@Kuzman123 said:
@Buckshot said:
@Kuzman123 said:
Superman and Thor,lets see now.
Strength-this is at least a tie.One of supermans best feats where pulling the earth........ PULLING not picking it up.I can push or pull a one ton car,but there is no way i can lift it(I can bench press only 100 kg).Thors best feats wore lifting the serpent and lets say world engine.
Speed-clear advantage for superman (but this is no clear win for him since its only one advantage)
Durability-TIE
Fighting skill-Thor.Nuff said on that one.
Overall power-Thor (God blast,anti force,energy manipulation........)
In most cases im with thor just because he is more powerful.
Why would having only one advantage not be enough if it allowed Superman to attack hundreds or thousands of times before Thor could do anything? And Thor's fighting skill is pathetic. Nuff said on that one.
Because speed is an advantage for sups and mjolnir is an advantage for thor.If thor thinks more, dosent brawl and uses the hammer as a shield more then an offensive wepon he can most likely beat superman.
That's assuming he has time to do something, which, is Superman's speed is so much greater, he wouldn't. This is my point. Having a great weapon doesn't mean anything if you don't get a chance to use it.
So Thor attempts to lift the serpent on two separate occasions and in one, he can't. Why do people only talk about the time where he succeeded?
Log in to comment