Indiana Jones vs. James Bond

We're talking about a relatively young Indy (think Last Crusade) vs. a relatively experience Bond (think Connery).  Both have their usual equipment, and they're tracking each other through a city that's been abandoned for 100 years, overgrown with jungle.  Who takes it?  I'm thinking that Bond is somewhat out of his element, although I could be mistaken.  He may be able to use buildings and abandoned tech to his advantage...

Bond shoots him......thats it...

Once they find each other and get within range, I think Bond is the better marksman and H2H combatant, Jones, IMO, is the more resiliant of the two.
Hate to do this but I say Bond ftw.  He can take it from range.  The H2H would be more dificult but I think Bond has the training to take Indy out.

Bond.

Bond....James Bond

Lil whip vs Fancy Golden guns eh ?

it's obvious sir, you know the answer.

I'm torn, they could both win, but Jones will fight dirty.

@rottenface said:

Lil whip vs Fancy Golden guns eh ?

it's obvious sir, you know the answer.

Well, a golden gun would really explode, because it's not strong enough for the gunpowder firing the bullet. So... lil whip?

All of my wut.

@Jayfournines said:

Bond....James Bond

I think Bond has this. He's superior in close or far range. Jones is cool and all but his fighting style consists mostly of throwing haymakers that don't always get the job done. Bond is more methodical and he shouldn't have too much trouble getting past the whip.

The trained MI6 Agent with a license to kill vs........an archaeologist with a whip and pistol..........What did Indy ever do to you?

James Bond. A guy who has high tech weapons will beat a guy who has few weapons.

Indy disarms bond with his whip and shoots him.

@ImmortalOne: Bond trained for battle. indy trained for find something historical..

James Bond wins easily, there's isn't much that Indy can do to him to be honest.

Indiana's foes generally all end up killing themselves because of their own stupidity and arrogance, if you guys think about it.

James Bond wins.

@AmazingScrewOnHead said:

Indy disarms bond with his whip and shoots him.

I like Indiana Jones more than Bond, but sadly dr Jones would most probably loose. If we consider JB gadgetry and fact that he is trained assassin and spy, then we know who would be the victor. If we talking about Connery version let's see fight from From russia with love - yes, JB is not martial artist extraordinaire but we see that he can be skilled, versatile, efficient and brutal and that he can defeat trained assassin in h2h combat:

Dr. Jones is more of an adventurer and a scrapper when it comes to hand to hand combat. He was in the military, but outside of the typical training a WW I soldier experienced Jones is not that capable in the ways of combat. Bond on the other hand is trained to be a walking death machine. He is trained to be the most dangerous element in all types of environment. The only possible way that Jones could defeat Bond is by outsmarting him and using the environment to his advantage. It would be difficult though. The advantage is clearly Bond's, but if Jones used his head I think he could pull it off. He might have a bloody lip and a few broken bones. Maybe a gunshot wound.

@rottenface said:

@ImmortalOne: Bond trained for battle. indy trained for find something historical..

I was joking. I know Bond would win.

@Jayfournines said:

Bond....James Bond

If it's ranged, Bond takes it easily. He is so much more experienced and has shown much better marksmanship, along with bullet dodging. And if it's up-close, even Roger Moore Bond would likely make mince meat out of Indy. But if it's Craig, Connery, Dalton, Brosnan or Lazenby, they would beat Indy without a doubt

007 stomps.

Q could take Indy