Muhammad Ali Vs. Jackie Chan

Both in their prime.   
 
UFC Octagon
 
Win: KO, Death
 
Who wins? 
 
 
 
 
V.S. 
 

Lol, I think your intention was to do Tony Jaa vs Jackie Chan and Mike Tyson vs Muhammad Ali...right?

Lol, I think your intention was to do Tony Jaa vs Jackie Chan and Mike Tyson vs Muhammad Ali...right?

omg..

Jackie Chan wins by hitting Ali with various items he finds in a comical way.

Take out Jackie and put in Superman then we'll talk......

@Bucketz said:

@iplayps3_galactus said:

omg..

http://www.comicvine.com/forums/battles/7/killer-croc-vs-magneto-read-op/616823/  

PSH that is no where near as bad as this,mohamed ali already lost to a martial artist and didnt throw 1 punch,he screamed like a girl. 

  Jackie gets KTFO.

Just wanted to throw this out here. The OP pictures look awesome with each other.

Jackie's not a real fighter.  He's more of a martial performer specializing in stunts.  Therefore, if it was a fair fight where he cannot use all tricks and means necessary to out-quick and out-maneuver Muhammad Ali (meaning that if he had to go toe-to-toe trading blows with Ali), then Jackie would lose.   The only way Jackie would win is if there were no rules and Jackie had to use unconventional/unorthodox H2H means.

Jackie wins.

Ali wins.  

@Lance Bastro: I'm wondering what the video is supposed to prove, considering the fact that it's a movie that's only loosely based on Yip Man. It's not even an accurate representation of his life, nor does it give Jackie any bit of hope against a professional fighter. 
 
@Bucketz: You should really stop making these mismatch fights. 

@Bucketz said:

@iplayps3_galactus said:

@Bucketz said:

@iplayps3_galactus said:

omg..

http://www.comicvine.com/forums/battles/7/killer-croc-vs-magneto-read-op/616823/  

PSH that is no where near as bad as this,mohamed ali already lost to a martial artist and didnt throw 1 punch,he screamed like a girl. 

No. What you did was a complete and insane curbstomp that everyone posting in that thread was like "Wtf, is he crazy"? This is actually debatable and Boxing fans can back Ali up.  Lol Killer Croc  vs Magneto. What a joke.  

Well sorry for offending the masses and insulting the wealthy race of comic book fans,may i be hung LMFAO. 
 
This is ridiculous though,Jackie chan has never really competed and ali competed 1 time and looked like an assclown   

it's not just about jackie chan vs ali. it's more about styles... boxing whether if its ali or someone else, are purely strikers and strikers that are most comfortable using their arms to extend.   in kung fu whether if its shaolin, wing chun or the choreographed wushu is a practice of being comfortable using your entire body as "the weapon". let's say if there were two muhammad ali's from different realities of the same time-line. 1 of them became a legend at boxing while the other became a legend of kung-fu.... the kung-fu muhammad ali would win... or win more times than the boxer would.     and if there was a boxer jackie chan vs a kung fu jackie chan.... the same would be said.

Jackie chan

Would this have a different result if it was Bruce Lee instead of Jackie Chan? And no, none of that Bruce Lee is omnipotent crap. He's a god, sure.

Would this have a different result if it was Bruce Lee instead of Muhammad Ali?

@Static Shock: I've seen videos of both of them in tournaments, but I haven't seen the fights from Bruce when he did just him at the tournament.

@Static Shock: U sure?

@Devias said:

Would this have a different result if it was Bruce Lee instead of Muhammad Ali?

No. It wouldn't be different at all.

@cascadeking09: Yep. Other than that, it's very likely that Bruce has never, ever competed professionally. People talk of his 'boxing record,' but there's nothing that verifies it, nor is there information on the people he's fought. All other fights, which weren't professional, were all eye-witness accounts. He may still be the greatest martial artist of all time, but it doesn't mean that he's greatest fighter on top of that. He's more of a teacher than a fighter.  Jim Kelly, however, is supposed to be a middleweight champion in karate (just looked it up). I'd put him up against Ali before I'd put Bruce or Jackie.

Yeah, he's a beast.

@cascadeking09 said:

Yeah, he's a beast.

Hell, I'd put Van Damme against Muhammad Ali before I'd put Jackie or Bruce. Van Damme has a professional record. He was 22 - 2 before he went into acting.

Have u seen kickboxer?

@Static Shock:  But around the time Kickoxer or Double impact was made, didnt Vamm Damme get into a fight in a bar and was knockout from one hit the jaw?

  Jackie gets KTFO.

@Lance Bastro said:

it's not just about jackie chan vs ali. it's more about styles... boxing whether if its ali or someone else, are purely strikers and strikers that are most comfortable using their arms to extend.   in kung fu whether if its shaolin, wing chun or the choreographed wushu is a practice of being comfortable using your entire body as "the weapon". let's say if there were two muhammad ali's from different realities of the same time-line. 1 of them became a legend at boxing while the other became a legend of kung-fu.... the kung-fu muhammad ali would win... or win more times than the boxer would.     and if there was a boxer jackie chan vs a kung fu jackie chan.... the same would be said.

Even if they are purely strikers, they are trained to compete and take punishment in actual fights. Jackie Chan is only trained to perform martial arts as a means of putting on a show, using choreographed moves and stuntwork to entertain an audience. He isn't trained to compete or fight other skilled opponents with it. The purpose of his fighting ability is theatrical. Why is it that he's never fought professionally or actually competed against skilled fighters outside of motion pictures? How can we be sure of how skilled he really is if he's never competed before? It's all about how each fighter is trained and what they are trained for. Even if Jackie is using his whole body as a weapon, is he actually powerful enough to hurt Muhammad Ali (striking power)? Can he last long enough to fight him (endurance; boxers in Ali's time fought for 15 rounds)? Is Jackie durable enough to withstand punches from a professional boxer (supposed to be more than two to three times as powerful than the punch of an average person)? We don't know the answer to any of these questions, but considering the type of training Jackie has had, it's safe to assume to that he doesn't have what it takes to win here.  So much for Wing Chun. Bruce Lee has even admitted that Muhammad Ali would beat him in an actual fight. People seem to think that whatever they see in martial arts films extends to the real world, which isn't always the case. A lot of martial arts is bullcrap. Watching too many martial arts films is the reason for this, and even then, most of the martial artists within them aren't actual fighters, nor have they competed.