Batman with 20 years of prep.
Who can still beat him?
Batman with 20 years of prep.
Who can still beat him?
Galactus, LT, Spectre, Myx,
Maybe wonder woman, Superman, green lantern,
In a straight up, standard gear, no prep, morals on, random encounter fight?
-Plenty o' folks
@dccomicsrule2011 said:
Yubel would still crush him.
Lol, you love Yubel eh?
@ThunderGodsWrath said:
@dccomicsrule2011 said:
Yubel would still crush him.
Lol, you love Yubel eh?
lol yeah, Yubel is one of my favorite anime characters.
@dccomicsrule2011 said:
@ThunderGodsWrath said:
@dccomicsrule2011 said:
Yubel would still crush him.
Lol, you love Yubel eh?
lol yeah, Yubel is one of my favorite anime characters.
Cool, lol.
Did any one else realise that in 20 years. Batman will be 20 years older, in which case he won't be able to do the same stuff he did 20 years ago. Prep should be the same though.
Silver Surfer, Ghost Rider and others there are so many even Wolverine will still cut his head off.
Rune King Thor would know batman better than batman knows himself; and would be able to determine what Batman could do in 20 years and over come it.
Superman (if morals are off), Martian Manhunter, The Flash, Silver Surfer, Odin, The Darkness.
A LOT of People....if the prep applied on both side.
If only Batman has prep, then...still alot to go.
The majority of comic characters
Eternity, Wolverine, The Mask, Spawn, Dr. Manhattan, Magneto, and Thor..... I would say Galactus but alot of people I didnt think could beat him have.
@dccomicsrule2011 said:
Yubel would still crush him.
Yera Allon?
@tomlikesfries said:
Lots of people.
Massive stomp.
Virtually anyone above iron man level, I forget the term. Also wolverine and possibly deathstroke if he knew it was coming. And Alfred.
Batman himself...with 21 years of prep!
Okay, I'm just joke-trolling, but honestly this question's a little vague and hard to answer. This is the problem with prep time - one could technically argue - via conjecture - that Batman can beat anyone with twenty years of preparation, but that sort of defeats the purpose of debating about battles, doesn't it?
Log in to comment