"Korg I was unaware that we were talking about a particular time in Mordor's history, but yea I think I've already proven Rome has no chance."Hey, I'm only countinueing because you asked for it. That's why I went all out with this stuff. I do believe that Rome could take Mordor, but I agree it will be very hard to beat them. As for Mordor slaughtering them, now that's still hard for me to believe. So, yea the only reason I kept going is because you asked for it by saying we should keep this going cause this is an interesting thread, lol.
Mordor vs the Roman empire
"And don't even get me started on what would happen if Sauron himself took to the field. (Old Sauron, back when he still had a corporal body.)"Sauron always had a corporeal body. The giant flaming eye was created for the movie. In the books, the Eye of Sauron is a metaphor for his omniscience, attention and force of will.
"Roman cavalry is not as deadly as mordor cavalry simply because Roman mounts don't bite and claw you to ribbons as well as trample you.That didn't stop the riders of Rohan from helping turn the tide of many battles. And they're relatively similar to the Roman cavalry.
"
"Dreadnaught said:Can horses bite you? Can horses claw you? Can horses track you for miles with their scent? Do horses eat your flesh!?!?!?!?!?!!?"Roman cavalry is not as deadly as mordor cavalry simply because Roman mounts don't bite and claw you to ribbons as well as trample you.That didn't stop the riders of Rohan from helping turn the tide of many battles. And they're relatively similar to the Roman cavalry."
"
"Dreadnaught said:Rohan would be more akin to the Mongols or the Huns, they're practically born on horseback."Roman cavalry is not as deadly as mordor cavalry simply because Roman mounts don't bite and claw you to ribbons as well as trample you.That didn't stop the riders of Rohan from helping turn the tide of many battles. And they're relatively similar to the Roman cavalry."
"
"That didn't stop the riders of Rohan from helping turn the tide of many battles. And they're relatively similar to the Roman cavalry."Actually, it kind of did. They got totally wiped out at the Battle of Pelennor Fields. The wargs also gave them a lot of trouble at Edoras. There's also the fact that they were used to the idea of fighting such things. The Romans would not know how to deal with wargs or a mûmakil bearing down on them.
"Acheron said:How about dragons?"Now, correct me if I'm wrong here cause I've only seen the LoTR movies and read one and a half of the books, but doesn't Mordor have.....trolls....and Balrogs.....and giant elephants and stuff?Only Morgoth had an army of Balrogs, ever.
"
"
"Dreadnaught said:He had flying wyrms which the Nazgul rode. They are kinda like the Dragons smaller cousins. No actual dragons, and just as well, a single great dragon could wipe out a roman army."Acheron said:How about dragons?"Now, correct me if I'm wrong here cause I've only seen the LoTR movies and read one and a half of the books, but doesn't Mordor have.....trolls....and Balrogs.....and giant elephants and stuff?Only Morgoth had an army of Balrogs, ever.
"
"
"
"The Riders of Rohan are the greatest Cavalry in all of Middle Earth and once again are superior to Roman cavalry. Rohirrim are born and bred to be the greatest horsemen there is. It's the emphasis of thier culture."
True...Also the Romans as they stand have no shot. They would need for the heroes of their mythology to exist.
"I read it about 3 years ago...I was prolly sixteen. I plan on re-reading it later on when I get a chance, but as opposed tot he Hobbit, and the three LOTR books I found it to be an especially dry and long-winded read."Well, it wasn't put together by J.R.R. Tolkien, so you can't expect it to match up, really. I think you'll get a lot more out of it the second time you read it. I read it through 2 times the first time I read it, but I realize I'm in the extreme minority there.
The Roman empire at it's peak had at best two hundred million. Most likely only a hundred million or less. Only a fourth of those people would be male adults, and only 4/5ths of those would be of fighting age. Now if rome really got desperate it could call in the children which brings up a grand total of 25-50 million, but Rome simply cannot provide the weapons for all those men. It does have better industrial capabillity than Persia which fields million man armies whenever it get's pissed off. So I'd say it could arm and equip 10-15 million.
"New battle? Roman Pantheon vs. The Valar "
Hmm...Honestly I think Jupiter and Neptune (and so people don't get confused i'm gunna refer to them as Zeus and Poseidon from here on out) with all their power, and also with their weapons and Demigod children can definately win this. Though this might be most interesting if we use the Percy Jackson version of the Olympians.
Mordor has vast industrial capability capable of rivaling a modern day great power. Probably because they have dozens of active volcanoes to use as a forge. They can equip, feed, and supply an army of Tens of billions or maybe even hundreds of billions. For every man Rome has, Mordor has a hundred thousand. And Orcs are born knowing how to fight and grow up really really fast. So they can replenish their casaulties easily. Plus Orcs can subsist on much less food and water of much lower quality than humans can.
"The Roman empire at it's peak had at best two hundred million. Most likely only a hundred million or less. Only a fourth of those people would be male adults, and only 4/5ths of those would be of fighting age. Now if rome really got desperate it could call in the children which brings up a grand total of 25-50 million, but Rome simply cannot provide the weapons for all those men. It does have better industrial capabillity than Persia which fields million man armies whenever it get's pissed off. So I'd say it could arm and equip 10-15 million.I believe it was calculated at 88 mil.
"
"I'm also intrigued about how Sauron managed to rip into this reality. Surely that power has to be an advantage as well. Imagine if he could use Doors."He and the Nazgul opened a time travel gate, but they can only manage to go forwards in time as it would take Morgoth before using his power himself to attempt to go back in time. *backwards in time is much, much harder than forwards, think of going backwards in time like going against a 295,000 kilometer per second current, doable but almost impossible*
"Dreadnaught said:Rome can make lots of javelins easily, but I don't think any barely trained and paid roman conscript would want to get within Javelin range of a blood thirsty Orc."The Roman empire at it's peak had at best two hundred million. Most likely only a hundred million or less. Only a fourth of those people would be male adults, and only 4/5ths of those would be of fighting age. Now if rome really got desperate it could call in the children which brings up a grand total of 25-50 million, but Rome simply cannot provide the weapons for all those men. It does have better industrial capabillity than Persia which fields million man armies whenever it get's pissed off. So I'd say it could arm and equip 10-15 million.I believe it was calculated at 88 mil.
"
"
Dreadnaught said:
"Braise said:Indeed. Though the outcome of the Battle of the Pelennor Fields seems to contradict what you're implying. The armies of Rohan and Gondor were vastly overwhelmed (appears as though Rohan had 6,000 vs 30,000 Easterlings as well as the combined forces of Mordor, Harad, Rhun, and Khand, oliphaunts, wargs, etc which may have numbered over 200,000), and though those in Minas Tirith had cover, those in the fields of Pelenor and Gondor had not, meaning Rohan fought out in the field against thousands of these nigh-indestructable Orcs and thrashing mounts. Though Rohan was on the losing side towards he end of the battle and did necesstate reinforcements, Rohan dealt a mighty blow to the Mordor troops nonetheless, weakening the opposition considerably. Roman has fielded more than just 6,000 horsemen in battle, such as the 17,000-33,000 (on each side) in the Battle of Philippi, with about 100,000 footsoldiers on each side as well. The battle of Cannae, taking place in 216 BC (well before Rome's peak), fielded 86,000 troops on Romes side. Under Julius Caesar in the Battle of Alesia, Rome had a force of some 30,000-60,000 footsoldiers, while the Gauls numbered high in the 300,000 (80,000 inside a well defended fort and a 250,000 standing army), and yet through Julius' ingenuity, pulled a victory that handed him only 12,000 deaths on his side, while dealing some 45-250,000 to the enemy."Dreadnaught said:Can horses bite you? Can horses claw you? Can horses track you for miles with their scent? Do horses eat your flesh!?!?!?!?!?!!?"Roman cavalry is not as deadly as mordor cavalry simply because Roman mounts don't bite and claw you to ribbons as well as trample you.That didn't stop the riders of Rohan from helping turn the tide of many battles. And they're relatively similar to the Roman cavalry."
"
"
But how many fell beasts does Mordor have? And Wargs can be killed just as easily as horses; with arrows. Mordor wins thanks to magic, but not easily.
"I had posted this an hour ago, and for some reason, it didn't post. My internet failed a couple of minutes afterward, but I copied it just in case. Here ya go:Rohirrim horsemen would crush rome's cavalry corps like a Tornado against a toothpick bridge.
Dreadnaught said:"Braise said:Indeed. Though the outcome of the Battle of the Pelennor Fields seems to contradict what you're implying. The armies of Rohan and Gondor were vastly overwhelmed (appears as though Rohan had 6,000 vs 30,000 Easterlings as well as the combined forces of Mordor, Harad, Rhun, and Khand, oliphaunts, wargs, etc which may have numbered over 200,000), and though those in Minas Tirith had cover, those in the fields of Pelenor and Gondor had not, meaning Rohan fought out in the field against thousands of these nigh-indestructable Orcs and thrashing mounts. Though Rohan was on the losing side towards he end of the battle and did necesstate reinforcements, Rohan dealt a mighty blow to the Mordor troops nonetheless, weakening the opposition considerably. Roman has fielded more than just 6,000 horsemen in battle, such as the 17,000-33,000 (on each side) in the Battle of Philippi, with about 100,000 footsoldiers on each side as well. The battle of Cannae, taking place in 216 BC (well before Rome's peak), fielded 86,000 troops on Romes side. Under Julius Caesar in the Battle of Alesia, Rome had a force of some 30,000-60,000 footsoldiers, while the Gauls numbered high in the 300,000 (80,000 inside a well defended fort and a 250,000 standing army), and yet through Julius' ingenuity, pulled a victory that handed him only 12,000 deaths on his side, while dealing some 45-250,000 to the enemy."Dreadnaught said:Can horses bite you? Can horses claw you? Can horses track you for miles with their scent? Do horses eat your flesh!?!?!?!?!?!!?"Roman cavalry is not as deadly as mordor cavalry simply because Roman mounts don't bite and claw you to ribbons as well as trample you.That didn't stop the riders of Rohan from helping turn the tide of many battles. And they're relatively similar to the Roman cavalry."
"
"
But how many fell beasts does Mordor have? And Wargs can be killed just as easily as horses; with arrows. Mordor wins thanks to magic, but not easily."
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment