Thor & Iron Man (Movie) Vs. Green Lantern (Movie)
Who would win?
Thor & Iron Man (Movie) Vs. Green Lantern (Movie)
@mavfan626: Yep,Hal has very low durability.And he was very uncreative.but to be fair Thor wasn't as powerful as i expected either,waaay of form the is comic counterpart.
His feats were taking on a slew of Frost Giants
Calling down a Huge Bolt of Lightning that shook the foundation of Jotunheim where the fight took place .
Creating a tornado to destroy the Destroyer
He got knocked around a bit,but nothing major to say he has incredible durability feats.Im thinking Hal could just create shields to block a lot of what Thor can dish out, whether or not he be creative.Hal wasn't as powerful,but that's expected.Usually movie Versions tone power levels down alot for the big screen,or else it would feel ridiculous.
He might be able to beat him
@MarvelJackAss433 said:Ignore him. Hal was very creative, and the movie rocked. And in my opinion is a lot better than Thor, but just a notch below Iron Man 1.@mavfan626: Yep,Hal has very low durability.And he was very uncreative.aawwww thanks for killing some of it
@odinforce said:dark knight is still better lol@MarvelJackAss433 said:Ignore him. Hal was very creative, and the movie rocked. And in my opinion is a lot better than Thor, but just a notch below Iron Man 1.@mavfan626: Yep,Hal has very low durability.And he was very uncreative.aawwww thanks for killing some of it
Havn't seen the Green Lantern film, but Thors feats were pretty damn impressive.... Mjolnir could do some serious damage
@Dark Cloud™ said:yeah nolan and goyer made the best comic book superhero movies of all time, no doubt.@odinforce said:dark knight is still better lol@MarvelJackAss433 said:Ignore him. Hal was very creative, and the movie rocked. And in my opinion is a lot better than Thor, but just a notch below Iron Man 1.@mavfan626: Yep,Hal has very low durability.And he was very uncreative.aawwww thanks for killing some of it
I haven't seen the GL movie yet but he looks very uncreative from the trailers. The best he could come up with was a minigun, sword, and a giant fist. Thor wins by himself without effort.
I haven't seen the GL movie yet but he looks very uncreative from the trailers. The best he could come up with was a minigun, sword, and a giant fist. Thor wins by himself without effort.What do u consider creative? And what does Hal's Creativity have to do with beating or losing to Thor?
@MarvelJackAss433 said:
What about him gettin smaked like 30 feet and into that car?@mavfan626: Yep,Hal has very low durability.And he was very uncreative.
LOL @ the over hype of "Thor"
Thor was kick ass ,no doubt! but honestly what can he do if Hal puts up a shield??
Hal can Block lightning,He can block a hammer throw.Thor would have to try and psychically PWN becuz his energy powers most likely would blocked.
GL might have this in the bag if he could multi-task.He could keep his shield up and pummel Thor around with constructs.
LOL @ the over hype of "Thor" Thor was kick ass ,no doubt! but honestly what can he do if Hal puts up a shield?? Hal can Block lightning,He can block a hammer throw.Thor would have to try and psychically PWN becuz his energy powers most likely would blocked. GL might have this in the bag if he could multi-task.He could keep his shield up and pummel Thor around with constructs.I agree about the over hype.
People keep talking about Thor vs Lantern when it also includes iron man and it wont be a one on one, they'd help each other so it wont be like Iron man down right away if Thor is helping him. My idea is that Thor lifts Lantern in his shield bubble with wind while it Iron man shoots a constant repulsor blast at it and thor shoots lightning to overload the construct and tosses mjolnir at it till the construct breaks. As I have not seen green lantern, how fast is his reaction? because if ironman distracts him with uni-beams and repulsor blasts, thor can just toss mjolnir super fast and hit him.
That's probly because he was without the thing most of the time. But he was creative(putting the hammer on loki while he was down(something I always wanted to see comic him do)). I might even go as far to say that of ALL the live action movies, Thor is the best powerful
Thor would probably win... though Green Lantern Hal has more versatility with the Power Ring than Thor does with his Hammer under these circumstances... it's Hal's durability that is the Major Problem here...exactly
@Dark Cloud™ said:that's not fair because dark knight was the best of them all@odinforce said:dark knight is still better lol@MarvelJackAss433 said:Ignore him. Hal was very creative, and the movie rocked. And in my opinion is a lot better than Thor, but just a notch below Iron Man 1.@mavfan626: Yep,Hal has very low durability.And he was very uncreative.aawwww thanks for killing some of it
Thor solos. GL was not very impressive at all. The movie was terrible, and it didn't really display Hal's power.
Adding Iron Man is overkill.
@Tony_Shark said:
Thor solos. GL was not very impressive at all. The movie was terrible, and it didn't really display Hal's power.
Adding Iron Man is overkill.
Actually Iron Man is useless in this fight, except maybe as a distraction. Thor never displayed the powerful to break Hal's constructs, the ones that held back Parallax.
Hal stomps.
Iron Man gets ripped apart but then GL loses to Thor. Hal was able to beat Parallax sure but Parallax never really challenged his constructs. Kilowog broke them effortlessly. Between his solo movie and the Avengers, Thor most likely has the strength to break them. If GL had gotten a sequel I'm sure he would have been much more formidable.
WTF could Iron Man do?
And Nolan's Batman SUCKED!!!!
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment