@darkazrael999 said:
@wolverine08 said:
I firmly believe Wolverine takes a 7/10 majority here due to him being on par with Bruce skill wise and having superior physicals, but his experience isn't why I would back him in this fight. Experience has never essentially equated to skill in comics. Take Ra's Al Ghul for example. The man is over 600 years old by his own account, but his experience doesn't change the fact that his skill feats pale in comparison to fighting elites like Batman and Wolverine. While it makes logical sense that someone who is more experience will sport superior skill, that has never really been the case in comic books.
That's what I was mentioning in an earlier comment. Feats are taken way too literally here. I tend to believe that the 'Battle Forums' here put Characters in a realistic scenario where Characters are not hindered by things like plot or popularity.
Only reason as to why Ra's "skill feats pale in comparison to fighting elites like Batman and Wolverine" is because the plot demands it so. And when writers need, they show him as someone who practically invented Fencing and owns Tim handily.
I like to include a bit of logic in scenarios like this, even though it's a battle between fictional characters. For me, Logan's experience alone insures his victory over Wayne.
Heh, good explanation and I do see what you mean about experience actually playing a factor here when battles are not hindered by plot or other needs, and are judged with some logic. But you wouldn't back a featless fighter though just because he has more experience than another character who has a plethora of feats would you?
I will post a comment of mine from an other thread.
Some of my main gripes about the Battle Forums
Consider, yourself to be a warrior; one who has lived more countless centuries. Now to reach the status of a warrior, you have to be trained properly, completely just like the Roman Gladiators or Japanese Samurais. Now consider the fact that you've been fighting constantly for those countless centuries. Logic dictates, you'd be an extremely talented and dangerous fighter; much more so than someone who has been fighting for mere decades.
If you were someone like that, I'd consider you one of your Universe's best fighters. Hence, I consider Ares from Marvel to be one of Marvel Earth's best fighters; better than Logan or Cap. Why? Because of the simple fact that he has been doing it for a lot longer than any of them.
But the sad thing here, is that feats are taken way too literally. Also, only Asian Martial-Arts are considered to be legitimate fighting styles and only the people who practice Asian Styles are considered talented fighters here.
Why? Aren't sword fighting, practiced by the Spartans or the Roman army a fighting style and in conjunction, a Martial Art? Aren't German Grappling Art and also Greco-Roman Wrestling considered Martial Arts? Also the same goes for Fencing and other styles?
A Martial Artist is someone who practices and has achieved mastery in any or more fighting disciplines. It doesn't mean that it only has to be Asian. I find that here in the Vine, only Asian Martial Arts are considered to be Martial Arts which is bulls**t.
I've studied Tae Kwon Do under my father so this is by no means an unintelligent judgement.
This is just the tip of the ice-berg.
Log in to comment