Movie Thor Vs Movie Hulk (2003)

I KNOW THAT MOVIE HULK VS MOVIE THOR HAS BEEN DONE!!!! But on that thread people weren't sure if it was 2003, 2008, or Avengers Hulk. This is 2003 Hulk vs Thor. Who would win?

Movie Thor beats all movie Hulks.

logy5000- It's a good fight, but I support Thor ftw for a few key reasons. 1) Thor was clearly trying to talk Hulk/Banner down and calm him, and he was trying not to hurt Hulk. 2) Thor used no lightning on Hulk. Thor's lightning took down two of the Leviathon's at once along with many other enemies. He could really ruin Hulk with that. 3) Thor showed he could really hurt/daze Hulk with Mjolnir, was strong enough to go hand to hand, and can dodge Hulk's punches while landing his own on Hulk's face. 4) He was going at Iron Man pretty good, and he did not have the same attitude during the Hulk fight as he was just trying to talk to 'Banner' and calm him down. "We are not your enemies Banner!"

@ckal said:

Movie Thor beats all movie Hulks.

logy5000- Those are fair critiques, although allow me to elaborate a bit on your points. In reference to 1), Hulk was not that mad at first, although he did get pretty angry with Thor after he gave him the godly uppercut. You can tell Hulk was pretty pissed when he was trying to lift Mjolnir off the ground. 2) Thor got bloodied, but even after more beatings, he was shown to be no worse for the wear in the next scene where Loki tricks him into jumping into the 'prison.' I don't think Thor was too troubled durability-wise. It seems you may be underselling the uppercut a bit. IIRC Hulk was pretty dazed for a few seconds. He recovered quickly after he recovered, but I think he was affected a bit more than you are suggesting. Thor's punch to Hulk's face and also his running knee to his head made Hulk recoil as well, so his basic physical attacks seem to be effective in addition, although they didn't trouble Hulk too much. 3) Thor was trying to subdue Hulk the whole fight, but you could really tell Thor just gave up trying to attack him and almost just let Hulk wail on him after he picked up Mjolnir and tried to subdue Hulk by putting it around his neck to choke him. After that he really didn't even try to attack Hulk anymore. I don't think it was due to him being overwhelmed by Hulk, I just think at this point he was trying to avoid Hulk getting angrier and causing more damage to people and the Helicarrier.

I actually think this version of Hulk has better feats that the other 2 versions, despite being the inferior film...That said, I still think Thor should be able to beat him....Thor damn-near one-shotted the Destoryer in his solo film.

<---- wins

If we're using logic and not fan boy hysteria, you will clearly realize they had to make the fight between Thor & Hulk fair, in The Avengers, so they took away his lightening and put them in a closed environment, otherwise Hulk would get rocked in all circumstances, logically speaking. Awaits fan boys responses~

Thor

movie thor was to overpowered... he takes this...

THOR STOMPS

@XImpossibruX said:

Wasn't Hulk having trouble with 3 mutated dogs? Thor takes this handily.

What level does 03 Hulk start at the Lab part? ,Post/Pre dog fight?,when he's fighting/running from the Army or his fight with his father?

Unlike Avengers hulk which stayed mostly the same throughout the movie 03 Hulk got stronger and bigger madder he got

I think He survived a nuke by the end of movie..correct me if i'm wrong haven't seen the movie in ages

Thor wins easily

@logy5000 said:

@CerberusPrime3k said:

What level does 03 Hulk start at the Lab part? ,Post/Pre dog fight?,when he's fighting/running from the Army or his fight with his father?

Unlike Avengers hulk which stayed mostly the same throughout the movie 03 Hulk got stronger and bigger madder he got

I think He survived a nuke by the end of movie..correct me if i'm wrong haven't seen the movie in ages

Avengers Hulk was physically stronger than 2003 Hulk. He one-shoted the Leviathen beast. 2003 Hulk had issues throwing a tank. Avengers Hulk was more durable; 2003 Hulk was cut open on the shoulder when he was caught in the explosion radius of a missile, Avengers Hulk was taking strong swings from Mjolnir with absolutely no injuries.

Cut on his shoulder which healed back instantaneously unlike Avengers Hulk whom retained battle damage throughout the final battle.

Never said 03 Hulk is stronger than Avengers Hulk just pointed out that Avengers Hulk stayed the same throughout the movie while 03 got stronger and bigger as the madder he got.

Not really all he did was spin around and tossed it a couple miles with no difficulty since Norton hulk/Ruffalo hulk are one and the same I could say he had trouble lifting a humvee.

Not only does 03 hulk have a powerful healing factor,he is also faster has jumped higher,survived a greater falling distance without changing back,has survived a nuke,struck by lightning from his father when he became it and showed no injury towards it.

I'd say the only thing Avengers Hulk has over 03 Hulk is strength which 03 Hulk could potentially surpass.

Thor should win if he uses all of his powers, then he wouldn't even have to slug it out.

A couple of things should be said in 03 Hulk's defense though. First, Hulk having trouble fighting the mutant dogs is not a low showing. Those dogs were pretty brutal and would have given trouble to any of the Avengers in a slugfest. Second, 03 Hulks best strength showing wasn't even the tank. It was that massive boulder he threw at the end of the movie when he was fighting his father. That thing should have outweight the tank by hundreds of tons I would imagine.

That's true. I should say, if Thor utilizes all of his powers he should win, but if he chooses to have a fist fight with Hulk then eventually he will get overwhelmed.

@logy5000:2003 hulk was weaker, the only thing he has better than avengers hulk is regen.

@Star_blast said:

Thor could not beat the avengers bulk this hulk is bigger and stronger Hulk wins.

Lol wut? The Avengers Hulk was way more impressive than the 2003 Hulk.

On topic though, Thor takes this.

2003 Hulk withstood more than what Thor went through as far as durability goes.

Thor in his movie never got hit wiht bullets, missles...etc like Hulk did However, Thor took out dozens of Frost Giants and took out the Destroyer, but Hulk has higher durability then them... I'll still go with Thor on this one.

@XImpossibruX said:

Wasn't Hulk having trouble with 3 mutated dogs? Thor takes this handily.

@ckal said:

Movie Thor beats all movie Hulks.

@SHAZAM117 said:

I actually think this version of Hulk has better feats that the other 2 versions, despite being the inferior film...That said, I still think Thor should be able to beat him....Thor damn-near one-shotted the Destoryer in his solo film.

@ckal said:

logy5000- Those are fair critiques, although allow me to elaborate a bit on your points. In reference to 1), Hulk was not that mad at first, although he did get pretty angry with Thor after he gave him the godly uppercut. You can tell Hulk was pretty pissed when he was trying to lift Mjolnir off the ground. 2) Thor got bloodied, but even after more beatings, he was shown to be no worse for the wear in the next scene where Loki tricks him into jumping into the 'prison.' I don't think Thor was too troubled durability-wise. It seems you may be underselling the uppercut a bit. IIRC Hulk was pretty dazed for a few seconds. He recovered quickly after he recovered, but I think he was affected a bit more than you are suggesting. Thor's punch to Hulk's face and also his running knee to his head made Hulk recoil as well, so his basic physical attacks seem to be effective in addition, although they didn't trouble Hulk too much. 3) Thor was trying to subdue Hulk the whole fight, but you could really tell Thor just gave up trying to attack him and almost just let Hulk wail on him after he picked up Mjolnir and tried to subdue Hulk by putting it around his neck to choke him. After that he really didn't even try to attack Hulk anymore. I don't think it was due to him being overwhelmed by Hulk, I just think at this point he was trying to avoid Hulk getting angrier and causing more damage to people and the Helicarrier.

Sounds right to me.

@goodguy24...True...The Destroyer fight was over so quick we never got to see the limits of Thors durability. The best showing of it was the forest battle with Iron Man, but Thor came out of that fight without a scratch if I remember correctly...Hopefully we'll see someone truly test Thor in The Dark World next year.

@Frozen: You are dead wrong.

No version of the Hulk on film showed him stronger than the 2003 version. He showed speed fast enough to catch rockets from the air, he hammer threw a tank, leapt about 4 miles at once and landed no problem while the Hulk in the avengers reverted back to banner after being dropped from the helipad. The guy rode lightning into a cliffs edge not to mention tore a chunk of stone larger than a house and got a nuke dropped on him and wasnt fazed. None of the other versions have shown better feats.