#1 Posted by mavfan626 (4118 posts) - - Show Bio

Thor & Iron Man (Movie)  Vs. Green Lantern (Movie)
 

 
 
Who would win?

#2 Posted by MarvelJackAss433 (12238 posts) - - Show Bio

Thor solos

#3 Posted by mavfan626 (4118 posts) - - Show Bio
@MarvelJackAss433: Have you seen the Lantern movie?
#4 Posted by MarvelJackAss433 (12238 posts) - - Show Bio
@mavfan626: Yep,Hal has very low durability.And he was very uncreative.
#5 Posted by odinforce (1505 posts) - - Show Bio
@MarvelJackAss433 said:
@mavfan626: Yep,Hal has very low durability.And he was very uncreative.
aawwww thanks for killing some of it
#6 Posted by mavfan626 (4118 posts) - - Show Bio

LOL

#7 Posted by MarvelJackAss433 (12238 posts) - - Show Bio
@odinforce: A man has to debate.I didn't reveal anything important.
#8 Posted by odinforce (1505 posts) - - Show Bio
@MarvelJackAss433: yeah but i was excited to see how powerful they would make him
#9 Posted by Aqua11500 (2647 posts) - - Show Bio
@MarvelJackAss433 said:
@mavfan626: Yep,Hal has very low durability.And he was very uncreative.
but to be fair Thor wasn't as powerful as i expected either,waaay of form the is comic counterpart. 
 
 
His feats were taking on a slew of Frost Giants 
Calling down a Huge Bolt of Lightning that shook the foundation of    Jotunheim   where the fight took  place .
Creating a tornado to destroy the Destroyer 
 
He got knocked around a bit,but nothing major to say he has incredible durability feats.Im thinking Hal could just create shields to block a lot of what Thor can dish out, whether or not he be creative.Hal wasn't as powerful,but that's expected.Usually movie Versions tone power levels down alot for the big screen,or else it would feel ridiculous. 
 
He might be able to beat him
#10 Posted by Dark Cloud™ (2174 posts) - - Show Bio
@odinforce said:
@MarvelJackAss433 said:
@mavfan626: Yep,Hal has very low durability.And he was very uncreative.
aawwww thanks for killing some of it
Ignore him. Hal was very creative, and the movie rocked. And in my opinion is a lot better than Thor, but just a notch below Iron Man 1.
#11 Posted by venomoushatred1001 (12334 posts) - - Show Bio
@MarvelJackAss433 said:
Thor solos
#12 Posted by odinforce (1505 posts) - - Show Bio
@Dark Cloud™ said:
@odinforce said:
@MarvelJackAss433 said:
@mavfan626: Yep,Hal has very low durability.And he was very uncreative.
aawwww thanks for killing some of it
Ignore him. Hal was very creative, and the movie rocked. And in my opinion is a lot better than Thor, but just a notch below Iron Man 1.
dark knight is still better lol
#13 Posted by Chaos Burn (1772 posts) - - Show Bio

Havn't seen the Green Lantern film, but Thors feats were pretty damn impressive.... Mjolnir could do some serious damage

#14 Posted by King Saturn (223716 posts) - - Show Bio
Thor would probably win... though Green Lantern Hal has more versatility with the Power Ring than Thor does with his Hammer under these circumstances... it's Hal's durability that is the Major Problem here... 
#15 Posted by lantian1 (149 posts) - - Show Bio

Probable Hal what Thor does with the Destroyer wouldn't effect Hal

#16 Posted by Bruce27 (494 posts) - - Show Bio
@odinforce
 
You got that right, TDK is the best!!
#17 Posted by andre54 (337 posts) - - Show Bio
@odinforce said:
@Dark Cloud™ said:
@odinforce said:
@MarvelJackAss433 said:
@mavfan626: Yep,Hal has very low durability.And he was very uncreative.
aawwww thanks for killing some of it
Ignore him. Hal was very creative, and the movie rocked. And in my opinion is a lot better than Thor, but just a notch below Iron Man 1.
dark knight is still better lol
yeah nolan and goyer made the best comic book superhero movies of all time, no doubt.
#18 Posted by SpidermanWins (3975 posts) - - Show Bio

I haven't seen the GL movie yet but he looks very uncreative from the trailers. The best he could come up with was a minigun, sword, and a giant fist. Thor wins by himself without effort.

#19 Edited by cascadeking09 (6752 posts) - - Show Bio
@SpidermanWins said:
I haven't seen the GL movie yet but he looks very uncreative from the trailers. The best he could come up with was a minigun, sword, and a giant fist. Thor wins by himself without effort.
What do u consider creative? And what does Hal's Creativity have to do with beating or losing to Thor?
@MarvelJackAss433 said:

@mavfan626: Yep,Hal has very low durability.And he was very uncreative.

What about him gettin smaked like 30 feet and into that car?
#20 Edited by MarvelJackAss433 (12238 posts) - - Show Bio

GL was getting beat down by street thugs >.<

#21 Posted by spiderbuck (2414 posts) - - Show Bio
@MarvelJackAss433 said:
Thor solos
#22 Posted by lantian1 (149 posts) - - Show Bio

He wasn't using the ring then and when he did you notice how they were nothing to him.

#23 Posted by The Stegman (22706 posts) - - Show Bio

GL beats iron man easily but then gets beat by Thor

#24 Posted by Nefarious (18314 posts) - - Show Bio

I'm going with Thor.

#25 Posted by Aqua11500 (2647 posts) - - Show Bio

LOL @ the over hype of "Thor"  
 
Thor was kick ass ,no doubt! but honestly what can he do if Hal puts up a shield?? 
 
Hal can Block lightning,He can block a hammer throw.Thor would have to try and psychically PWN becuz his energy powers most likely would blocked.
 
GL might have this in the bag if he could multi-task.He could keep his shield up and pummel Thor around with constructs.

#26 Posted by buttersdaman000 (9286 posts) - - Show Bio

Ironman Solos

#27 Posted by AsgardianXeno929 (835 posts) - - Show Bio
@Aqua11500 said:
LOL @ the over hype of "Thor"   Thor was kick ass ,no doubt! but honestly what can he do if Hal puts up a shield??  Hal can Block lightning,He can block a hammer throw.Thor would have to try and psychically PWN becuz his energy powers most likely would blocked. GL might have this in the bag if he could multi-task.He could keep his shield up and pummel Thor around with constructs.
I agree  about the over hype.

People keep talking about Thor vs Lantern when it also includes iron man and it wont be a one on one, they'd help each other so it wont be like Iron man down right away if Thor is helping him. My idea is that Thor lifts Lantern in his shield bubble with wind while it Iron man shoots a constant repulsor blast at it and thor shoots lightning to overload the construct and tosses mjolnir at it till the construct breaks. As I have not seen green lantern, how fast is his reaction? because if ironman distracts him with uni-beams and repulsor blasts, thor can just toss mjolnir super fast and hit him.
#28 Posted by Westlife (1798 posts) - - Show Bio
@Aqua11500
That's probly because he was without the thing most of the time. But he was creative(putting the hammer on loki while he was down(something I always wanted to see comic him do)). I might even go as far to say that of ALL the live action movies, Thor is the best powerful
#29 Posted by MutenRoshi (851 posts) - - Show Bio
@King Saturn said:
Thor would probably win... though Green Lantern Hal has more versatility with the Power Ring than Thor does with his Hammer under these circumstances... it's Hal's durability that is the Major Problem here... 
exactly 
 
#30 Posted by cortadew (288 posts) - - Show Bio
@odinforce said:
@Dark Cloud™ said:
@odinforce said:
@MarvelJackAss433 said:
@mavfan626: Yep,Hal has very low durability.And he was very uncreative.
aawwww thanks for killing some of it
Ignore him. Hal was very creative, and the movie rocked. And in my opinion is a lot better than Thor, but just a notch below Iron Man 1.
dark knight is still better lol
that's not fair because dark knight was the best of them all
#31 Posted by Tony_Shark (453 posts) - - Show Bio

Thor solos. GL was not very impressive at all. The movie was terrible, and it didn't really display Hal's power.

Adding Iron Man is overkill.

#32 Posted by Xanni15 (6758 posts) - - Show Bio

@Tony_Shark said:

Thor solos. GL was not very impressive at all. The movie was terrible, and it didn't really display Hal's power.

Adding Iron Man is overkill.

Actually Iron Man is useless in this fight, except maybe as a distraction. Thor never displayed the powerful to break Hal's constructs, the ones that held back Parallax.

Hal stomps.

#33 Posted by SoA (4670 posts) - - Show Bio

@MarvelJackAss433 said:

Thor solos
#34 Posted by Batman1234 (55 posts) - - Show Bio

Thor and Ironman would both trash Green Lantern.

#35 Posted by jeanroygrant (20191 posts) - - Show Bio

@MarvelJackAss433 said:

Thor solos
#36 Posted by Lone_Wolf_and_Cub (4778 posts) - - Show Bio

Team stomps. Thor solos just like he would in the comics.

#37 Edited by Pokeysteve (7900 posts) - - Show Bio

Iron Man gets ripped apart but then GL loses to Thor. Hal was able to beat Parallax sure but Parallax never really challenged his constructs. Kilowog broke them effortlessly. Between his solo movie and the Avengers, Thor most likely has the strength to break them. If GL had gotten a sequel I'm sure he would have been much more formidable.

WTF could Iron Man do?

And Nolan's Batman SUCKED!!!!

#38 Posted by Cybrilious4 (1766 posts) - - Show Bio

Thor throws Moljnir, the End(;

#39 Posted by logy5000 (5631 posts) - - Show Bio

Team 1.