Mike Tyson at his prime, those Asians/Russians you see on YouTube, and John Cena.
No real life fighter would stand a chance.
I have no idea why people think they would considering the Batman movies defy our reality - they are completely unrealistic, and a human from our reality is bound by realism.
Any real life fighter gets stomped. Even a weaker and less impressive Nolan version stomps a UFC fighter into bits.
@frozen: What did Bane do in that movie that was unrealistic? He and batman both fought like trash. The only good combination bane did was when he had batman pinned against the pillar at the end. that combo looked like a tyson combo.
@juzacloud: It doesn't matter how they fought - it's what both accomplished, Batman's fighting style was KFM (which took cinematic liberty). Results > aesthetics, Batman got things done and didn't prance about. And by the way - the choreography was slowed down in TDKR, Batman and Bane weren't any slower (the director acknowledged this).
Batman over the course of the trilogy beat 12 men in 21 seconds; beat down Ninja's, fought on par with Ra's Al Ghul, took out a SWAT team and beat down mercenary teams.
But take the 12 men feat, no real life fighter can accomplish that. They most certainly cannot accomplish that with heavy armor which slows them down. This is unrealistic. And essentially Bane beat on Batman both times.
@frozen: What did Bane do in that movie that was unrealistic? He and batman both fought like trash. The only good combination bane did was when he had batman pinned against the pillar at the end. that combo looked like a tyson combo.
Agreed, Tyson is even faster that that, if it was just boxing, bane would have a hard time touching Tyson. @juzacloud take a look at tysons speed and anticipation, tell me that bane can match it.
I still don't think tyson can win this fight, just that he's way faster than bane.
@luckystrike: Bane is much faster than Tyson. As I said, the director didn't make the character slower - he slowed down the camera
Your example is a gross generalization. You are applying a tournament based fighting style to real life, street fighting; Boxing has regulations, 12 three minute rounds with short breaks and a referee to judge - and essentially prime Mike Tyson never beat a great fighter in his prime.
Mike Tyson's record is actually full of people he beat that were not that notable - that's why he pales in comparison to real greats, such as Muhammad Ali.
@frozen: You have NO IDEA what your talking about. SILVA let alone jon Jones would put bane on his ass. Silva has unreal (real life) reflexes, jones is stupidly strong
@frozen: You have NO IDEA what your talking about. SILVA let alone jon Jones would put bane on his ass. Silva has unreal (real life) reflexes, jones is stupidly strong
I have EVERY idea of what I'm talking about, I have Boxed for atleast a decade. UFC fighters don't compare to fictional movie characters unless that character is uber realistic - Bane and Batman are not.
None of the UFC fighters are capable of beating down 12 men in 21 seconds (far, far faster than anything a UFC fighter can produce). None of them are capable of beating down 4 Ninja's. None of them are capable of healing a broken back in a matter of months with no medical resource. Bane beat a man that accomplished this.
@juzacloud: It doesn't matter how they fought - it's what both accomplished, Batman's fighting style was KFM (which took cinematic liberty). Results > aesthetics, Batman got things done and didn't prance about. And by the way - the choreography was slowed down in TDKR, Batman and Bane weren't any slower (the director acknowledged this).
Batman over the course of the trilogy beat 12 men in 21 seconds; beat down Ninja's, fought on par with Ra's Al Ghul, took out a SWAT team and beat down mercenary teams.
But take the 12 men feat, no real life fighter can accomplish that. They most certainly cannot accomplish that with heavy armor which slows them down. This is unrealistic. And essentially Bane beat on Batman both times.
that combo looked like a tyson combo.
No, it didn't.
Joker negates all that by having batman pinned down on top of him in The Dark Knight movie.
@frozen: What makes you think movie feats eqaul up to real life? If Batman even tried all of that fake choreography in real life he would get stuck in the mouth because real life show superior Speed and other physical moves that actually make sense 2 movies
@frozen: What makes you think movie feats eqaul up to real life? If Batman even tried all of that fake choreography in real life he would get stuck in the mouth because real life show superior Speed and other physical moves that actually make sense 2 movies
Man, please tell me you're joking with this?
Batman isn't supposed to be real. That's the point. He can do all that crap in the film.
Hard to say. Anyone who can beat Batman is outside the scope of real life men, but Bruce was weaker in TDKR. Perhaps some of the world's top fighters could take him, but it's arguable.
Hard to say. Anyone who can beat Batman is outside the scope of real life men, but Bruce was weaker in TDKR. Perhaps some of the world's top fighters could take him, but it's arguable.
Muay fighters come to mind. I don't think a grappler would do well. The last thing you want to do is allow him to get a hold of you. He's too strong for arm bars and such. Perhaps a boxer that could keep his distance.
If you we're to count Banes fastest combo in real time, it would be less strikes per second than many of Tysons, In-fact I'd need to slow a video down to accurately count Tysons strikes.
Bane's just more powerful, a better fighter and has better endurance.
@mtuske: Boxers who keep their range are better suited to the rules of the ring - they are more adept to racking up points and keeping distance with a long jab.
@frozen: I don't do people favors or make jokes. If all that slow movement were brought over to real life they would get destroyed how can Batman or bane stop ahead kick that is coming way too fast for them to react too.
Firstly, it's not really the best comparison to make. Mike Tyson, has 12 rounds in the ring and a clear space to land punches. If he were to street fight, he wouldn't need anywhere near as much as you see in Boxing. Fundamental of Boxing for self-defense is that one punch is all it takes.
Secondly, as I said: And by the way - the choreography was slowed down in TDKR, Batman and Bane weren't any slower (the director acknowledged this).
@frozen: Yea I understand the stats behind Bane and his strengths. I don't think they would win, if that's what you were thinking.
I just feel the only ones who stand a chance would need to be trained in many areas of martial arts. Bane will always be stronger and likely faster but someone with enough skill could give him a good fight.
@frozen: I don't do people favors or make jokes. If all that slow movement were brought over to real life they would get destroyed how can Batman or bane stop ahead kick that is coming way too fast for them to react too.
Again, I will make this point again:
the choreography was slowed down in TDKR, Batman and Bane weren't any slower (the director acknowledged this).
This is how fast Batman was from a criminal perspective. The fast cross-cutting camera shots and lack of vision represents how criminals saw Batman; he was very fast.
Which real life fighter can beat 12 men in 21 seconds? None
@frozen: I'm more thinking trying to break that mask or get a lucky KO shot. I'm quite sure a pro boxer punches harder than Bats especially without gloves. The Muay Thai fighters can snap his legs. Bane would be favored in most fights but he's not unbeatable in the real world.
Log in to comment