thor vs galactus(read)
rune lord thor have just absorbed the energy of all of the asgardian and is using the asgardian destroyer can he beat a well feed galactus.
" No. 10 RKTs wouldn't be able to defeat a hungry Galactus, let alone a well-fed one. "False. Should I post the scan of a hungry galactus getting driven off by a god blast?
And if this is the same destroyer that was built to fight celestials, then this is a stomp in Thor's favor.
Happpened 35+ years ago, Galactus was DRAINED. There is a difference between a DRAINED Galactus and a HUNGRY Galactus.
Odin + all the other skyfathers were beneath the celestials' notice. So I doubt that it would be any different here, as we all know Galactus > celestials, since Galactus ATE the second most powerful celestial in BCA.
" @Lance Uppercut: Happpened 35+ years ago, Galactus was DRAINED. There is a difference between a DRAINED Galactus and a HUNGRY Galactus.Odin + all the other skyfathers were beneath the celestials' notice. So I doubt that it would be any different here, as we all know Galactus > celestials, since Galactus ATE the second most powerful celestial in BCA. "Not really
And RKT was more powerful then any Skyfather, Odin has always had trouble with Surtur. Notice how when RKT came around, Surtur was begging for his life.
BCA? Isn't that the arc where you tried to claim Galactus was eating the omniverse? Not that it really matters. It's been explained to you why BCA is no more applicable for a gauge on his power then the MoD arc would be a gauge for Dooms. Also note that I find intense irony in the fact that you find something that's 35 years old is less applicable then something from 20 years ago. If you want to play the time card, then BCA is outdated and an alternate future. It holds no weight. At least my scan holds in regular 616 continuity.
" Celestials kinda owned Destroyer. RKT could handle a hungry Galactus, Odin while in Asgard apparently was able to make Galactus leave Asgard alone, so I don't see why RKT couldn't do the same. "And they should have. They're incredibly powerful beings.
@Lance Uppercut:
35-20=15. FIFTEEN YEARS. The BCA happened 15 years after the first Galactus-Ego/Tyrant fight.
BCA is canon to Galactus....and the Fantastic Four. It was also 616.
Galactus was going to eat the omniverse, universe by universe. It was stated that even ENTIRE universes wouldn't have been enout to satisfy Galactus' hunger.
So yes the BCA does indeed hold weight here. Galactus has the better feats here, as he has better feats over Spectre or Phoenix.
"@Lance Uppercut:
35-20=15. FIFTEEN YEARS. The BCA happened 15 years after the first Galactus-Ego/Tyrant fight.
BCA is canon to Galactus....and the Fantastic Four. It was also 616.
Galactus was going to eat the omniverse, universe by universe. It was stated that even ENTIRE universes wouldn't have been enout to satisfy Galactus' hunger.
So yes the BCA does indeed hold weight here. Galactus has the better feats here, as he has better feats over Spectre or Phoenix."
It was an alternate future.
You're reaching. He wasn't even eating multiple universes in the arc. Abraxas literally did more damage in the few books he was in than Galactus did in the arc. Do you also have to be reminded that Galactus was onl being put in to the position because he was being severely weakened by a spell Strange cast? It was something Ikorr.
And stop with this "it was cannon to Galactus" nonsense. It's an alternate time line. It may have been based around 616, but it doesn't make it any more cannon than AoA.
Sigh.
FF, Thor, Iron Man travel into future of 616 where Tiamut has manipulated Galactus into eating all reality. Galactus eventually eats Tiamut, but he knows that he cannot stop himself, SO he destroys the future of 616 plus himself so that the omniverse would not be harmed.
Don't believe me? Read them.
" @Lance Uppercut:I did read them. And there's a fatal flaw in your argument. Any threat to the multiverse and beyond is dealt with by the LT. Had galactus actually been a threat, the LT would have pimp slapped tiamut. Had you read the story, you'd know that the Black Celestial only wanted to remake 616. It means that Galactus was no more a threat to the omniverse than you or I are. The second flaw is that Celestials can't be killed. They can only be put to sleep. This was confirmed in the Eternals run in 2008. Once again, if you want to try and pull the time card, then the story is irrelevant. Especially considering that his current history doesn't match up with what happens in the BCA. It's an alternate future. Not canon. Use some logic for once in your life. At this point you're coming off as some sort of Galactus fan boy.
Sigh.
FF, Thor, travel into future of 616 where Tiamut has manipulated Galactus into eating all reality. Galactus eventually eats Tiamut, but he knows that he cannot stop himself, SO he destroys the future of 616 plus himself so that the omniverse would not be harmed. Don't believe me? Read them. "
" @RiseofApocalypse said:" @Lance Uppercut:I did read them. And there's a fatal flaw in your argument. Any threat to the multiverse and beyond is dealt with by the LT. Had galactus actually been a threat, the LT would have pimp slapped tiamut. Had you read the story, you'd know that the Black Celestial only wanted to remake 616. It means that Galactus was no more a threat to the omniverse than you or I are. The second flaw is that Celestials can't be killed. They can only be put to sleep. This was confirmed in the Eternals run in 2008. Once again, if you want to try and pull the time card, then the story is irrelevant. Especially considering that his current history doesn't match up with what happens in the BCA. It's an alternate future. Not canon. Use some logic for once in your life. At this point you're coming off as some sort of Galactus fan boy. "
Sigh.
FF, Thor, travel into future of 616 where Tiamut has manipulated Galactus into eating all reality. Galactus eventually eats Tiamut, but he knows that he cannot stop himself, SO he destroys the future of 616 plus himself so that the omniverse would not be harmed. Don't believe me? Read them. "
*Thunderous Applause*
"Even if thor took took all of the power of all the asgardian gods, it would still be the energy of the Norse gods of Earth...Galactus is cosmic. Close this thread please. "
dude if you don like the thread go away and save you opinion for yourself.
i cant make my mind about this thread.
first rkt is beyond any skyfather with highly reality manipulation and using the asgardian destroyer, but this is well fe galactus.
to me it all comes down to whether galactus can damage the destroyer which is a possibility. but this is the destroyer odin use to fight celestials, i know it gets trashed by celestials, but thats the point. some people say galactus is more powerfull than celestials others say celestials are more powerfull, i relly dont know,what i do know is that a full powered galactus is off course, more powerfull than a celestial, i mean, he is on par with eternity. it all coems down whether or not galactus can damage the detsroyer but even if he did thor is mroe powerfull than odin and have great magical energy, not that galactus cant fight this, i am just saying. i am not going to take sides in thsi battle yet. i only wanted to share what i think.
I did read them. And there's a fatal flaw in your argument. Any threat to the multiverse and beyond is dealt with by the LT. Had galactus actually been a threat, the LT would have pimp slapped tiamut. Had you read the story, you'd know that the Black Celestial only wanted to remake 616. It means that Galactus was no more a threat to the omniverse than you or I are. The second flaw is that Celestials can't be killed. They can only be put to sleep. This was confirmed in the Eternals run in 2008. Once again, if you want to try and pull the time card, then the story is irrelevant. Especially considering that his current history doesn't match up with what happens in the BCA. It's an alternate future. Not canon. Use some logic for once in your life. At this point you're coming off as some sort of Galactus fan boy. "
Infinity Gauntlet, Abraxas, Mad Jim Jaspers, HoM Scarelt Witch, and the Infinity Being. Where was the LT when threats like them arose? All of them beyond multi-versal.
The IG was also multi-versal, but I'm not gonna get into that right now.
And umm..did you miss the part where it was stated that Tiamut would literally become GOD?
Except a celestial can be killed. Their entire race was nullified in the Abraxas saga, they got killed in Marvel: The End and the Infinity Saga.
So we can conclude that BCA was indeed 616, since all you're points were proven to be incorrect.
And answer me this, why would Galactus nullify himself + a universe that he DIDN'T want to destroy in order to SAVE that universe when the UN DIDN'T have it's restarting capability in 1990? Simple logic FTW.
im with that for now too.50/50 split,alot of heavy powers going on here,its a good thread this one,hope this gets a proper conclusion.
" @Lance Uppercut said:
I did read them. And there's a fatal flaw in your argument. Any threat to the multiverse and beyond is dealt with by the LT. Had galactus actually been a threat, the LT would have pimp slapped tiamut. Had you read the story, you'd know that the Black Celestial only wanted to remake 616. It means that Galactus was no more a threat to the omniverse than you or I are. The second flaw is that Celestials can't be killed. They can only be put to sleep. This was confirmed in the Eternals run in 2008. Once again, if you want to try and pull the time card, then the story is irrelevant. Especially considering that his current history doesn't match up with what happens in the BCA. It's an alternate future. Not canon. Use some logic for once in your life. At this point you're coming off as some sort of Galactus fan boy. "
Infinity Gauntlet, Abraxas, Mad Jim Jaspers, HoM Scarelt Witch, and the Infinity Being. Where was the LT when threats like them arose? All of them beyond multi-versal.
The IG was also multi-versal, but I'm not gonna get into that right now.
And umm..did you miss the part where it was stated that Tiamut would literally become GOD?
Except a celestial can be killed. Their entire race was nullified in the Abraxas saga, they got killed in Marvel: The End and the Infinity Saga.
So we can conclude that BCA was indeed 616, since all you're points were proven to be incorrect.
And answer me this, why would Galactus nullify himself + a universe that he DIDN'T want to destroy in order to SAVE that universe when the UN DIDN'T have it's restarting capability in 1990? Simple logic FTW.
"
As for Abraxas, he wasn't beyond Multiversal. It was the combined efforts of Franklin Richards, Galactus, and ultimately Reed Richards that handled the situation. HoM Wanda stopped herself, and obviously isn't as strong as people are claiming her to be. That's why ever after saying no more mutant, you still have nearly 200 of them alive and kicking. As for Jaspers, one could assume that since the Omniversal tribune has taken interest in him, it's not in the jurisdiction of the LT. As for the IG being multiversal, yeah, that's why the LT handled business when Warlock didn't want to give up the gauntlet. That's why he was prepared to do battle and wrest the gauntlet from Warlock by force.
The arc didn't state that Tiamut became God. He became equal with the Fulcrum. Fulcrum=/=TOAA
So, let's look at your examples. Abraxas Saga, where Reed Richards remade the universe without Abraxas in it. No celestials died in the pages of the book. Marvel: The End? Yeah, because Thanos was recieing power from an object created by TOAA. It's the only object that's ever pwned the LT, and you of all fanboys should remember how shocked Galactus was that the HoTU was actually powerful enough to destroy a celestial. Way to go with a sh!tty example on that one. And no, a celestial was never killed in the Infinity Saga. Two were captured by Thanos (along with Galactus =D) but they were never killed. Only subdued. So we can conclude that BCA isn no more canon than it is relevant anymore because you can't even comprehend what's going on in the comics you read at this point.
Because it's an alternate future that doesn't have any holding in actual comics. It wouldn't matter in the first place, and current continuity shows that it's impossible for BCA to be cannon. I've dissected this statement dozens of times, and you keep trying to use it as though each and every time you say it it still holds some sort of validity in debates. The fact that I've destroyed you each and every time you've tried to use this gem should be proof enough that using it hurts all of your arguments. BCA isn't canon. Case closed.
As for Abraxas, he wasn't beyond Multiversal. It was the combined efforts of Franklin Richards, Galactus, and ultimately Reed Richards that handled the situation. HoM Wanda stopped herself, and obviously isn't as strong as people are claiming her to be. That's why ever after saying no more mutant, you still have nearly 200 of them alive and kicking. As for Jaspers, one could assume that since the Omniversal tribune has taken interest in him, it's not in the jurisdiction of the LT. As for the IG being multiversal, yeah, that's why the LT handled business when Warlock didn't want to give up the gauntlet. That's why he was prepared to do battle and wrest the gauntlet from Warlock by force. The arc didn't state that Tiamut became God. He became equal with the Fulcrum. Fulcrum=/=TOAA So, let's look at your examples. Abraxas Saga, where Reed Richards remade the universe without Abraxas in it. No celestials died in the pages of the book. Marvel: The End? Yeah, because Thanos was recieing power from an object created by TOAA. It's the only object that's ever pwned the LT, and you of all fanboys should remember how shocked Galactus was that the HoTU was actually powerful enough to destroy a celestial. Way to go with a sh!tty example on that one. And no, a celestial was never killed in the Infinity Saga. Two were captured by Thanos (along with Galactus =D) but they were never killed. Only subdued. So we can conclude that BCA isn no more canon than it is relevant anymore because you can't even comprehend what's going on in the comics you read at this point. Because it's an alternate future that doesn't have any holding in actual comics. It wouldn't matter in the first place, and current continuity shows that it's impossible for BCA to be cannon. I've dissected this statement dozens of times, and you keep trying to use it as though each and every time you say it it still holds some sort of validity in debates. The fact that I've destroyed you each and every time you've tried to use this gem should be proof enough that using it hurts all of your arguments. BCA isn't canon. Case closed. "
The LT wouldn't have interfered if it weren't for Galactus and Eternity convincing him to, correct? That's what I meant when I said the LT didn't interfere.
Abraxas was destroying universes by just ENTERING them. He killed hundreds of alternate Galcti with ease.
HoM Wanda's wave obilirated the omniverse, and then recreated it. Way to use sh1ty showings.
Except Fulcrum represented Jack Kirby.
In Abraxas saga, celestials WERE nullified, as they are BOUND to the hyperspace which is BOUND to a UNIVERSE. The UN NULLIFIED and RESTARTED the MULTI-VERSE!
You said that celestials can't be destroyed, and I told you otherwise. I don't care if Thanos with THOTI became omnipotent or not, it happened. Protege, Last Planet Standing GALACTUS(=D), and Beyonder have also owned the LT.
You have no solid proof that BCA wasn't canon. It was indeed 15 years into the future of 616.
" @Lance Uppercut said:Galactus and Eternity only convinced him to let it function for a short time. Beyond that, I don't recall them doing much of anything to actually stop Warlock.
As for Abraxas, he wasn't beyond Multiversal. It was the combined efforts of Franklin Richards, Galactus, and ultimately Reed Richards that handled the situation. HoM Wanda stopped herself, and obviously isn't as strong as people are claiming her to be. That's why ever after saying no more mutant, you still have nearly 200 of them alive and kicking. As for Jaspers, one could assume that since the Omniversal tribune has taken interest in him, it's not in the jurisdiction of the LT. As for the IG being multiversal, yeah, that's why the LT handled business when Warlock didn't want to give up the gauntlet. That's why he was prepared to do battle and wrest the gauntlet from Warlock by force. The arc didn't state that Tiamut became God. He became equal with the Fulcrum. Fulcrum=/=TOAA So, let's look at your examples. Abraxas Saga, where Reed Richards remade the universe without Abraxas in it. No celestials died in the pages of the book. Marvel: The End? Yeah, because Thanos was recieing power from an object created by TOAA. It's the only object that's ever pwned the LT, and you of all fanboys should remember how shocked Galactus was that the HoTU was actually powerful enough to destroy a celestial. Way to go with a sh!tty example on that one. And no, a celestial was never killed in the Infinity Saga. Two were captured by Thanos (along with Galactus =D) but they were never killed. Only subdued. So we can conclude that BCA isn no more canon than it is relevant anymore because you can't even comprehend what's going on in the comics you read at this point. Because it's an alternate future that doesn't have any holding in actual comics. It wouldn't matter in the first place, and current continuity shows that it's impossible for BCA to be cannon. I've dissected this statement dozens of times, and you keep trying to use it as though each and every time you say it it still holds some sort of validity in debates. The fact that I've destroyed you each and every time you've tried to use this gem should be proof enough that using it hurts all of your arguments. BCA isn't canon. Case closed. ""
The LT wouldn't have interfered if it weren't for Galactus and Eternity convincing him to, correct? That's what I meant when I said the LT didn't interfere.
Abraxas was destroying universes by just ENTERING them. He killed hundreds of alternate Galcti with ease.
HoM Wanda's wave obilirated the omniverse, and then recreated it. Way to use sh1ty showings.
Except Fulcrum represented Jack Kirby.
In Abraxas saga, celestials WERE nullified, as they are BOUND to the hyperspace which is BOUND to a UNIVERSE. The UN NULLIFIED and RESTARTED the MULTI-VERSE!
You said that celestials can't be destroyed, and I told you otherwise. I don't care if Thanos with THOTI became omnipotent or not, it happened. Protege, Last Planet Standing GALACTUS(=D), and Beyonder have also owned the LT.
You have no solid proof that BCA wasn't canon. It was indeed 15 years into the future of 616.
Yeah, that's why the 616 U was destroy instantly when Abraxas ente- oh wait.
You yourself have admitted that HoM Wanda had little to no control. Even Strange was stating that with the right spells and some prep he could stop her. Like many, you've tried to blow HoM Wanda out of proportion. It's silly.
Now you're pulling things out of your @$$
Once again, no celestials died in the Abraxas saga.
Yeah, with your one example where a being had omnipotence over all. You've really proved that you're the best debater here with that one. [/sarcasm]
Protege never fought the LT. He had a celestial muzzle placed on him by Scathan. And I love how you have to resort to using non-cannon versions of Galactus to try and prove your point. MC2 isn't cannon. Try again. And go back and read my post. I said object, not person. You'll notice that I freely admit that the LT also bowed to Owen Reese, stating that he wasn't strong enough to take on a being like the Beyonder (omniversal power)
Comics that aren't twenty years old clearly exhibit how BCA can't occur in mainstream 616. I love how you try to make an example using the Eternals series and the Fulcrum, but then completely disregard it when it shows how BCA can't occur. It's an AU. Not canon. Get over it.
@Lance Uppercut:
Galactus and Eternity only convinced him to let it function for a short time. Beyond that, I don't recall them doing much of anything to actually stop Warlock.
Before that the LT was convinced to take away the IG's functionality, which he did with help from TOAA.
____
Yeah, that's why the 616 U was destroy instantly when Abraxas ente- oh wait.
Simple logic FTW again. Abraxas previous to his coming to 616 had destroyed a few universes. Why wasn't 616 destroyed? Because the UN was in that universe, and Abraxas NEEDED the UN. Plus the prime universe couldn't have been destroyed or else MU would have went bankrupt.
____
You yourself have admitted that HoM Wanda had little to no control. Even Strange was stating that with the right spells and some prep he could stop her. Like many, you've tried to blow HoM Wanda out of proportion. It's silly.
I showed you on-panel proof of her affecting the omniverse, and re-making Jaspers. You can't deny it. She was only second to the Tribunal in terms of power.
____
Once again, no celestials died in the Abraxas saga.
Simple logic FTW again! Logic says that beings that are dependant on the power source of a universe WILL die when that universe and in turn power source is nullified.
____
Protege never fought the LT. He had a celestial muzzle placed on him by Scathan. And I love how you have to resort to using non-cannon versions of Galactus to try and prove your point. MC2 isn't cannon. Try again. And go back and read my post. I said object, not person. You'll notice that I freely admit that the LT also bowed to Owen Reese, stating that he wasn't strong enough to take on a being like the Beyonder (omniversal power)
He copied the LT's powers, and rendered him helpless.
The LT exists in ALL multi-verse simuntaniously, thus that story was canon to him. Second 616 Galactus > alternative Galacti.
Beyonder was MILLIONS of times more powerful than the omniverse.
____
Comics that aren't twenty years old clearly exhibit how BCA can't occur in mainstream 616. I love how you try to make an example using the Eternals series and the Fulcrum, but then completely disregard it when it shows how BCA can't occur. It's an AU. Not canon. Get over it.
Except it was mentioned in Iron Man, Thor, and FF's bios.
Celestials can be destroyed as well, ie a series that I forgot about...Heroes Reborn.
"@Lance Uppercut:
Galactus and Eternity only convinced him to let it function for a short time. Beyond that, I don't recall them doing much of anything to actually stop Warlock."
Before that the LT was convinced to take away the IG's functionality, which he did with help from TOAA.
____
Yeah, that's why the 616 U was destroy instantly when Abraxas ente- oh wait.
Simple logic FTW again. Abraxas previous to his coming to 616 had destroyed a few universes. Why wasn't 616 destroyed? Because the UN was in that universe, and Abraxas NEEDED the UN. Plus the prime universe couldn't have been destroyed or else MU would have went bankrupt.
____
You yourself have admitted that HoM Wanda had little to no control. Even Strange was stating that with the right spells and some prep he could stop her. Like many, you've tried to blow HoM Wanda out of proportion. It's silly.
I showed you on-panel proof of her affecting the omniverse, and re-making Jaspers. You can't deny it. She was only second to the Tribunal in terms of power.
____
Once again, no celestials died in the Abraxas saga.
Simple logic FTW again! Logic says that beings that are dependant on the power source of a universe WILL die when that universe and in turn power source is nullified.
____
Protege never fought the LT. He had a celestial muzzle placed on him by Scathan. And I love how you have to resort to using non-cannon versions of Galactus to try and prove your point. MC2 isn't cannon. Try again. And go back and read my post. I said object, not person. You'll notice that I freely admit that the LT also bowed to Owen Reese, stating that he wasn't strong enough to take on a being like the Beyonder (omniversal power)
He copied the LT's powers, and rendered him helpless.
The LT exists in ALL multi-verse simuntaniously, thus that story was canon to him. Second 616 Galactus > alternative Galacti.
Beyonder was MILLIONS of times more powerful than the omniverse.
____
Comics that aren't twenty years old clearly exhibit how BCA can't occur in mainstream 616. I love how you try to make an example using the Eternals series and the Fulcrum, but then completely disregard it when it shows how BCA can't occur. It's an AU. Not canon. Get over it.
Except it was mentioned in , Thor, and FF's bios.
Celestials can be destroyed as well, ie a series that I forgot about...Heroes Reborn.
He didn't require TOAA's intervention in the matter whatsoever. Stop making things up.
Abraxas didn't destroy the 616 U when he arrived because he wasn't destroying them the second he entered. Another example of you trying to blow feats out of proportion
For one, no, she wasn't on par with the LT. You've already admitted and agreed that Jaspers had more control, and I proved he could effect the omniverse at will. I've already destroyed you on this issue several times. Unless you want to replace Gamorasbigdaddy as my whipping boy, I suggest you don't make such silly claims
Logic says that you can't prove it so you're reaching to try and bolster your argument. It's getting you nowhere
Yeah, protege copied the powers of the LT That's why he was stopped by a Celestial.
AU's aren't canon period. You keep trying to pull this "it's cannon to him" bull when numerous people have explained why you're an idiot for it.
Once again, an example of you trying to blow characters and abilities out of proportion. You do this frequently.
And it's still just as non-cannon
i dnt think HOM wanda obliterate the omniverse as some people claim, i mean if she had did that, there were no mutants in the ultimate continuity.
anyway.
the real question here is a well feed galactus is as powerfull as a celestials who fought the asgardian destroyer?
i am not taking sides, because i cant amke my mind, need more opinions, more peopel should participate.
Thor amazingly easy. Odin would be a match for Galactus, Thor did manage to harm Galactus back in the day, the Destroyer adds extra power and invulnerability; the real coup de grace is the Rune Magik. He became omniscient, it let him kill his gods. I doubt Galactus could stand up to mystics of that order.
"Thor amazingly easy. Odin would be a match for Galactus, Thor did manage to harm Galactus back in the day, the Destroyer adds extra power and invulnerability; the real coup de grace is the Rune Magik. He became omniscient, it let him kill his gods. I doubt Galactus could stand up to mystics of that order. "
Thor would win but it wouldn't be as easy as u think
@Jlavenger: Why not? The Odinforce alone i say trumps Galactus, Thor under his own power has hurt the guy and Rune Magik i would wager is even greater than the Odin Force. Rune Lord Thor is Galactus on a lot of steroids, with some crack mixed in.
"Thor amazingly easy. Odin would be a match for Galactus, Thor did manage to harm Galactus back in the day, the Destroyer adds extra power and invulnerability; the real coup de grace is the Rune Magik. He became omniscient, it let him kill his gods. I doubt Galactus could stand up to mystics of that order. "
it wont bea that easy, i am fan of thor, but this is a well fed galactus. it wont be a fight for neither of them. but you are right destroyer armor add some extra power. but i think the pwoer cosmic can oppose rune magic. i know the one who sit above in shadow where stronger than odin and all of the asgardian but since they dont have feats we cant compare them to galactus.
"@Jlavenger: Why not? The Odinforce alone i say trumps Galactus, Thor under his own power has hurt the guy and Rune Magik i would wager is even greater than the Odin Force. Rune Lord Thor is Galactus on a lot of steroids, with some crack mixed in. "
he hurt a really weak galactus and he only drew him off.
yes odin can fight a weak galactus, but i well feed i dont know.
Okay a well fed Galactus...what does it do? Can people show some ACTUALL scans. I mean its like saying a well slept Odin. Unless the guy is actually starving starving like say when Beta Ray Bill didn't let him have even a single bite fair enough i see the difference. But Galactus is Galactus.
Someone please show the actual difference. Because on average i would say Odin power feats trump Galactus feats; which makes me favour Thor because he is augmented beyond the Odin Force by both the Destroyer and Rune Magik.
"Okay a well fed Galactus...what does it do? Can people show some ACTUALL scans. I mean its like saying a well slept Odin. Unless the guy is actually starving starving like say when Beta Ray Bill didn't let him have even a single bite fair enough i see the difference. But Galactus is Galactus. Someone please show the actual difference. Because on average i would say Odin power feats trump Galactus feats; which makes me favour Thor because he is augmented beyond the Odin Force by both the Destroyer and Rune Magik. "
full powered gaalctus is on par with eternity.
a starving galactus stalemate with the phoenix.
you can ask hello for some galactus feats he have some nice scans.
for me this battle is a stalemate, too much power for both side, i think the power cosmic can counter rune magic.
stalemate for me if anyone have anotehr point of view to make me change mine with actaul facts is welcome.
Classic Thor was able to harm Big G if I'm not mistaken. Rune King Thor is WAY above classic Thor. I'd actually go with him unless Galactus is at absolute full power.
"Classic Thor was able to harm Big G if I'm not mistaken. Rune King Thor is WAY above classic Thor. I'd actually go with him unless Galactus is at absolute full power. "
classic thor was able to hurt a weakened galactus with a godblast not in a physical combat. i dont think classic thor was capable of goign toe to toe with galactus. yes rkt is well above classic thor.
"
full powered gaalctus is on par with eternity.
a starving galactus stalemate with the phoenix.
you can ask hello for some galactus feats he have some nice scans.
for me this battle is a stalemate, too much power for both side, i think the power cosmic can counter rune magic.stalemate for me if anyone have anotehr point of view to make me change mine with actaul facts is welcome. "
We don't know that, we know Eternity treats him with the utmost respect, but we have never really seen Galactus at peak levels because hes hungry 24 /7, and the Phoenix has taken him down a few times.
Phoenix avatars have the advantage of drawing on tons of power from infinite source while Galactus's is a bit more finite.
@Logic Mark III said:
"Thor amazingly easy. Odin would be a match for Galactus, Thor did manage to harm Galactus back in the day, the Destroyer adds extra power and invulnerability; the real coup de grace is the Rune Magik. He became omniscient, it let him kill his gods. I doubt Galactus could stand up to mystics of that order. "In asgard, Odin can fend him off, not destroy him or really defeat, just deny him his meal. A lot of people can do that, especially the more hungry he is the more jobbers a tad. Assuming he isn't starving and is well fed enough I think he can handle this.
@Lance Uppercut said:
"Unless you want to replace Gamorasbigdaddy as my whipping boy, I suggest you don't make such silly claims"
O_O
Bravo
"@blacktom212 said:"
full powered gaalctus is on par with eternity.
a starving galactus stalemate with the phoenix.
you can ask hello for some galactus feats he have some nice scans.
for me this battle is a stalemate, too much power for both side, i think the power cosmic can counter rune magic.stalemate for me if anyone have anotehr point of view to make me change mine with actaul facts is welcome. "
We don't know that, we know Eternity treats him with the utmost respect, but we have never really seen Galactus at peak levels because hes hungry 24 /7, and the Phoenix has taken him down a few times.
Phoenix avatars have the advantage of drawing on tons of power from infinite source while Galactus's is a bit more finite.
@Logic Mark III said:"Thor amazingly easy. Odin would be a match for Galactus, Thor did manage to harm Galactus back in the day, the Destroyer adds extra power and invulnerability; the real coup de grace is the Rune Magik. He became omniscient, it let him kill his gods. I doubt Galactus could stand up to mystics of that order. "In asgard, Odin can fend him off, not destroy him or really defeat, just deny him his meal. A lot of people can do that, especially the more hungry he is the more jobbers a tad. Assuming he isn't starving and is well fed enough I think he can handle this.
@Lance Uppercut said:"Unless you want to replace Gamorasbigdaddy as my whipping boy, I suggest you don't make such silly claims"
O_O
Bravo
"
i read somewhere, i think it was in his bio galactus is the fusion of the eternity of a previous universe and his only survivor. but you know wiki can be wrong. and i hear from someone else galactus at full power would be on par with eternity. but thanks for clariying things.
Those guys claiming that Thor would win, or Odin would have a prayer against Galactus...pick up a single 1980s + comic with Galactus in.
Thank you.
Never happened. Galactus > Eternity
@blacktom212:
False. Galactus doesn't have an upper limit to his hunger or power.
" Those guys claiming that Thor would win, or Odin would have a prayer against Galactus...pick up a single 1980s + comic with Galactus in. Thank you. "So we should pick up comics from the 1980's, and ignore every time he'd been taken out by less then what RKT can offer since the 90's and even this decade. I find it funny that the only way your arguments succeed is by using horrible comparisons and claiming hax when someone brings up issues from the 70's, then try to play it off as though the 80's are the only time period that is applicable to Galactus. You're a joke.
When was he taken out by a person less than RKT in a fight? Only one that I can think of is Depowered Tyrant, which was pure PIS. I mean Galactus defeats FP Tyrant, but loses to DP?
Yet most of your responses are something along the lines of "well look at what happened in BCA." BCA is no longer relevant. Current books prove it isn't possible." @Lance Uppercut: When was he taken out by a person less than RKT in a fight? Only one that I can think of is Depowered Tyrant, which was pure PIS. I mean Galactus defeats FP Tyrant, but loses to DP? "
He's been damaged by two planets colliding with each other, his armor has been cracked by BRB, he's been damaged by energy blasts from thanos, he was outsmarted by Tyrant (you can call it PIS all you'd want, but the fight never finished. We have no idea what the outcome would have been or what the circumstances of the first fight were). He's been assaulted by the Surfer, couldn't beat Rachel as the Phoenix (the same Rachel Dooms outsmarted and her feats as the Phoenix were never impressive)
I already addressed all of those.
BRB didn't hurt Galactus BTW
Anyways I don't debate Galactus with Galactus haters.
/thread
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment