But do I have a right to be a bit pissed off with the kind of attitude you have? You bet.
You can react in whichever fashion you deem best for you. Getting pissed off is rarely productive however. And what attitude? I address what you say exactly as you say it. If I'm condescending and arrogant (which I have been with you and Mr. Marshmallow from time to time), it's a reflection based off your responses. You get back what you put out. You're a real piece of work. You do have a victim mentality in life if you believe you've a "right" to get pissed off about anything I've said. Fact is, you've thrown far, far more attitude my way. Difference is, I couldn't care less.
Now that that's out of the way, let's begin.
Now, where exactly is your evidence? There is a difference between a logical statement and supportive evidence. You said, and I quote:
On paper, Parker loses out in strategic battle implementation (smart as he is, both Deathstroke and Black Panther have proven strategically better in a fight IMHO), durability (goes without saying) and most importantly hand to hand ability across the board (also goes without saying). I would also add to this damage output. Every single player on team Super Soldier wields a form of damage output that could potentially one shot Peter Parker. I really don't think Parker's on paper advantages are as outrageously superior as you'd like to believe.
As we can see, no evidence. And I say there's no evidence because it's in your "humble" opinion.
At least I gave an argument and didn't just decry "mismatch" as though my word was any kind of an authority. But congrats for endeavoring to engage in an actual debate. First off, forgive me for assuming my audience had but the most elementary of knowledge with regards characters they were so quick to dismiss. I mean, me making that assumption was to avoid believing you were simply biased and without reason. Guess I was wrong (for the record thatright there, was attitude. Figured if I'm going to get tagged for doing something, might as well dish it out a little).
Let me address in more detail then;
Deathstroke's ability to react instantaneously and strategically to most any contingency is part of is power set. It's what's allowed him to contend with Kid Flash so often over the years. His brain is enhanced to analyze and configure the most probable outcomes and react accordingly 10x faster than a normal human could. In other words, he forms strategy then reacts as fast as the speed of thought.
In a large way, this scan taps two birds with one stone. It addresses how quick and effective Deathstroke is at forming live strategy and adapting instantaneously to his opponent's own, and explains that his reflexes are indeed enhanced. There are other examples of this, but I wish to avoid a needless scan orgy to highlight what is supposed to be commonplace knowledge on the characters in question.
As for Black Panther, there are too many battles to choose from wherein he's won solely because he's used superior strategy. One such battle is against Iron Man. I'll choose to highlight this one simply because you are proud of Parker's showings against Iron Man (why I don't know), even though Stark completely outsmarted Peter, disorienting his spider-sense, then effortlessly putting him down in the same arc (very strategic Parker), T'Challa on the other hand used his brain;
That's what you call using strategy and one's brain to win a fight. Parker's raw IQ can compete. And while his ability to use his head in a fight has proven impressive on a few occasions, it cannot consistently compete with either Deathstroke or Black Panther.
In fact, I think that spiderman can easily hurt these soldiers if he can hurt Iron Man numerous times. For example:
Problem being, in the first example, it was Spider-Man wearing the suit Stark built for him. Jashro44 already addressed that bit. In your second example, Stark's shields were obviously not up. The metal used to create Stark's armor on it's own is no where near as durable (at that time) as vibranium, adamantium, Cap's shield (which he's used to withstand blows from the Hulk) or I would wager the Nth armor Slade now wears and Iron Man was clearly not interested in fighting back.
As for the rest of your post, you have really and truly shown nothing. You've shown that Parker can dodge bullets. Something everyone and their mothers already know. Each and every combatant in this thread has dodged bullets. I'm not going to waste anyone's time by showing scans of such ... unless you are admitting you did not even know that the Super Soldiers are each and every one bullet timers? If you do not, then again I ask, how can you state Parker can solo them all with any ounce of authority???
And as for the Sentinel, Wolverine's absolutely wrecked Sentinels in equally, or even more, impressive fashion (swiping a Sentinel's head off with his claws). What you've shown is a cherry picked scan that, again, tells us nothing we don't already know i.e. Parker is strong, Parker has webbing, and Parker can swing things. Neat.
To conclude;
Each and every one on team Super Soldier still have damage output that can potentially one shot Parker. Need proof?
Each and every one on team Super Soldier has durability that can content with Parker's damage output far more than he can theirs. Need proof?
Cheers.
Log in to comment