the battle with you. Find someone else to try to annoy. Goodbye.
Hmm ok, lets see how that worked out here.
@TheSwordsman said:
Tough fight. I would say Wrath after a great battle. He is faster and more skilled with a sword than anyone Jack has faced.
ok here's your argument, lets see how civil you debate and how well you back it up
@TheSwordsman said:
I typed that he was faster and more skilled with a sword than anyone Jack has ever faced. I never stated that he was faster than Jack or more skilled with a sword than Jack. Try to read more carefully next time.
Hmm, well, that was a little uncalled for, not the most polite statement, but harmless.....and i don't see any back up for the argument ... no proof yet maybe later?
@TheSwordsman said:
No. You misunderstood what you read.
Proving anything to you would be pointless. You will simply keep arguing regardless of any proof.
So, what did I misunderstand? What's pointless about proof, well I guess that's not an option. And what's all this about me? I'll just ignore proof? Based on what? that is entirely uncalled for and quite uncivil, hmm.
@TheSwordsman said:
Nah. I just don't engage in pointless arguments with trolls anymore.
And this is the most uncivil post in this thread, calling me a troll for asking for proof? Golly gee willickers batman. This is quite hypocritical, y'know.
Now lets see where I was uncivil like you say I am.
@Ancient_0f_Days said:
Prove it, he's not more skilled than Jack himself and Jack has fought himself. Jack has also fought the souls of the undead who were the greatest warriors that were devoured by demongo. He's not faster than Jack unless you can prove it which I doubt.
Well, I asked for proof and gave a few examples, I doubted that you could prove me wrong, guess I was right.
@Ancient_0f_Days said:
I read it right, I named one person and a group that Jack faced that were more skilled than Bradly, Mad Jack, and Demongo's hoards. I can't remember anyone off the top of my head that was directly fast other than those ninjas he fought .... but how is Bradly gonna win if he is neither faster or more skilled than Jack? Besides being physically weaker and less durable as well, there is nothing I can think of that Bradly has besides precog which can only go so far, to use against Jack to win, so how you believe Bradly would win has yet to be proven if at all
Here I clarify my earlier statement, and present a few questions that were never answered.
@Ancient_0f_Days said:
Ok, Concession Accepted
Here I rightfully accept your concession. Nothing uncivil about that.
@Ancient_0f_Days said:
@TheSwordsman said:
Nah. I just don't engage in pointless arguments with trolls anymore.
And there you go again accusing random users of trolling, I'm sure a mod talked to you about that in the past or something, anyway, I'll just show you the actual definition of trolling and then try and call me a troll again. because accusing me of trolling falsely is to incite a flame war ... which is trolling.
Also, the fact that you backed out of the debate due to the fact that you can't back up your argument or just give up does mean that you concede.
So, Concession Accepted.
I can't find anything about this that is uncivil or annoying at all, I think you were lying when you said those things, which means that you said them to cause offence instead of speaking truth....which means you were inciting a flame war and posting in an offensive manner towards me, which is trolling. Well sir, ive caught you red handed. but since you backed out of the argument by refusing to continue ...
Concession accepted. Good day sir lol
Log in to comment