Hitler vs. Napoleon vs. Caesar

  • 70 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for one_upper
one_upper

1262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51  Edited By one_upper

Caesar...provided he has time to adjust to the new technology.

Avatar image for one_upper
one_upper

1262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52  Edited By one_upper

And whoever it was who made fun of the American Education system a few years back shot themselves in the foot by making ridiculous claims themselves.

Avatar image for cainpanell
CainPanell

23760

Forum Posts

171

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#53  Edited By CainPanell

wouldn't ceaser's men experience future shock? and possibly Napoleon's ? i mean how would they know how to handle multi shot weapons? i gotta go with if it's a single battle Napoleon but if it's long term Hitler stomps.....

Avatar image for joygirl
Joygirl

21037

Forum Posts

482

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 43

#54  Edited By Joygirl

It says in the OP that all of the leaders are FAMILIAR with their weaponry. They have time to adjust to the resources they have. Overall this is a battle of tactical minds.

Avatar image for czarny_samael666
czarny_samael666

17185

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55  Edited By czarny_samael666
@Joygirl said:
It says in the OP that all of the leaders are FAMILIAR with their weaponry. They have time to adjust to the resources they have. Overall this is a battle of tactical minds.
Agree.
Avatar image for jayfournines
Jayfournines

4160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56  Edited By Jayfournines

oooo Lord...Napoleon would take it by a landslide

Avatar image for masterjohn
MasterJohn

2663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57  Edited By MasterJohn

Napoleon in a curbstomp.

Avatar image for spiderpool94
spiderpool94

509

Forum Posts

402

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#58  Edited By spiderpool94

Napoleons. Hitler had little military involvement and hasn't got tech for blitzkrieg warfare which gt him so much success in ww2. Ceaser wasn't as directly involved in battle as Nap was.

Avatar image for nefarious
nefarious

35828

Forum Posts

6930

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#59  Edited By nefarious

Caesar.  

Avatar image for goblin123
goblin123

187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60  Edited By goblin123

Napoleon stomps...

Hitler wasn't a good military commander and definitely not a tactical genius (his domineering personality over the generals in decisions regarding the Eastern Front and the western defense against the Allies played a huge role in SHORTENING the war and hastening Germany's defeat.)

Napoleon is a tactical genius especially well-known for his skill at commanding artillery and mobile units.

Caesar just isn't a commander of the caliber of Napoleon. He tended to win battles in which he outnumbered his ennemies... Napoleon on the other hand, continuously prevailed against enemies that outnumbered him until the very end (British, Austrians, Prussians etc).

Avatar image for ssjlozza
SSJLozza

1919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61  Edited By SSJLozza

Napoleon, these are weapons of his era. They may all know how they work but Napoleon knows best how to use them tactically.

Avatar image for lord_johnathan
Lord_Johnathan

3304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62  Edited By Lord_Johnathan

Hitler was nowhere near as bad as he's often thought as being, he had a certain intuition, ut against Caesar and Napoleon he's outmatched. As for Julius vs bonaparte, I'm going to give caesar a slight edge.

Avatar image for whydama
whydama

1126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63  Edited By whydama

I am giving Napoleon the edge here. Caesar had a lot of diplomatic victories and Hitler was not really much of a general. If allying with other nations/ recruiting from the masses is allowed, then, I would give it to Hitler.

Napoleon was a general, Caesar was a statesman and Hitler was able to motivate a lot of people.

Avatar image for jonny_anonymous
Jonny_Anonymous

45773

Forum Posts

11109

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 32

#64  Edited By Jonny_Anonymous
@slick23

Adolf Hitler wasn't a good war strategist, Napoleon will win this.

Nether was Napoleon, he made the exact same mistake
Avatar image for jonny_anonymous
Jonny_Anonymous

45773

Forum Posts

11109

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 32

#65  Edited By Jonny_Anonymous
@czarny_samael666 hold up, Ceaser did not conquer Great Britain
Avatar image for omgomgwtfwtf
OmgOmgWtfWtf

7513

Forum Posts

4246

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66  Edited By OmgOmgWtfWtf

Iganvai coram morte quidem animam trahunt, audaces autem illam non saltem advertunt

Avatar image for the_lunact_and_manic
The_Lunact_And_Manic

3296

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Napoleon, not by much anyways.

Caesar isn't that good, and, hell, I could be a better strategist than Hitler..

Avatar image for goblin123
goblin123

187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68  Edited By goblin123

@whydama:

Problem was Hitler wasn't very good at alliances and manipulating civilians in foreign countries either.

He formed an alliance with Japan which bought him nothing except an earlier confrontation against the United States after Pearl Harbor that it needed to be.

Now Japan COULD have been useful to Hitler had he heavily pressured Japan to invade the Soviet Union at around the same time he invaded it. He didn't even try this intuitive move. Hell... he underestimated the Soviets to the point that he didn't want the Japanese to have any ''credit'' in the final defeat of Communism.

Hitler broke his alliance with the Soviets while Great Britain was still standing and still a threat... a good Risk player never does this. You NEVER provoke another giant when you are fighting one already.

Hitler's ultimate fail at manipulating the masses can be seen in his genocidal policies. He drove many of his nation's most brilliant minds (ex Einstein etc) OUT of his country and into countries he would later fight against. By being a dogmatic racist, he lost a TON of opportunities by needlessly pissing people off and driving people out.

In Russia during the initial stages of his campaigns many Russians and Soviet ethnic minorities HATED Stalin and wanted to help the Germans. Instead of taking full advantage of this... Hitler spits in their face and orders his troops to exterminate and enslave them to the max... thus forcing them to fight for Stalin.

You see... Hitler was a terrible strategist and manipulating the masses in times of war and managing alliances were not his strong points.

Avatar image for jayfournines
Jayfournines

4160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69  Edited By Jayfournines

I give it to Napoleon

Avatar image for ussj3071
USSJ3071

2529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

hitler dies. he was horrible as a field commander. and caesar has no experience with these strange mystical weapons of witchcraft that spit metal and fire. napoleon conquered europe with cannon and muskets