So, the only thing you've got is from the myths? No feats from the actual books? Clearly things aren't exactly the same in the books as some versions of mythology: ex the Giant Twins who didn't lift mountains
The Myths are canon to the Percy Jackson Universe.
Nothing differs, it's just that Riordan has explained how certain things operate that Classic Authors of Greek Myths didn't understand.
I can't believe you're actually arguing this. He didn't even touch the water to lift it physically. Stop being ridiculous.
So, in other words, you have no argument for all the points I just made lol?
It actually says something closer to he "erupted in a column of light and heat."
It actually says "His body ignited in a column of light and heat."
That doesn't mean he turned into light and moved at light speed.
YOU said "Why didn't he just say that he turned into light?"
That's basically EXACTLY what he said.
Ignited means to explode, and "column of light and heat" is light.
So he exploded in a column of light.
That's turning into light. And light moves at light speed, so there's really no argument there.
Even if it was just instincts, in order for his brain to process things at light speed and for his body to actually move at light speed, he'd have to be at least speed of sound
Which he is, evidenced by casually deflecting bullets off his sword and dodging supersonic dodgeballs.
How does Percy know it was the speed of sound?
How on EARTH should I know how he knows that lol? You asked for proof that it was speed of sound, and I gave it to you.
I swear, it doesn't matter what I do, you REFUSE to accept any feat that doesn't fit into your own specific view of Percy Jackson.
I have posted a DIRECT QUOTE from the book illustrating supersonic reactions, and yet you're still trying to lowball it. Ridiculous.
How do we know the monster didn't just miss?
Because it didn't say "The monster just missed me." It says
"I rolled as another dodgeball whistled past my ear at the speed of sound."
If the monster had missed, it would have said he missed. It clearly says he dodged the blow. And Tyson even warns him beforehand when the Monster is aiming at him.
You can't just dismiss Annabeth as "inconsistent" If you accept that holding the sky shows inner strength, then there's no inconsistency
I accept that inner strength plays a part, but physical strength does as well or else it wouldn't be able to flatten the mountain.
And I'm gonna do the metaphor again that you seem not to get:
"If Batman and Superman are caught up in a nuclear explosion, and both of them make it out unscathed, it's considered inconsistent for Batman because he's never shown that durability before, but it's perfectly consistent for Superman because he's durable enough to do it."
If I'm not satisfied then I can call it unsatisfactory
And you can say that, and you can hold on to that opinion till the day you die!
But just because you don't like it, doesn't make it untrue.
Log in to comment