Ra's al Ghul vs Shang Tsung

  • 57 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for modernww2fare
modernww2fare

9160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Poll Ra's al Ghul vs Shang Tsung (58 votes)

Ra's al Ghul 22%
Shang Tsung 78%

 • 
Avatar image for ordinaryalan
OrdinaryAlan

7842

Forum Posts

1344

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By OrdinaryAlan

Shang Tsung FTW.

Avatar image for king_saturn
King_Saturn

250576

Forum Posts

509

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Shang Tsung would take Ra's Soul... besides that, they actually might be even in terms of actual Hand to Hand combat ability. It's Shang's Magic that makes this a Problem.

Avatar image for modernww2fare
modernww2fare

9160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@king_saturn: Yeah if it were just H2H this'd be a tougher call

Avatar image for legacy6364
legacy6364

7622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By legacy6364
Avatar image for life_without_progress
life_without_progress

34034

Forum Posts

5563

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

Shang Tsung stomps

Avatar image for dre_savage
Dre_Savage

6707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Shang Tsung utilizes magic based attacks in his assault, and also has the ability to change characters. He would win.

I would like to think based on what I heard, that Ghul is a better martial artist though.

Avatar image for nuffs
Nuffs

1431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Your Soul is Mine.

Avatar image for badazz
badazz

757

Forum Posts

2598

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By badazz
No Caption Provided

Avatar image for modernww2fare
modernww2fare

9160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@badazz: He really does look like Manny Pacquiao there

Avatar image for comicace3
comicace3

12438

Forum Posts

1465

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

Shang Tsung would take Ra's Soul... besides that, they actually might be even in terms of actual Hand to Hand combat ability. It's Shang's Magic that makes this a Problem.

Avatar image for modernww2fare
modernww2fare

9160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for sachmoo
Sachmoo

2500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Shang Tsung is way too powerful. Magic, fire and soul manipulation put him well above a street leveler like Ra's.

Avatar image for drew_tan
Drew_Tan

757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Shang Tsung would beat the crap out of Ra's and take his soul. Ra's would only have a chance if he is given a weapon or something to even the odds.

Avatar image for nick_hero22
nick_hero22

8769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@nick_hero22: What do you have to say about this?

Ra's Al Ghul is a better fighter, but I think that if Shang Tsung is going all out with his sorcery he might be able to give him a decent fight. I'm kinda hesitant to state this though because both Shang Tsung and Quan Chi were beat simultaneously by Kung Lao fairly easily, and Ra's Al Ghul has fought and held his own against much better combatants than him.

Avatar image for gunswordfist_
gunswordfist_

753

Forum Posts

15

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@badazz: He really does look like Manny Pacquiao there

Hahaha.

Anyway, Fatality in Tsung's favor, easily.

Avatar image for modernww2fare
modernww2fare

9160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@modernww2fare said:

@nick_hero22: What do you have to say about this?

Ra's Al Ghul is a better fighter, but I think that if Shang Tsung is going all out with his sorcery he might be able to give him a decent fight. I'm kinda hesitant to state this though because both Shang Tsung and Quan Chi were beat simultaneously by Kung Lao fairly easily, and Ra's Al Ghul has fought and held his own against much better combatants than him.

I don't know if it's "If A can beat B then A can beat C" though. I mean Sonya beat Raiden early in MK9's campaign and Johnny Cage beat Sonya.

Avatar image for nick_hero22
nick_hero22

8769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18  Edited By nick_hero22

@modernww2fare said:

@nick_hero22 said:

@modernww2fare said:

@nick_hero22: What do you have to say about this?

Ra's Al Ghul is a better fighter, but I think that if Shang Tsung is going all out with his sorcery he might be able to give him a decent fight. I'm kinda hesitant to state this though because both Shang Tsung and Quan Chi were beat simultaneously by Kung Lao fairly easily, and Ra's Al Ghul has fought and held his own against much better combatants than him.

I don't know if it's "If A can beat B then A can beat C" though. I mean Sonya beat Raiden early in MK9's campaign and Johnny Cage beat Sonya.

I don't know how anything I said boiled down to pure ABC logic? I simply stated that 1) Shang Tsung hasn't defeated any comparable fighters to Ra's Al Ghul or anyone of note for that matter and 2) Ra's Al Ghul has fought and held his own against better fighters than characters that have shown to be Shang Tsung's superior in combat. My argument never boiled down to Kung Lao beat Shang Tsung, so Ra's Al Ghul wins.

Avatar image for monsterstomp
MonsterStomp

37649

Forum Posts

361

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19  Edited By MonsterStomp
Avatar image for modernww2fare
modernww2fare

9160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20  Edited By modernww2fare

@nick_hero22:

I'm kinda hesitant to state this though because both Shang Tsung and Quan Chi were beat simultaneously by Kung Lao fairly easily, and Ra's Al Ghul has fought and held his own against much better combatants than him.

you said Ra's has beaten characters supposedly stronger than Shang Tsung and that Shang has been beaten by Kung Lao easily. My comment was that just because in MK one character has been beaten by a certain other character, that doesn't really mean that said defeated character is weaker seeing as how pretty much anyone can defeat anyone in MK if the story calls for it. So it's almost irrelevant

Avatar image for hyperlight
Hyperlight

7671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Shang tsung has better physicals and magical abilies, he is definitely beating ras

Avatar image for masako_pepper
masako_pepper

67

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22  Edited By masako_pepper

It's always so hard to find a match for MK characters. They're like between batman and spider-man in terms of power, and there aren't that much characters to fill that gap, which means they either stomp or get stomped in battles

Avatar image for nick_hero22
nick_hero22

8769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23  Edited By nick_hero22

@modernww2fare said:

@nick_hero22:

I'm kinda hesitant to state this though because both Shang Tsung and Quan Chi were beat simultaneously by Kung Lao fairly easily, and Ra's Al Ghul has fought and held his own against much better combatants than him.

you said Ra's has beaten characters supposedly stronger than Shang Tsung and that Shang has been beaten by Kung Lao easily. My comment was that just because in MK one character has been beaten by a certain other character, that doesn't really mean that said defeated character is weaker seeing as how pretty much anyone can defeat anyone in MK if the story calls for it. So it's almost irrelevant

We are talking about a specific condition for Shang Tsung's defeat which is Kung Lao's martial arts abilities. I don't see why we don't have a reasonable justification for assuming that Ra's Al Ghul who is more experience, more knowledgeable in martial arts, and has better showings in comparison to Kung Lao wouldn't be able to replicate the same feat against Shang Tsung? The reason that ABC logic is frowned upon is because it doesn't take certain specific conditions and stipulations that were pertinent to the results (i.e. hand-to-hand combat abilities) into consideration when trying to make an evaluation of a general expression. My argument wasn't merely based off his showings against Kung Lao (maybe....I should have elaborated more with my initial post), but against characters like Smoke, Liu Kang, Kitana, and etc. who have all shown that they are capable of besting Shang Tsung through the use of hand-to-hand combat techniques.This might not apply so much to Smoke though since he has a lot of smoke-based powers, but from what I seen cutscene-wise he seems to have a preference for close quarter combat like the other characters in his universe. If I stated that Kung Lao beat Shang Tsung, so therefore Ra's win would you could charge me with using ABC logic since that statement would be far too broad, but I point out that Ra's Al Ghul fighting ability would be enough to give him the win in addition to using Kung Lao as a benchmark while also trying to point out the disparity in Ra's Al Ghul's skills in comparison to Kung Lao's skills as a fighter. My position is far more nuanced then your portrayal of X beats Y, so therefore Z.

Avatar image for wastelandman
WastelandMan

13449

Forum Posts

1013

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Give Ra's some prep.

Avatar image for kingant27
Kingant27

17890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25  Edited By Kingant27

Shang Tsung wins.

Avatar image for appzashok
Appzashok

1437

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Evil sorcerer wins. He has strength and speed of a 1000 souls.he has comparable exp to Ra's. Plus he's shown himself a very capable h2h fighter,and is a very well versed in dark magic.

Avatar image for OverLordArhas
OverLordArhas

7927

Forum Posts

2722

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

Shang Tsung wins.

Avatar image for the_titan_lord
The_Titan_Lord

9508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Shang

Avatar image for modernww2fare
modernww2fare

9160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Goddamn I didn't expect Shang to get so many votes compared to Ra's. If it were just H2H Ra's would most likely win.

Avatar image for nick_hero22
nick_hero22

8769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Goddamn I didn't expect Shang to get so many votes compared to Ra's. If it were just H2H Ra's would most likely win.

Especially when you consider that less skilled fighters have beaten Shang Tsung despite his own hand-to-hand combat skills and sorcery.

Avatar image for jmarshmallow
Jmarshmallow

14023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@king_saturn said:

Shang Tsung would take Ra's Soul... besides that, they actually might be even in terms of actual Hand to Hand combat ability. It's Shang's Magic that makes this a Problem.

Avatar image for modernww2fare
modernww2fare

9160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33  Edited By modernww2fare

@nick_hero22: I want to see scans showing that Ra's is more powerful than those characters that've beaten Shang.

Avatar image for xxacid_spitxx
xxAcid_spitxx

171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for renamed040924
renamed040924

29288

Forum Posts

5083

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@modernww2fare said:

@nick_hero22 said:

@modernww2fare said:

@nick_hero22: What do you have to say about this?

Ra's Al Ghul is a better fighter, but I think that if Shang Tsung is going all out with his sorcery he might be able to give him a decent fight. I'm kinda hesitant to state this though because both Shang Tsung and Quan Chi were beat simultaneously by Kung Lao fairly easily, and Ra's Al Ghul has fought and held his own against much better combatants than him.

I don't know if it's "If A can beat B then A can beat C" though. I mean Sonya beat Raiden early in MK9's campaign and Johnny Cage beat Sonya.

What don't know how anything I said boiled down to pure ABC logic? I simply stated that 1) Shang Tsung hasn't defeated any comparable fighters to Ra's Al Ghul or anyone of note for that matter and 2) Ra's Al Ghul has fought and held his own against better fighters than characters that have shown to be Shang Tsung's superior in combat. My argument never boiled down to Kung Lao beat Shang Tsung, so Ra's Al Ghul wins.

That's more like ABCD logic.

A) Ra's = Bat family

B) Bat family > Kung Lao

C) Kung Lao > Shang

D) Ra's > Shang

Avatar image for christianrapper
christianrapper

8540

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I didn't expect Shang to get so many votes compared to Ra's. If it were just H2H Ra's would most likely win.

i doubt that. shang tsung has the experience of all those fighters whose souls he has taken. he knows styles that ras has never seen before.

Avatar image for nick_hero22
nick_hero22

8769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@nick_hero22 said:

@modernww2fare said:

@nick_hero22 said:

@modernww2fare said:

@nick_hero22: What do you have to say about this?

Ra's Al Ghul is a better fighter, but I think that if Shang Tsung is going all out with his sorcery he might be able to give him a decent fight. I'm kinda hesitant to state this though because both Shang Tsung and Quan Chi were beat simultaneously by Kung Lao fairly easily, and Ra's Al Ghul has fought and held his own against much better combatants than him.

I don't know if it's "If A can beat B then A can beat C" though. I mean Sonya beat Raiden early in MK9's campaign and Johnny Cage beat Sonya.

What don't know how anything I said boiled down to pure ABC logic? I simply stated that 1) Shang Tsung hasn't defeated any comparable fighters to Ra's Al Ghul or anyone of note for that matter and 2) Ra's Al Ghul has fought and held his own against better fighters than characters that have shown to be Shang Tsung's superior in combat. My argument never boiled down to Kung Lao beat Shang Tsung, so Ra's Al Ghul wins.

That's more like ABCD logic.

A) Ra's = Bat family

B) Bat family > Kung Lao

C) Kung Lao > Shang

D) Ra's > Shang

Nope, here is how it should look. Again, this isn't basic ABC logic because there are some conditions and stipulations that need to be met in order for us to arrive at the conclusion C > B.

If A can beat B, then C can beat B only if C is = or > than A.

A = Kung Lao

B = Shang Tsung

C = Ra's Al Ghul

Avatar image for renamed040924
renamed040924

29288

Forum Posts

5083

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for nick_hero22
nick_hero22

8769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@modernww2fare said:

I didn't expect Shang to get so many votes compared to Ra's. If it were just H2H Ra's would most likely win.

i doubt that. shang tsung has the experience of all those fighters whose souls he has taken. he knows styles that ras has never seen before.

This isn't a good argument because 1) Ra's Al Ghul has been around for much longer than Shang Tsung 2) We have no reason to believe that all the souls in Shang Tsung's possession were from skilled warriors (he could have easily taken the souls of non-combatants as well) especially when his main source of souls would have been the death warriors from the Mortal Kombat Tournament which is held almost every 100 years. Shang Tsung would have needed souls in between Tournament, regardless, if they were skilled combatants or not. 3) Despite, Shang Tsung's experience and longevity, characters who only have a small fraction of his experience and knowledge have been able to best him easily which should give you some valuable insight into his martial repertoire and abilities as a combatant.

All in all in terms of martial arts, Shang Tsung is lacking by quite a bit here and I don't think his sorcery is powerful enough to make up the gap.

Avatar image for monsterstomp
MonsterStomp

37649

Forum Posts

361

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Soul levitation b*tches!

Avatar image for nick_hero22
nick_hero22

8769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for thorverine
Thorverine

467

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Batman

Avatar image for appzashok
Appzashok

1437

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

1)Ra's alive longer than shang? Probably but they are close.

2)he doesn't have all 1000 souls being the ultimate warriors, true. But his strength and speed of all those souls plus their memories. Strength and speed plus exp of 1000 ppl(along with shang's own exp) >>> strength speed of a person who has lived for hundreds of years. Exp of ras can be debated as a match to shangs but strength and speed dept alone ras is outclassed.

3)only reason why kung lao beat him coz in MK evil must lose, good always win. In comics you can call that PIS/cis(as shang although a great tactician is very arrogant n jobber, he underestimated kung to be weak so he didn't use all his magic/skill against him).

In an actual battle, shang stomps.

So shang tsung can indeed defeat Ra's as long as he doesn't underestimate the head of league if shadow

Avatar image for renamed040924
renamed040924

29288

Forum Posts

5083

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for nick_hero22
nick_hero22

8769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@nick_hero22 said:

If A > B, then C needs to be = or > than A in order to be > than B.

So it's ABC logic.

No, and I have already explained the distinction......."The reason that ABC logic is frowned upon is because it doesn't take certain specific conditions and stipulations that were pertinent to the results (i.e. hand-to-hand combat abilities) into consideration when trying to make an evaluation of a general expression. My argument wasn't merely based off his showings against Kung Lao (maybe....I should have elaborated more with my initial post), but against characters like Smoke, Liu Kang, Kitana, and etc. who have all shown that they are capable of besting Shang Tsung through the use of hand-to-hand combat techniques.This might not apply so much to Smoke though since he has a lot of smoke-based powers, but from what I seen cutscene-wise he seems to have a preference for close quarter combat like the other characters in his universe. If I stated that Kung Lao beat Shang Tsung, so therefore Ra's win would you could charge me with using ABC logic since that statement would be far too broad, but I point out that Ra's Al Ghul fighting ability would be enough to give him the win in addition to using Kung Lao as a benchmark while also trying to point out the disparity in Ra's Al Ghul's skills in comparison to Kung Lao's skills as a fighter. My position is far more nuanced then your portrayal of X beats Y, so therefore Z.", and "Nope, here is how it should look. Again, this isn't basic ABC logic because there are some conditions and stipulations that need to be met in order for us to arrive at the conclusion C > B.".

Avatar image for renamed040924
renamed040924

29288

Forum Posts

5083

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@nickzambuto said:

@nick_hero22 said:

If A > B, then C needs to be = or > than A in order to be > than B.

So it's ABC logic.

No, and I have already explained the distinction......."The reason that ABC logic is frowned upon is because it doesn't take certain specific conditions and stipulations that were pertinent to the results (i.e. hand-to-hand combat abilities) into consideration when trying to make an evaluation of a general expression. My argument wasn't merely based off his showings against Kung Lao (maybe....I should have elaborated more with my initial post), but against characters like Smoke, Liu Kang, Kitana, and etc. who have all shown that they are capable of besting Shang Tsung through the use of hand-to-hand combat techniques.This might not apply so much to Smoke though since he has a lot of smoke-based powers, but from what I seen cutscene-wise he seems to have a preference for close quarter combat like the other characters in his universe. If I stated that Kung Lao beat Shang Tsung, so therefore Ra's win would you could charge me with using ABC logic since that statement would be far too broad, but I point out that Ra's Al Ghul fighting ability would be enough to give him the win in addition to using Kung Lao as a benchmark while also trying to point out the disparity in Ra's Al Ghul's skills in comparison to Kung Lao's skills as a fighter. My position is far more nuanced then your portrayal of X beats Y, so therefore Z.", and "Nope, here is how it should look. Again, this isn't basic ABC logic because there are some conditions and stipulations that need to be met in order for us to arrive at the conclusion C > B.".

Loading Video...

Avatar image for nick_hero22
nick_hero22

8769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

1)Ra's alive longer than shang? Probably but they are close.

2)he doesn't have all 1000 souls being the ultimate warriors, true. But his strength and speed of all those souls plus their memories. Strength and speed plus exp of 1000 ppl(along with shang's own exp) >>> strength speed of a person who has lived for hundreds of years. Exp of ras can be debated as a match to shangs but strength and speed dept alone ras is outclassed.

3)only reason why kung lao beat him coz in MK evil must lose, good always win. In comics you can call that PIS/cis(as shang although a great tactician is very arrogant n jobber, he underestimated kung to be weak so he didn't use all his magic/skill against him).

In an actual battle, shang stomps.

So shang tsung can indeed defeat Ra's as long as he doesn't underestimate the head of league if shadow

1) Shang Tsung has been around for a few centuries, while Ra's Al Ghul has been around for some millenia.

2) He doesn't get a physical enhancement in general from those souls, and he has to morph into those respective souls in order to use their abilities if they have any at all. Shang Tsung doesn't get their skills by consuming their souls either from what I recall in his fight with Smoke, where Shang Tsung morphed into Sub-Zero and Smoke told something along the lines that morphing into Sub-Zero won't give him his skills. I'm sorry, but I call BS in regards to Shang Tsung's strength and speed. Outside of gameplay mechanics and non-canon mini-games Shang Tsung has been portrayed as having the physical stats of a normal human when it comes to cutscenes in the game, while on the other hand Ra's Al Ghul has been able to fight both Batman and Nightwing who are the pinnacle of human fitness (they have the feats to back that up).

Loading Video...

3) It's PIS if there are others feats that show the contrary of the feat in question, but no such feats exist for Shang Tsung. He was a punching bag for most of the cast in the game, and the only feat he really has is invading the Wu Shi Academy with a small army of Tarkatans and briefly fighting Raiden in hand-to-hand combat before running away. The terms PIS and CIS aren't really applicable to the video genre since creative teams don't rotate around unlike comics where different creative teams come in and out of different series.

Shang Tsung loses pretty soundly here, but if he utilizes his sorcery well there is a chance he could give Ra's some work.

Avatar image for modernww2fare
modernww2fare

9160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for nick_hero22
nick_hero22

8769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for nick_hero22
nick_hero22

8769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@nick_hero22: I thought Ra's was 600 years old

You are right though, I got his origin's missed up with Apocalypses origin's