moon night vs batman

two people of the night going at it who would win

I would say Batman. Moon Knight is supposed to be somewhere around Batman's league in hand to hand fighting and depending on the moon, Moon Knight's strength, reaction time and endurance increases to near superhuman levels but Batman's utility belt should put him over the top.

yeah but moon knight is a lot more unstable, if it comes to it he'll cross the lines batman wont.

What good would that do him?

Moon Knight is a very skilled hand to hand fighter and his physical stats I believe exceed Batman. But Bruce has all those gadgets and what-not so I say Bats.

His stats aren't better than Batman's unless the moon is full, and the moon doesn't even help him anymore. (And when it did, it wasn't an amazing increase in physical attributes as far as I've seen. He wasn't as strong as Killer Croc, Bane, Clayface, Grundy or anything.)

Buckshot says:

"His stats aren't better than Batman's unless the moon is full, and the moon doesn't even help him anymore. (And when it did, it wasn't an amazing increase in physical attributes as far as I've seen. He wasn't as strong as Killer Croc, Bane, Clayface, Grundy or anything.)"

Ah ok. I wasn't totally sure because I read his bio here and didn't get much until the guys up there mentioned the whole moon thing.

spiderman0409 says:

"two people of the night going at it"

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

Sorry, I had to laugh. If you don't know why I'm laughing, go read a book.

Batman is more skilled and I think would fairly easily take down Moonie.

Forever says:

"What good would that do him?"

im sayin moon knight would shank him

iSHADOW says:

"Forever says:

"What good would that do him?"

im sayin moon knight would shank him"

Shank, as in a prison-made knife? I don't think that would penetrate his Bat-armor.

iSHADOW says:

"Forever says:

"What good would that do him?"

im sayin moon knight would shank him"

Batman's fought a lot of people who wanted to kill him. People who were at least as skilled as Moon Knight and some who were far stronger, quicker... I'm just wondering why it would be different in this instance.

Prodigious Man says:

"iSHADOW says:

"Forever says:

"What good would that do him?"

im sayin moon knight would shank him"

Shank, as in a prison-made knife? I don't think that would penetrate his Bat-armor."

haha the shank thing was a joke you guys are probably right i was just thinking out loud when i said he was crazy

Oh course we're right. When Buckshot and P-Man agree on a ruling, it's as if Stan Lee and Dan DiDio themselves have spoken.

Which one am I? Stan? I think I'm Stan.

I'm the old fart, so you figure it out.

I just didn't want to be bald.

Meh, you pick.

Batman wins after a fight which would leave himself eriuosly injured.

Both are very skilled fighters and both know how to push through pain but I think that Batman is more skilled and his gadgets have the edge.

i think batman has more experience and fought tougher opponents than moonknight. so batman would definetly win.

Moon Knight comes and goes like every five years or so and has only been around since the early eighties while Batman has been around since the forties. Bats has more experience and is quite frankly just more relevant. Batman would win on popularity alone.

I would say Batman. He's got the experience, skills and the knowledge he needs to win.

Batman, he's better in evey way that's relevant in this fight.

Bats
=]

" Batman, he's better in evey way that's relevant in this fight. "

" Batman, he's better in evey way that's relevant in this fight. "