@kingkronos said:
@greenteaforme: And you forgot all about the sentence I posted above: To the Greeks a god was omnipotent, omnipresent, and omniscient.
All gods were nearly omnipotent and omniscient. It was stated by Hesoid himself: "Prometheus was a lowly challenger to Zeus' omniscience and omnipotence".
Which poem and line is this statement from? Which translation?
And who said anything about Zeus being omnipotent before. He became omnipotent when he defeated his father Kronos.
If that were the case, he could not have been threatened at all by Typhoeus. And while Zeus obviously didn't come fully into his own until his father was fully deposed, I am doubtful there is much real evidence of him being considered to have gained true omnipotence at that point. He was stated by Homer to be stronger than all the other Olympians combined, but that does not mean he was omnipotent as the term is generally used today.
And maybe I can agree with you there, that not all gods were completely omnipotent. But I have to say that the titans are all omnipotent. They did whatever they pleased, and presided over everything, each titan had control over the sky and earth, which where their parents btw. But the full control over everything was in Kronos' hands. Don't you agree?
You seem to throw around the term "omnipotent" quite casually without really understanding what it means. An omnipotent being cannot be threatened, harmed, or defeated. Obviously Kronos was not omnipotent, or he never would have been deposed. The same holds for Ouranos. If any of the other titans were omnipotent, it would mean they were infinitely more powerful than either Ouranos or Kronos, which seems patently false.
Also:
Very few of them were omnipotent like Kronos, Zeus, Gaia, Ouranos. But they weren't omnipotent all at the same time.
How can Gaia and Ouranos be omnipotent if every Titan has full control of the sky and the earth? How do omnipotent beings lose their omnipotence? Especially to non-omnipotent beings?
I for one am doubtful Zeus measures up to the Hindu triad. Indra, the King of the Gods and god of lightning, is very much the Hindu counterpart of Zeus, but he was practically a germ compared to Brahma, Shiva, and Vishnu.
@kingkronos said:
@rpgr: Yeah keep talking about something you don't know about. The ROMAN gods were named after planets not greeks. And even though, that makes them planetary level?? You're an idiot. I sorry to say this, but you are, you are taking that literally, eh?
Um, you're taking Hera's creation of the "Milky Way" literally. You take Typhoeus reaching to the constellations literally. You take pretty much aspect of the Greek myths literally to the most exaggerated degree you possibly can. The logic is flawed anyway. Hera did not create the actual milky way, she created the mythological milky way, which was based on what the ancients believed it to be, not what we believe it to be nowadays. The constellations in Greek mythology are mythological constellations based on what the ancients believed them to be, not real-life constellations. The world presented in Greek mythology is not the real world, it is a mythological world that's only based on the real world, but heavily modified by what the ancients only believed to be true (or simply found entertaining).
@VercingetorixTheGreat: Azathoth isn't actually a pagan god, it's from H.P. Lovecraft.
Log in to comment