@ShootingNova said:
@TERMINATORXX: Your assumption is not rules. Follow them. When has it been necessary to say "No prep"? It's rarely even noticed/said anyways. The OP would specify if there's prep, if not, there's no prep.
And I'm done with you. Your pestering and refusing to see reason is now beyond my ability to reason with.
Yeah yeah you said you were done with me three times already, because the op just asks " who wins" then its an all out brad!
@Jayfournines said:
@TERMINATORXX said:
@ShootingNova said:
@TERMINATORXX: I'm going to let this go.
One last time:
If no prep is stipulated, there is no prep, as of the rules.
If you're going to look at one side (prep), then look at the flip side also: without prep.
I'm done.
Wrong
if the op doesnt say " No Prep " then im assuming they can use all weapons they want in other words its an all out braw.....the op never said no weapons or powers and it never said it was a slug fest.
So...by that logic Superman sundips and blows the world from afar since it doesn't say no bloodlusted either? I understand you like Batman, but it's not a popularity contest, we're just debating who wins in a one on one fight without prep our sundipping...it;'s a silly fight because without prep Batman cannot beat Superman. With prep? yes, Batman wins in most scenarios.
Agreed, Now someones making since.
Yes without prep Batman doesnt stand a chance no different than any of us, but if Batman has prep and knows kryptonites supermans weakness than batman has more of a chance.
Log in to comment