King Kong (2005) vs Godzilla (2014)

Battle takes place in San Francisco

-Their size is the same they have in their respective movies

-Both are bloodlusted

-There is no army, no Ann and no M.U.T.O.s to intervene.

Who would win and why?

godzilla steps on king kong

Mismatch.

Wasn't this already done? And Godzilla SLAUGHTERHOUSE.

@shootingnova: that one has their sizes equalized.

King Kong's roar is louder.

Godzilla's roar is cooler and his tail lights up.

This. He's also 350 feet tall to Kong's somewhat 25 foot height, if that helps.

If size is equalized King Kong, if not Godzilla just steps on him.

Tail lights up like a women's bling. King Kong beats his chest like the 8th Wonder is suppose to.

King Kong got killed by plane's and fell in love with a woman.

Godzilla tanked a nuke and had a whole city hail him a hero.

Godzilla got like 2 minutes screen time... I think I won...

And in those 2 minutes, you and everyone else in the cinema practically started bowing to your almighty lizard god.

I only bowed when Godzilla was unconscious from fighting for hours when he could have ended it in the first 2 minutes with his blue fire-breath. Sarcasm of course.

Where was Kong's fire breath? ;)

Where was Godzilla's sexy muscular chest? :O

Godzilla literally stomps Kong. He's way taller and bigger.

Godzilla stomps. Literally.

Godzilla in a stomp of epic proportions.

Anyway, King Kong was a better movie.

Godzilla stomps, it's like an ant vs a human; unless there are quite a lot of King Kong, they are doing nothing here; even then Godzilla wins most likely.

@notoverrated: If size is equalized King Kong, if not Godzilla just steps on him.

...

....oh. what makes you say that?

King Kong could maybe climb Godzilla, but that's it.

Roar in his damn ears and bust a drum!

Kong might actually win, if he starts throwing poop at Godzilla.

The size difference here is basically Titan to Jupiter.

The over the top Jack Black movie was better? The 1998 GZ film was better than the crappy King Kong movie, different strokes though right?

King Kong was a far better movie, for how weird it might be. Honestly I can't decide which american Godzilla is the worst. They're two different kind of bad.

Godzilla spite stomp

Flagged. What a stupid mismatch.

Byran cranston solo's both

@kyrees: But both their sizes were equalized in this thread.

@pyro_raptor: OP didn't equalize it. it read they are the same size on their movies

Godzilla is like 10 times bigger this is not fair

Godzilla.

@kyrees: @pyro_raptor: Even if their size was equalized it changes nothing. Its not like being bigger gives you better durability. King Kong died by guns. Godzilla got shot by tanks and naval destroyers and didn't even notice.

@kyrees: That doesnt change anything. King Kong is killed by small bullets. Godzilla tanked a world killing meteor without any problem,survived 150 000 000 Fahrenheit and killed muto who also tanked world killing meteor. That meteor has 12 kilometer diameter and hit at 20 kilometers/ second. King Kong must be 160 kilometers to harm Gz. Lol

@nwgzsjuwhm96y2: @fallschirmjager: are you two going to tell me what i know but didn't put here because of what is stipulated in the OP ?

@kyrees: I didn't mean't that. Also being bigger would give better durability. But I meant the difference is ridiculous. If kong is 90 000 tons like goji this would make him 10 000 times more durable. But this changes nothing too. Bullet with 500 joules kinetic energyx 10000 = 5 000 000. This is equal to 1 kg of TNT. Goji survived a meteor with minimally quantillion kgs TNT equalent. Gz is still minimally quantillions of times more durable

And Goji killed mutos who survived that meteor too. Gz will one shot Kong at that size with utterease. His atomic breath will instantly vaporize Kong.

@monsterstomp: No, just no... Peter Jackson's poorly directed remake was not better, it could have easily been 30 minutes shorter and that would have made it a way better movie. It is overly long and for a movie that is almost 3 hours long, it has horrible character development.

The 2014 Godzilla has its problems, but it is a way better film in almost every aspect.

King Kong is faster, he could jump up Godzilla's back and snap his neck.

Godzilla uses stomp: it's super effective

You couldn't be more wrong.

Peter Jackson's film was wonderfully made. The visuals were stunning and the chemistry between Ann and King Kong was nigh-flawless. Jackson did a wonderful job at executing Kong's death scene (I didn't cry but I know a few other guys and girls who have). The action had me on my feet and is far more entertaining since King Kong was fighting three V-Rex's while throwing Ann from hand to hand. Godzilla was all about the hype. Showing smidges of monster scenes and referencing very little at the start of the film. The casting in the film may as well have been extras, since they had next to no purpose in the film except blowing up the MUTO nest. Then when Godzilla finally made his appearance, ain't nobody in the theatre was in awe. IMDb rates King Kong over Godzilla anyway, which is accurate, in my opinion.

Lik dis if u cri evri tim

The tiniest version of Kong vs the biggest version of Godzilla? Gee, I wonder...

@leonkarlen123: Na he can't snap his neck, he'll break his arms trying

You sure? Gorilla's have a very big muscle mass