The whole "[insert character] is fast and wouldn't even get hit" isn't a valid argument. For one, Superman has never shown the ability to sustain that in a fight for very long. Two, for the sake of easy and more dramatic reading, the writers and artists are portraying the fights in a way we can observe them. For all we know, he is going at his fastest relative to the opponent, but the action is slowed down for our viewing. Sort of how they didn't have Neo always fight at whatever speed he was capable of in the Matrix films, because it would be silly to watch a blur for two hours.
Superman has been hit and hurt by beings far less powerful than BRB or Thor. Sure, BRB (sort of) won the fight with Thor for the sake of the story, but I wouldn't pick him to win that contest over 50% of the time. That said, he would present an incredible challenge to Superman. Just because the writers at DC are lame and continually come up with new feats to make Superman 1-up every other character in existence doesn't make it sensible. There's also no such thing as canon in the world of comics. Power levels fluctuate all the time, and are rarely consistent. Also, more of the medium has moved to short series/graphic novels, animation, and live action. Those now count, because writers from DC and Marvel work on those as much as the comics anymore.
Muhammad Ali was far faster, more agile, and had better reflexes than any heavyweight before or since. BY FAR. Yet he was routinely hit, hurt, and even beaten by much slower foes. Why? Because you can always time someone who has greater speed. A guy like BRB (even though I hate his character - I mean, a yellow horse with Thor's power???) isn't going to be taken out quickly, and in a battle-to-the-death would begin to gauge and time what Superman is up to. His hammer gives him an edge in both defense and offense. A well placed lightning strike could not only disrupt Superman's movement, but even effect him for the remainder of the battle. It doesn't matter how strong Superman is, because lifting or altering the course of the weapon has nothing to do (unless writing finds it convenient to alter that) with strength. If that were the case, Hulk would definitely have had an easier time (than Superman even).
Ultimately I'd pick Superman, but not because of something as glib as speed or strength. Mainly just because his writing is among the worst of the popular heroes, and they see fit to always have him be one better if anyone dares to rival him.
Log in to comment